IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pdn/dispap/128.html

Using Machine Learning to Predict Firms’ Tax Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Heinemann-Heile

    (Paderborn University)

Abstract

I investigate whether a machine learning model can reliably predict firms’ tax rate perception. While standard models assume that decision-makers in firms are perfectly informed about firms’ tax rates and tax implications, also their tax rate perception influences the way in which they incorporate taxes into their decision-making processes. However, studies examining firms’ tax rate perception and its consequences remain scarce, mostly due to a lack of observations of firms’ tax rate perception. Using a dataset of German SMEs, I apply machine learning in the form of Extreme Gradient Boosting, to predict firms’ tax rate perception based on firm and personal characteristics of the decision-maker. The results show that Extreme Gradient Boosting outperforms traditional OLS regression. The model is highly accurate, as evidenced by a mean prediction error of less than one percentage point, produces reasonably precise predictions, as indicated by the root mean square error being comparable to the standard deviation, and explains up to 23.2% of the variance in firms’ tax rate perception. Even based on firm characteristics only, the model maintains high accuracy, albeit with some decline in precision and explained variance. Consistent with this finding, Shapley values highlight the importance of firm and personal characteristics such as tax compliance costs, tax literacy, and trust in government for the prediction. The results show that machine learning models can provide a time- and cost-effective way to fill the information gap created by the lack of observations on firms’ tax rate perception. This approach allows researchers and policymakers, to further analyze the impact of firms’ tax rate perception on tax reforms, tax compliance, or business decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Heinemann-Heile, 2024. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Firms’ Tax Perception," Working Papers Dissertations 128, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://groups.uni-paderborn.de/wp-wiwi/RePEc/pdf/dispap/DP128.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Bao & Bin Ke & Bin Li & Y. Julia Yu & Jie Zhang, 2020. "Detecting Accounting Fraud in Publicly Traded U.S. Firms Using a Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(1), pages 199-235, March.
    2. MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K, 1990. "Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(5), pages 1471-1493, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaowei Chen & Cong Zhai, 2023. "Bagging or boosting? Empirical evidence from financial statement fraud detection," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5093-5142, December.
    2. Jennifer Blouin & Harry Huizinga & Luc Laeven & Gaëtan Nicodème, 2013. "Thin capitalization rules and multinational firm capital structure," Working Papers 1323, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    3. Ylinen, Mika & Ranta, Mikko, 2025. "Predicting corporate innovation using machine learning and social media data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Takeo Hoshi & Anil Kashyap & David Scharfstein, 1993. "The Choice Between Public and Private Debt: An Analysis of Post-Deregulation Corporate Financing in Japan," NBER Working Papers 4421, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Bruno Biais & Christophe Bisiere & Jean-Paul Decamps, 2000. "A Structural Econometric Investigation of the Agency Theory of Financial Structure," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0817, Econometric Society.
    6. Duca, Eric & Dutordoir, Marie & Veld, Chris & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2012. "Why are convertible bond announcements associated with increasingly negative issuer stock returns? An arbitrage-based explanation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2884-2899.
    7. Ebenezer Bugri Anarfo, 2015. "Determinants of Capital Structure of Banks: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 624-640, April.
    8. Zhao, Hong & Shen, Hao & Wang, Haizhi & Zhu, Yun, 2024. "State corporate tax changes and bond pricing: U.S. evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Martin Ruf, 2010. "Holdings als Mittel der Steuerplanung zur Implementierung von steuerlich motiviertem Fremdkapital," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(8), pages 883-910, December.
    10. Shai Levi & Benjamin Segal, 2015. "The Impact of Debt-Equity Reporting Classifications on the Firm's Decision to Issue Hybrid Securities," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 801-822, December.
    11. Dang, Viet Anh & Kim, Minjoo & Shin, Yongcheol, 2014. "Asymmetric adjustment toward optimal capital structure: Evidence from a crisis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 226-242.
    12. Georg Wamser, 2014. "The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage – A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(5), pages 764-781, October.
    13. Buettner, Thiess & Overesch, Michael & Schreiber, Ulrich & Wamser, Georg, 2009. "Taxation and capital structure choice--Evidence from a panel of German multinationals," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 309-311, December.
    14. An Yan & Debarshi Nandy & Thomas Chemmanur, 2004. "Why Issue Mandatory Convertibles? Theory and Empirical Evidence," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 456, Econometric Society.
    15. John R. Graham & Sonali Hazarika & Krishnamoorthy Narasimhan, 2011. "Corporate Governance, Debt, and Investment Policy During the Great Depression," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2083-2100, December.
    16. K. Kestens & P. Van Cauwenberge & J. Christiaens & -, 2010. "An Investigation of the Effect of the Notional Interest Deduction on the Capital Structure of Belgian SMEs," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 10/640, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Wiwattanakantang, Yupana, 1999. "An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 371-403, August.
    18. Levinsohn, James & MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K, 1990. "A Simple, Consistent Estimator for Disturbance Components in Financial Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(3), pages 516-520, August.
    19. Monda, Barbara & Giorgino, Marco & Modolin, Ileana, 2013. "Rationales for Corporate Risk Management - A Critical Literature Review," MPRA Paper 45420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Anas Alqudah & Safa Jaradat & Lara Al-Haddad, 2025. "Financial Consequences of Fraud in Amman Stock Exchange Firms," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 29(1), pages 83-111, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WP-WiWi-Info (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwpadde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.