IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/70973.html

Improving service quality to local communities via satisfaction measurament in Greece: The MUSA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Makaratzi, Elisavet
  • Metaxas, Theodore
  • Terzidis, Konstantinos

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to propose a model that improves service quality to local communities via citizen satisfaction measurement. The main argument arises is that citizen satisfaction represents a modern approach for service quality in local communities and serves the development of a truly citizen-focused management and culture. Measuring citizen satisfaction offers an immediate, meaningful and objective feedback about citizens’ preferences and expectations. In this way, service performance may be evaluated in relation to a set of satisfaction dimensions that indicate the strong and the weak points of a Municipality. The study based on primary data collected through questionnaires from 456 respondents- citizens’ users of the municipality services of Skopelos Island in Greece. The main satisfaction criteria were: C.S.C (Citizen's Service Centre), Municipal Roll-Registry Office, Cleanliness -Lighting, Municipal Works, Home Assistance. These criteria are aggregated through an additive value function which is inferred from a set of satisfaction judgments with the use of the MUSA multi-criteria methodology and software. According to the findings of this research, the citizens of the Municipality of Skopelos seem to be satisfied to a large extent, either fully or partly, with the total of the provided services. However, there appeared some fields that need further improvements, such as Cleanliness - Lighting and Municipality works. The findings of the study are also related to particular policy implications regarding the role and the capacity of local authorities and decision makers to provide efficient and operational services to local communities. It’s very important to relate the findings and the case of Skopelos as pilot guide with the degree of organising capacity of local / regional authorities in larger and different municipalities in Greece. For this reason the proposed MUSA approach, we support that offers the framework to extent our analysis and to evaluate local/ regional authorities role and capacity regarding community development issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Makaratzi, Elisavet & Metaxas, Theodore & Terzidis, Konstantinos, 2016. "Improving service quality to local communities via satisfaction measurament in Greece: The MUSA approach," MPRA Paper 70973, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:70973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70973/1/MPRA_paper_70973.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul M. Williams, 2002. "Community strategies: mainstreaming sustainable development and strategic planning?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 197-205.
    2. Mihelis, G. & Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y. & Politis, Y. & Malandrakis, Y., 2001. "Customer satisfaction measurement in the private bank sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 347-360, April.
    3. Peter Karl Kresl & Balwant Singh, 1999. "Competitiveness and the Urban Economy: Twenty-four Large US Metropolitan Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 1017-1027, May.
    4. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2002. "Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 148-170, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2010. "Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 163-172, March.
    2. Bérangère Gosse & Christian Hurson, 2016. "Assessment and improvement of employee job-satisfaction: a full-scale implementation of MUSA methodology on newly recruited personnel in a major French organisation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 657-675, December.
    3. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2004. "A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: Some results from the transportation-communications sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 334-353, January.
    4. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Kokotas, Theodosios & Pantouvakis, Angelos, 2018. "A multiple criteria approach for airline passenger satisfaction measurement and service quality improvement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 61-75.
    5. Gabriela D. Oliveira & Luis C. Dias, 2020. "The potential learning effect of a MCDA approach on consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 767-787, October.
    6. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Litos, Charalambos & Moustakis, Vassilis A. & Politis, Yannis & Tsironis, Loukas, 2008. "The assessment of user-perceived web quality: Application of a satisfaction benchmarking approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1346-1357, June.
    7. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao & Chonghui Zhang, 2024. "Importance-performance analysis to develop product/service improvement strategies through online reviews with reliability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1905-1924, November.
    8. Aikaterini Zerva & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2021. "Multiple criteria analysis of citizens’ information and trust in climate change actions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7706-7727, May.
    9. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    10. Daniele Ietri, 2012. "An aging population as a benefit to Italian cities," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Daniele Ietri (ed.), European Cities and Global Competitiveness, chapter 15, pages 274-293, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Evangelia Karasmanaki & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Spyridon Galatsidas & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2023. "Satisfaction with Media Information about Renewable Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Noel, Laurent & Galariotis, Emilios & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "An ordinal regression approach for analyzing consumer preferences in the art market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 718-733.
    13. Konstantinos Zervoudakis & Konstantinos Mastrothanasis & Stelios Tsafarakis & Evangelia Krassadaki & Anastasios Kyriakidis, 2024. "Evaluating Principals’ Satisfaction with Selection Processes in Second Chance Schools: A Multicriteria Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6312-6338, June.
    14. Salil K. Sen, 2020. "Decovidization through Rurbanization: The Re-development Option for Sustainable Energy Access," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 515-523.
    15. Jaime Sobrino, 2010. "Economic Structure and Business Organization in the Central Region of Mexico," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl (ed.), Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Terrados, J. & Almonacid, G. & Pérez-Higueras, P., 2009. "Proposal for a combined methodology for renewable energy planning. Application to a Spanish region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2022-2030, October.
    17. Elias G. Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2016. "Using multiobjective mathematical programming to link national competitiveness, productivity, and innovation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 635-655, December.
    18. A. Psomas & I. Vryzidis & A. Spyridakos & M. Mimikou, 2021. "MCDA approach for agricultural water management in the context of water–energy–land–food nexus," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 689-723, March.
    19. Rocha, Phelipe Medeiros da & Barros, Alexandre Pinheiro de & Silva, Glauco Barbosa da & Costa, Helder Gomes, 2016. "Analysis of the operational performance of brazilian airport terminals: A multicriteria approach with De Borda-AHP integration," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-26.
    20. Francesco M. Olivieri & M. Simona Andreano & Roberto Benedetti, 2016. "La competitivit? territoriale delle province italiane: un?analisi spaziale delle variabili rottura," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 5-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:70973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.