IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osk/wpaper/2603.html

Effectiveness of Trading Pauses: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Akitada Kasahara

    (Graduate School of Economics, the University of Osaka)

  • Masahiro Yamada

    (School of Management, Tokyo University of Science)

Abstract

We estimate the causal effect of single-stock trading pauses on market quality using tick-by-tick order book data from the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE). Our instrumental variable exploits the TSE’s fixed yen-denominated triggering thresholds, which generate plausibly exogenous variation in the percentage distance to a trading pause across stocks with different price levels. Trading pauses significantly reduce post-event volatility, narrow quoted bid–ask spreads, and facilitate price discovery. Orderlevel analysis reveals the mechanism: during pauses, liquidity providers submit opposite-direction limit orders at aggressively priced levels that push the matching price toward reversal, generating the observed improvements. These effects are strongest for less frequently traded stocks, where incremental liquidity has the largest impact. However, the benefits are attenuated for highly volatile stocks with recent negative returns, particularly during broad market downturns.

Suggested Citation

  • Akitada Kasahara & Masahiro Yamada, 2026. "Effectiveness of Trading Pauses: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 26-03, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:2603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/econ_society/dp/2603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kewei Hou, 2007. "Industry Information Diffusion and the Lead-lag Effect in Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 1113-1138.
    2. Slezak, Steve L, 1994. "A Theory of the Dynamics of Security Returns around Market Closures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1163-1211, September.
    3. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1994. "Circuit Breakers and Market Volatility: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 237-254, March.
    4. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    5. William G. Christie & Shane A. Corwin & Jeffrey H. Harris, 2002. "Nasdaq Trading Halts: The Impact of Market Mechanisms on Prices, Trading Activity, and Execution Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 1443-1478, June.
    6. Lou, Dong & Polk, Christopher & Skouras, Spyros, 2019. "A tug of war: Overnight versus intraday expected returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 192-213.
    7. Bellia, Mario & Pelizzon, Loriana & Subrahmanyam, Marti G. & Uno, Jun & Yuferova, Darya, 2017. "Low-latency trading and price discovery: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange in the pre-opening and opening periods," SAFE Working Paper Series 144, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    8. Deb, Saikat Sovan & Kalev, Petko S & Marisetty, Vijaya B, 2017. "Price limits and volatility," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 142-156.
    9. Chen, Ting & Gao, Zhenyu & He, Jibao & Jiang, Wenxi & Xiong, Wei, 2019. "Daily price limits and destructive market behavior," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 249-264.
    10. David Abad & Roberto Pascual, 2010. "Switching To A Temporary Call Auction In Times Of High Uncertainty," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 45-75, March.
    11. Goldstein, Michael A. & Kavajecz, Kenneth A., 2004. "Trading strategies during circuit breakers and extreme market movements," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 301-333, June.
    12. Cho, David D. & Russell, Jeffrey & Tiao, George C. & Tsay, Ruey, 2003. "The magnet effect of price limits: evidence from high-frequency data on Taiwan Stock Exchange," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 133-168, February.
    13. Gerety, Mason S & Mulherin, J Harold, 1992. "Trading Halts and Market Activity: An Analysis of Volume at the Open and the Close," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(5), pages 1765-1784, December.
    14. Kodres, Laura E & O'Brien, Daniel P, 1994. "The Existence of Pareto-Superior Price Limits," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 919-932, September.
    15. Kim, Kenneth & Rhee, S Ghon, 1997. "Price Limit Performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 885-899, June.
    16. Imbens, Guido W & Angrist, Joshua D, 1994. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 467-475, March.
    17. Shane A. Corwin & Marc L. Lipson, 2000. "Order Flow and Liquidity around NYSE Trading Halts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1771-1801, August.
    18. Greenwald, Bruce C & Stein, Jeremy, 1988. "The Task Force Report: The Reasoning behind the Recommendations," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 3-23, Summer.
    19. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1997. "The ex ante effects of trade halting rules on informed trading strategies and market liquidity," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14.
    20. Lawrence Harris, 1997. "Circuit Breakers and Program Trading Limits: What Have We Learned?," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-50, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    21. Bruno Biais & Pierre Hillion & Chester Spatt, 1999. "Price Discovery and Learning during the Preopening Period in the Paris Bourse," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1218-1248, December.
    22. Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1995. "On rules versus discretion in procedures to halt trade," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-16, February.
    23. repec:bla:jfinan:v:55:y:2000:i:4:p:1771-1805 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 1997. "The ex ante effects of trade halting rules on informed trading strategies and market liquidity," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14.
    25. Hamao, Yasushi & Hasbrouck, Joel, 1995. "Securities Trading in the Absence of Dealers: Trades and Quotes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 8(3), pages 849-878.
    26. Hui Chen & Anton Petukhov & Jiang Wang & Hao Xing, 2024. "The Dark Side of Circuit Breakers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1405-1455, April.
    27. Madhavan, Ananth, 1992. "Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 607-641, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat & Azhar Mohamad, 2019. "Circuit breakers as market stability levers: A survey of research, praxis, and challenges," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 1130-1169, July.
    2. Sifat, Imtiaz Mohammad & Mohamad, Azhar, 2020. "A survey on the magnet effect of circuit breakers in financial markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-151.
    3. David Abad & Roberto Pascual, 2010. "Switching To A Temporary Call Auction In Times Of High Uncertainty," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 45-75, March.
    4. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Haferkorn, Martin & Panz, Sven, 2017. "Managing excess volatility: Design and effectiveness of circuit breakers," SAFE Working Paper Series 195, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    5. Hui Chen & Anton Petukhov & Jiang Wang & Hao Xing, 2024. "The Dark Side of Circuit Breakers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1405-1455, April.
    6. Yong H. Kim & J. Jimmy Yang, 2004. "What Makes Circuit Breakers Attractive to Financial Markets? A Survey," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 109-146, August.
    7. Du, Yan & Liu, Qianqiu & Rhee, S. Ghon, 2006. "An Anatomy of the Magnet Effect: Evidence from the Korea Stock Exchange High-Frequency Data," CEI Working Paper Series 2005-17, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    8. James Brugler & Oliver Linton, 2014. "Single stock circuit breakers on the London Stock Exchange: do they improve subsequent market quality?," CeMMAP working papers CWP07/14, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    9. Chan, Soon Huat & Kim, Kenneth A. & Rhee, S. Ghon, 2005. "Price limit performance: evidence from transactions data and the limit order book," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 269-290, March.
    10. James Brugler & Oliver Linton, 2014. "Circuit Breakers on the London Stock Exchange: Do they improve subsequent market quality?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1453, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Li, Zeguang & Hou, Keqiang & Zhang, Chao, 2021. "The impacts of circuit breakers on China's stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Kim, Yong H. & Yagüe, José & Yang, J. Jimmy, 2008. "Relative performance of trading halts and price limits: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Exchange," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 197-215.
    13. Daphne Yan Du & Qianqiu Liu & S. Ghon Rhee, 2009. "An Analysis of the Magnet Effect under Price Limits," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 9(1‐2), pages 83-110, March.
    14. Carlos Castro & Diego Agudelo & Sergio Preciado, 2017. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility call auctions," Documentos de Trabajo 15498, Universidad del Rosario.
    15. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Horvath, Akos, 2019. "How effective are trading pauses?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 378-403.
    16. Carlos Castro & Diego A. Agudelo & Sergio Preciado, 2018. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 16988, Universidad EAFIT.
    17. Diego A. Agudelo & Sergio Preciado & Carlos Castro, 2018. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 16943, Universidad EAFIT.
    18. Wang, Steven Shuye & Xu, Kuan & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "A microstructure study of circuit breakers in the Chinese stock markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Castro, Carlos & Agudelo, Diego A. & Preciado, Sergio, 2020. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility auctions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 566-581.
    20. Cheoljun Eom & Steven J. Jordan & Woo‐Baik Lee & Jong Won Park, 2020. "Programs trades and trade regulation: An evidence of the Korean securities market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 44-66, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Economic Society of Osaka University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.