IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128050.html

Verbal humility, behavioral overconfidence, and the cost of ego: a Kelly-optimal consistency test for Form 13F strategy cloning

Author

Listed:
  • Fang, Meng

Abstract

This paper develops a normative decision framework for a common behavioral tension in delegated investing. Many investors are willing to acknowledge that a benchmark manager is likely superior to their own discretionary stock-picking, yet still retain a personal trading sleeve. Under a long-run log-growth (Kelly) objective, such a choice is not merely a “style preference”: it becomes a testable consistency problem about what the investor is implicitly claiming. The model separates two questions. First, when is delayed replication viable once information staleness and implementation frictions are accounted for? Second, when mixing is feasible, when is an all-in clone uniquely optimal? In a tractable diffusion benchmark with a reduced-form lag penalty, the paper derives (i) a viability boundary for replication, (ii) sufficient conditions—including an explicit correlation threshold—for which any positive weight on an inferior, positively correlated discretionary sleeve strictly reduces expected log growth, and (iii) a closed-form “Cost of Ego” that prices the compounding sacrificed to preserve subjective control. Importantly, holding cash for fractional-Kelly sizing is distinguished from retaining an inferior risky sleeve. An empirical calibration using Form 13F filings is used only to bound the lag-cost channel rather than to claim systematic outperformance. In two low-turnover case studies, the implied annualized log-growth penalty from a one-quarter delay is on the order of 0.4%–1.2%, providing a concrete scale for the “delay fear” objection. The framework yields operational diagnostics—how to compute lag, turnover/continuity proxies, and how to apply the viability and consistency tests—along with transparent scope limits rooted in 13F’s structural blind spots and discrete rebalancing risk. Archived version (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18639091 Zenodo record: https://zenodo.org/records/18639091

Suggested Citation

  • Fang, Meng, 2026. "Verbal humility, behavioral overconfidence, and the cost of ego: a Kelly-optimal consistency test for Form 13F strategy cloning," MPRA Paper 128050, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128050/1/Verbal-Humility-Overconfidence-13f-Cloning_MengFang_MPRA_v1_20260214.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.