IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/125821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Concepts from Mathematical Finance for Assessing and Achieving Intergenerationally Equitable Climate Mitigation: Implied CO2-Price, Carbon Interest Rate, Fair Share of GDP, and the Extension of an Integrated Assessment Model with a Climate Transformation Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Fries, Christian P.

Abstract

This paper applies concepts from mathematical finance to the analysis of climate change mitigation costs and policy design. We define three metrics: an implied CO2-price based on the total discounted cost of abatement and damages; a carbon interest rate, representing the internal rate of return of abatement actions; and a fair share of GDP to support effort-based climate funding. These metrics provide ex post evaluations of optimal emission pathways in integrated assessment models (IAMs), offering a descriptive framework for understanding the cost structure of climate policy. In addition, we extend an integrated assessment model by incorporating a climate transformation fund, funded by a fixed GDP share, a CO2-price, or a mix) and that finances climate-related costs over time. This extension improves intergenerational equity. We consider the general case of a stochastic model. Our numerical experiments on a classical (deterministic) DICE model show that the implied CO2-price is a factor of 10 larger than the classical social cost of carbon (a marginal price) and that the implied share of GDP is roughly 3 %. However, the model exhibits substantial intergenerational inequality. Introducing a climate transformation fund, our numerical result shows that roughly 2.4 % of the GDP is sufficient to cover all climate mitigation costs (including abatement and damage cost), equally distributing the burden among all generations. This intergenerational equitable climate change mitigation results in only a modest reduction of the GDP or consumption (significantly smaller than the funding rate). Analysing a stochastic extension of a DICE model, we see that the presence of a climate transformation fund significantly reduces the convexity and volatility of the cost structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Fries, Christian P., 2023. "Concepts from Mathematical Finance for Assessing and Achieving Intergenerationally Equitable Climate Mitigation: Implied CO2-Price, Carbon Interest Rate, Fair Share of GDP, and the Extension of an Int," MPRA Paper 125821, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Apr 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/125821/1/MPRA_paper_125821.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederick Ploeg & Armon Rezai, 2019. "Simple Rules for Climate Policy and Integrated Assessment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 77-108, January.
    2. Christian Fries & Lennart Quante, 2023. "Intergenerational Equity in Models of Climate Change Mitigation: Stochastic Interest Rates introduce Adverse Effects, but (Non-linear) Funding Costs can Improve Intergenerational Equity," Papers 2309.16186, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    3. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    4. Wilfred Beckerman & Cameron Hepburn, 2007. "Ethics of the Discount Rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 8(1), pages 187-210, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian P. Fries & Lennart Quante, 2023. "Intergenerational Equitable Climate Change Mitigation: Negative Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates; Positive Effects of Financing," Papers 2312.07614, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    2. Kalsbach, Oliver & Rausch, Sebastian, 2024. "Pricing carbon in a multi-sector economy with social discounting," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Fries, Christian P., 2024. "Fair Share of GDP to Mitigate Climate Change Costs (according to DICE)," MPRA Paper 123001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Christian Fries & Lennart Quante, 2023. "Intergenerational Equity in Models of Climate Change Mitigation: Stochastic Interest Rates introduce Adverse Effects, but (Non-linear) Funding Costs can Improve Intergenerational Equity," Papers 2309.16186, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    5. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
    7. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Richard S.J. Tol, 2021. "Estimates of the social cost of carbon have not changed over time," Working Paper Series 0821, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    9. Beaulieu, Jake & Kopits, Elizabeth & Moore, Chris C. & Parthum, Bryan M., 2024. "The Climate Benefits of Improving Water Quality," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 348911, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    10. Joyce Wang & Shiladitya DasSarma, 2024. "Contributions of Medical Greenhouse Gases to Climate Change and Their Possible Alternatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Jomo Kwame Sundaram, 2024. "Climate Taxation Distraction Accelerating Global Warming," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 67(1), pages 114-122, June.
    12. Hashemi, Majid & Jenkins, Glenn & Milne, Frank, 2024. "Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 276-301, July.
    13. Davis G. Nelson & Elena A. Mikhailova & Hamdi A. Zurqani & Lili Lin & Zhenbang Hao & Christopher J. Post & Mark A. Schlautman & George B. Shepherd, 2024. "Soil-Based Emissions and Context-Specific Climate Change Planning to Support the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) on Climate Action: A Case Study of Georgia (USA)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Weiwei Xiong & Katsumasa Tanaka & Philippe Ciais & Daniel J. A. Johansson & Mariliis Lehtveer, 2022. "emIAM v1.0: an emulator for Integrated Assessment Models using marginal abatement cost curves," Papers 2212.12060, arXiv.org.
    15. Gissela Landa Rivera & Paul Malliet & Aurélien Saussay & Frédéric Reynès, 2018. "The State of Applied Environmental Macroeconomics," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 133-149.
    16. David Suárez‐Cuesta & Maria C. Latorre & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2024. "A policy and quantitative analysis of U.S. climate policy from a global perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S7), pages 21-33, November.
    17. Johansson-Stenman, Olof & Sterner, Thomas, 2015. "Discounting and relative consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 19-33.
    18. Christoph Hambel & Holger Kraft & Frederick van der Ploeg, 2024. "Asset Diversification Versus Climate Action," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(3), pages 1323-1355, August.
    19. David J. Frame & Cameron J. Hepburn, 2011. "Emerging markets and climate change: Mexican standoff or low-carbon race?," GRI Working Papers 46, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3qbhmo3oe19bo8u5dc21qfic27 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Rick Baker & Andrew Barker & Alan Johnston & Michael Kohlhaas, 2008. "The Stern Review: an assessment of its methodology," Staff Working Papers 0801, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.