IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osk/wpaper/1327r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

General Equilibrium Model for an Asymmetric Information Economy with Endogenous Resale Upperbounds

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Urai

    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University)

  • Akihiko Yoshimachi

    (Doshisha University)

  • Kohei Shiozawa

    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce production and the resale problem into the general equilibrium model with asymmetric information proposed by Dubey et al. (2000, 2005). We found that the exogenous delivery upper bound is a crucial assumption for market equilibrium and optimality problems. Importantly, the typical equilibrium allocation of an asymmetric information economy is directly related to the exogenous upper bounds. Hence, to consider market viability problems, we extended the model by introducing an apparatus that expresses the natural costs of the market delivery, so that the delivery upper bounds are determined endogenously.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Urai & Akihiko Yoshimachi & Kohei Shiozawa, 2013. "General Equilibrium Model for an Asymmetric Information Economy with Endogenous Resale Upperbounds," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 13-27-Rev., Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics, revised Jul 2015.
    • Handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:1327r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Correia-da-Silva, João, 2012. "General equilibrium in markets for lemons," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 187-195.
    2. Pradeep Dubey & John Geanakoplos & Martin Shubik, 2005. "Default and Punishment in General Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Bisin, A. & Geanakoplos, J.D. & Gottardi, P. & Minelli, E. & Polemarchakis, H., 2011. "Markets and contracts," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 279-288.
    4. Bisin, A. & Gottardi, P., 1999. "Competitive Equilibria with Asymmetric Information: Existence with Entry Fees," Working Papers 99-03, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    5. Martin Meier & Enrico Minelli & Herakles Polemarchakis, 2014. "Competitive markets with private information on both sides," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(2), pages 257-280, February.
    6. Bisin, Alberto & Gottardi, Piero, 1999. "Competitive Equilibria with Asymmetric Information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 1-48, July.
    7. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ken Urai & Akihiko Yoshimachi & Kohei Shiozawa, 2013. "General Equilibrium Model for an Asymmetric Information Economy without Delivery Upper Bounds," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 13-27-Rev.2, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics, revised Mar 2017.
    2. João Correia-da-Silva, 2015. "Two-period economies with price-contingent deliveries," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(3), pages 509-525, August.
    3. Mario Tirelli & Luca Spinesi, 2021. "R&D financing and growth," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 24-47, January.
    4. Correia-da-Silva, João, 2012. "General equilibrium in markets for lemons," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 187-195.
    5. Jacques Drèze & Enrico Minelli & Mario Tirelli, 2008. "Production and financial policies under asymmetric information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(2), pages 217-231, May.
    6. Joao Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "Uncertain delivery in markets for lemons," FEP Working Papers 310, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    7. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2011. "Nonexclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(6), pages 1869-1918, November.
    8. Scotchmer, Suzanne & Shannon, Chris, 2019. "Verifiability and group formation in markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 417-477.
    9. Giuseppe Bertola & Winfried Koeniger, 2015. "Hidden insurance in a moral-hazard economy," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(4), pages 777-790, October.
    10. Nuno Gouveia, 2004. "General equilibrium with asymmetric information and default penalties," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b05051, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), revised Jan 2005.
    11. Matt Darst & Ehraz Refayet, 2019. "Mixed Signals: Investment Distortions with Adverse Selection," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-044, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    12. Nuno Gouveia, 2005. "General equilibrium with asymmetric information and default penalties," Post-Print halshs-00195526, HAL.
    13. Martin Meier & Enrico Minelli & Herakles Polemarchakis, 2014. "Competitive markets with private information on both sides," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(2), pages 257-280, February.
    14. Ken Urai & Akihiko Yoshimachi & Kohei Shiozawa, 2013. "General Equilibrium Model for an Asymmetric Information Economy," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 13-27, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    15. Roozbeh Hosseini, 2015. "Adverse Selection in the Annuity Market and the Role for Social Security," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(4), pages 941-984.
    16. Acharya, Viral & Bisin, Alberto, 2014. "Counterparty risk externality: Centralized versus over-the-counter markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 153-182.
    17. Joseph E. Stiglitz & Jungyoll Yun & Andrew Kosenko, 2017. "Equilibrium in a Competitive Insurance Market Under Adverse Selection with Endogenous Information," NBER Working Papers 23556, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. A. Citanna & P. Siconolfi, 2016. "Designing insurance markets with moral hazard and nonexclusive contracts," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 325-360, June.
    19. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2020. "The Social Costs of Side Trading," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1608-1622.
    20. Vladimir Asriyan & Victoria Vanasco, 2019. "Security Design in Non-Exclusive Markets with Asymmetric Information," Working Papers 1164, Barcelona School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    General equilibrium model; asymmetric information; adverse selection; market unrav- eling; market viability problem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:1327r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Economic Society of Osaka University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feosujp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.