IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/p4j2r_v1.html

Butterfly Blocks at the Edge of Chaos: Conditional Morphological Regimes for Reducing Urban Stress

Author

Listed:
  • Mansourihanis, Omid
  • Wang, Xuantong

Abstract

Urban planning has long been caught between the metaphors of control and chaos. Complexity science offers a third path: cities thrive at the Edge of Chaos — the productive boundary between rigid order and dissolving disorder. Yet operationalizing this concept has been limited by the assumption that it requires longitudinal data unavailable to most cities. This paper demonstrates that a single-year geospatial snapshot is sufficient. Using 134,863 census blocks across New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston, we develop six Morphological Chaos Proxies derived from standard parcel and building-footprint data. These proxies decompose into two orthogonal axes — Disorder and Intensity — revealing a clear conditional signature: the optimal level of morphological disorder for minimizing traffic and crash stress varies systematically with intensity. In sparse settings, higher disorder reduces stress; in dense settings, moderate order performs better. Per-city Random Forest models expose markedly different stress drivers across metros, undermining the assumption of uniform national policy. The framework identifies approximately 600 Butterfly Blocks (top 1% per city) — locations where small, low-cost morphological adjustments are predicted to yield disproportionately large reductions in stress. These findings reframe resilience planning around adaptive capacity and provide a tractable, jurisdictionally portable diagnostic using existing municipal geodatabases.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansourihanis, Omid & Wang, Xuantong, 2026. "Butterfly Blocks at the Edge of Chaos: Conditional Morphological Regimes for Reducing Urban Stress," SocArXiv p4j2r_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:p4j2r_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/p4j2r_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a1a57f487b0bec21c7df71e/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/p4j2r_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2017. "“Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?” The Answer Is Yes," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 19-25, January.
    2. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    3. Chen, Yanguang, 2013. "Fractal analytical approach of urban form based on spatial correlation function," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 47-60.
    4. Miyuki Hino & Christopher B. Field & Katharine J. Mach, 2017. "Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 364-370, May.
    5. Jesse M. Keenan & Jacob T. Bradt, 2020. "Underwaterwriting: from theory to empiricism in regional mortgage markets in the U.S," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2043-2067, October.
    6. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Faan & Zhu, Yilin & Cao, Chuanpu & Yang, Xinyi & Ji, Xiang & Lai, Mingming & Qiu, Waishan & Nielsen, Chris P. & Wu, Jiaorong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2025. "Examining nonlinear causal relationship between the built environment and VKT using RF–XGBoost," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 661-681.
    2. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    3. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    4. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Blanco, Hilda & Wikstrom, Alexander, 2018. "Transit-Oriented Development Opportunities Among Failing Malls," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3h62q04h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Tian, Guang & Ewing, Reid & Li, Han, 2023. "Exploring the influences of ride-hailing services on VMT and transit usage – Evidence from California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Kane, Kevin & Zheng, Huixin, 2025. "COVID-era built environment and travel: Insights from location-based services data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2022. "Compact development and preferences for social mixing in location choices: Results from revealed preferences in Santiago, Chile," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 246-269, January.
    9. Tao, Tao & Wang, Jueyu & Cao, Xinyu, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear associations between spatial attributes and walking distance to transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Xiao, Dong & Kim, Inhi & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "Does built environment have impact on traffic congestion? —A bootstrap mediation analysis on a case study of Melbourne," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas, 2026. "Reducing traffic with “carrots”: A review of the evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    13. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    15. Samuel Heroy & Isabella Loaiza & Alex Pentland & Neave O’Clery, 2023. "Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(4), pages 958-982, May.
    16. Miotti, Marco & Needell, Zachary A. & Jain, Rishee K., 2023. "The impact of urban form on daily mobility demand and energy use: Evidence from the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    17. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Li, Xiaomeng & Neal, Zachary P., 2022. "Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis," OSF Preprints y3s69, Center for Open Science.
    19. Næss, Petter & Peters, Sebastian & Stefansdottir, Harpa & Strand, Arvid, 2018. "Causality, not just correlation: Residential location, transport rationales and travel behavior across metropolitan contexts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 181-195.
    20. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Guan, Xiaodong, 2017. "The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: Residential self-selection or residential determination?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:p4j2r_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.