IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/45593.html

Comparative Economics Of Users and Nonusers Of Dharabi Dam Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Muhammad Aamir
  • Mansoor, Bilal
  • Hanif, Aftab

Abstract

Water is a limiting factor for sustainable agriculture in Barani(Arid). However, rainfall is the only source of water the spatial and temporal variation of which is very high. Therefore conservation and management of this source is vital for agriculture development and socio-economic uplift of the area. This study was, mainly, also devised to address land distribution problems and consequent farm productivity in the study area. The farmers were divided into two main categories irrigated and rainfed farmers. The performance of most of the indicators i.e. yield, gross margins, farm income, labour productivity, income distribution, cropping intensity and crop diversity was found better in irrigated as compared to rainfed. While marginal factor productivity, irrigation productivity and rate of institutional credit availability was higher in irrigated area. However, rainfed area was always least efficient with respect to all of the quantified indicators. The findings of the research are helpful for the farmers of the study area in decision making among different farm enterprises. Hence it can alleviate poverty and help to bring food security in the deprived regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Muhammad Aamir & Mansoor, Bilal & Hanif, Aftab, 2009. "Comparative Economics Of Users and Nonusers Of Dharabi Dam Pakistan," MPRA Paper 45593, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Mar 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:45593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45593/1/MPRA_paper_45593.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molnar, I., 1965. "Production In Relation To Rainfall, Superphosphate And Erosion," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, December.
    2. repec:iwt:rerpts:h009250 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. I. Molnar, 1965. "Production In Relation To Rainfall, Superphosphate And Erosion," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 9(2), pages 169-175, December.
    4. Macours, Karen & Swinnen, Johan F. M., 2000. "Causes of Output Decline in Economic Transition: The Case of Central and Eastern European Agriculture," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 172-206, March.
    5. Mugabe, F. T. & Hodnett, M. G. & Senzanje, A., 2003. "Opportunities for increasing productive water use from dam water: a case study from semi-arid Zimbabwe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 149-163, September.
    6. repec:iwt:rerpts:h026190 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Keller, Andrew & Sakthivadivel, Ramasamy & Seckler, David, 2000. "Water scarcity and the role of storage in development," IWMI Research Reports 44575, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinden, Jack A. & Yapp, T.P., 1992. "Estimation of Opportunity Costs of Land Degradation in New South Wales: Preliminary Findings," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147322, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Ashraf, M. & Kahlown, M.A. & Ashfaq, A., 2007. "Impact of small dams on agriculture and groundwater development: A case study from Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 90-98, August.
    3. Dries, Liesbeth & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2002. "Finance, Investments And Restructuring In Polish Agriculture," PRG Working Papers 31881, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
    4. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2005. "Agricultural transformation: Lessons from experience," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(01), pages 1-20, March.
    5. repec:iwt:bosers:h026618 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Fernandez, Javier, 2002. "The Common Agricultural Policy and EU Enlargement: Implications for Agricultural Production in the Central and Eastern European Countries," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24945, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Singh, Mahesh Kumar & Kapuszta, Agnes & Fekete-Farkas, Maria, 2008. "Analyzing Agriculture Productivity Indicators And Impact Of Climate Change On Ceecs Agriculture," Bulletin of the Szent Istvan University 43317, Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences.
    8. Martínez Alvarez, V. & Leyva, J. Calatrava & Maestre Valero, J.F. & Górriz, B. Martín, 2009. "Economic assessment of shade-cloth covers for agricultural irrigation reservoirs in a semi-arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1351-1359, September.
    9. Dries, Liesbeth & Swinnen, Johan F. M., 2002. "Institutional Reform and Labor Reallocation During Transition: Theory Evidence From Polish Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 457-474, March.
    10. Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Dawe, David & Hafeez, Mohsin, 2007. "Economic evaluation of small multi-purpose ponds in the Zhanghe irrigation system, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-3), pages 61-70, July.
    11. P. Fandel, 2003. "Technical and scale efficiency of corporate farms in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(8), pages 375-384.
    12. Rodrigo Garcia‐Verdu & Alexis Meyer‐Cirkel & Akira Sasahara & Hans Weisfeld, 2022. "Importing inputs for climate change mitigation: The case of agricultural productivity," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 34-56, February.
    13. Mergos, G. & Stoforos, C. & Mishev, P. & Ivanova, N., 2001. "Analysing agricultural policy reforms under transition in Bulgaria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 475-493, October.
    14. Laurence Amblard & J.P. Colin, 2009. "Reverse tenancy in Romania: Actors' rationales and equity outcomes," Post-Print hal-00454533, HAL.
    15. Glendenning, C.J. & van Ogtrop, F.F. & Mishra, A.K. & Vervoort, R.W., 2012. "Balancing watershed and local scale impacts of rain water harvesting in India—A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Karen Macours & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2005. "Agricultural Labor Adjustments in Transition Countries: The Role of Migration and Impact on Poverty ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 405-411.
    17. Venot, Jean-Philippe & de Fraiture, Charlotte & Nti Acheampong, Ernest, 2012. "Revisiting dominant notions: a review of costs, performance and institutions of small reservoirs in sub-Saharan Africa," IWMI Research Reports 137587, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Xv, Zheng & Lv, Aifeng, 2025. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of cultivated land and its impact on water security in northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    19. Sikor, Thomas & Müller, Daniel & Stahl, Johannes, 2009. "Land Fragmentation and Cropland Abandonment in Albania: Implications for the Roles of State and Community in Post-Socialist Land Consolidation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1411-1423, August.
    20. Pramod Pandey & Pieter Zaag & Michelle Soupir & Vijay Singh, 2013. "A New Model for Simulating Supplemental Irrigation and the Hydro-Economic Potential of a Rainwater Harvesting System in Humid Subtropical Climates," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3145-3164, June.
    21. Raushan Bokusheva & Heinrich Hockmann, 2006. "Production risk and technical inefficiency in Russian agriculture," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(1), pages 93-118, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:45593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.