IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A Two-Stage Non Discretionary Trading Suspension Mechanism: Effects on Market Quality

Listed author(s):
  • Anolli, Mario
  • Petrella, Giovanni

This paper investigates the intraday effects on market quality of a unique trading suspension mechanism in place at the Italian stock market (Borsa Italiana) in case of price limit hit. Specifically, when prices hit the limit, Borsa Italiana halts trading for 5 minutes ('freeze phase') and removes the order that caused the limit to be hit. If trading regularly resumes after the freeze phase, exchange officials make no other intervention and we call this sequence of events 'Type 1' halt (i.e., freeze-only halt). Alternatively, if a second limit hit occurs after the freeze phase, an intraday call auction replaces the continuous trading. We name this sequence 'Type 2' halt (i.e., intraday auction halt). We examine both the general effects of trading halts and the specific effects of Type 1 and Type 2 trading suspensions on three dimensions of market quality: trading activity, return volatility, and price discovery. The full sample results reveal mixed evidence about the usefulness of price limit hit trading halts: trading volume and return volatility after the halt are abnormally high (trading interference hypothesis for volume and spillover hypothesis for volatility), whereas prices converge towards equilibrium values (cool off hypothesis for price discovery). When we partition the sample by type of halt three main results arise. First, Type 2 halts always show larger abnormal volume measures than Type 1 and this indicates a greater interference on the normal trading process of Type 2 relative to Type 1 halts. Second, Type 2 halts show lower post-halt abnormal volatility than Type 1. This might be explained by the difference in the way the market restarts after the halt. The call auction procedure associated with Type 2 allows for wider information dissemination, whereas the price discovery process in Type 1 trading halts takes place only through the tâtonnement process in continuous trading. Third, for the price discovery process, the call auction reopening procedure of Type 2 halts also has a stronger cool off effect relative to the Type 1 continuous trading.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 7931.

in new window

Date of creation: 19 Apr 2007
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:7931
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany

Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2459
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-992459
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Kate Phylaktis & Manolis Kavussanos & Gikas Manalis, 1999. "Price Limits and Stock Market Volatility in the Athens Stock Exchange," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 5(1), pages 69-84.
  2. Karpoff, Jonathan M., 1987. "The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(01), pages 109-126, March.
  3. Kim, Kenneth & Rhee, S Ghon, 1997. " Price Limit Performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 885-899, June.
  4. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1994. " Circuit Breakers and Market Volatility: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 237-254, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:7931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.