IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425003684.html

Reducing traffic with “carrots”: A review of the evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Börjesson, Maria
  • Eliasson, Jonas

Abstract

Reducing traffic volumes is one way to reduce carbon emissions from the transport sector. Since increasing driving costs is often met with public resistance, high hopes are often pinned on the possibility to reduce traffic volumes by non-coercive policy measures, or “carrots”. Such measures include improvements of alternative modes, strategies that affect urban forms, and “soft measures” that aim to affect behaviour by providing information or changing norms and attitudes. This paper reviews the empirical evidence regarding such measures, focusing on their potential to reduce aggregate road traffic volumes in a national perspective. While such measures can yield significant other benefits, and may also reduce traffic volumes locally, our general conclusion is that their effects on aggregate traffic volumes appear small, especially from a climate policy perspective where emissions need to be cut radically and rapidly. While they are often motivated for several other reasons, overestimating their effects on aggregate traffic volumes may cause complacency, misallocations of scarce public resources and backlashes against climate policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas, 2026. "Reducing traffic with “carrots”: A review of the evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003684
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.