IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

National Impacts Of Changes In Livestock Disease Surveillance

Listed author(s):
  • Ann Hillberg Seitzinger


    (USDA:APHIS:Veterinary Services, Fort Collins, CO)

  • Philip L. Paarlberg


    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN)

  • Kenneth H. Mathews, Jr.


    (USDA:Economic Research Service, Washington, DC)

This research estimates the U.S. economic welfare effects of livestock disease surveillance. One type of surveillance considers livestock diseases already in the United States. Annual national economic welfare increases $1.4 billion on average compared with a Federal surveillance budget for endemic diseases of $300 million annually. Other surveillance deals with reducing the risk of foreign animal diseases entering and becoming established. The estimated annual gain to producers from surveillance for foreign animal diseases is $401 million dollars. Consumers experience additional benefits of $170 million annually. Total annual benefits are $571 million versus a foreign animal disease surveillance budget of $165 million.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics in its series Working Papers with number 10-10.

in new window

Length: 22 pages
Date of creation: 2010
Handle: RePEc:pae:wpaper:10-10
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1145 Krannert Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1145

Phone: 765 494-4191
Fax: 765 494-9176
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pae:wpaper:10-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Debby Weber)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.