IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v190y2024ics0965856424003458.html

Does built environment have impact on traffic congestion? —A bootstrap mediation analysis on a case study of Melbourne

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Dong
  • Kim, Inhi
  • Zheng, Nan

Abstract

While the relationship between built environment, mobility choices and travel productions has been well documented, the impact of built environment on traffic performance, particularly congestion, is not extensively investigated. In existing investigations, the mechanisms by which built environment affects traffic performance-whether direct or indirect-remain unclear. Furthermore, traffic performance is mostly quantified by aggregated and rough performance metrics that fail to capture the operational characteristics of traffic. This study examines both the direct and indirect relationships between built environment and traffic congestion using the macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) to connect traffic dynamics with built environment properties. The study hypothesizes that built environment has an indirect impact on congestion and analyzes the possible indirect effects utilizing the bootstrap mediation analysis. Two components, namely the “operational capacity” and “travel demand”, are defined as mediating factors. The analysis is conducted based on data collected from 133 Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2) in the Melbourne region, Australia, including both traffic and built environment data collected from 2019. Results show that “road network connectivity” and “road network structure” can intensify congestion, while “public transit accessibility” is critical in congestion reduction. The analysis also reveals that “operational capacity” serves as a mediating factor in this relationship. Notably, this analysis identifies less pronounced mediating effects, hinting that built environment may exert a more direct influence on congestion levels. The proposed analytical method and observations hold practical value for planners and policymakers in developing strategies for planning and infrastructure development. A critical takeaway is the imperative to assess the impact on the consequent operational traffic efficiency to ensure that potential congestion is proactively mitigated through informed and sustainable planning decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Dong & Kim, Inhi & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "Does built environment have impact on traffic congestion? —A bootstrap mediation analysis on a case study of Melbourne," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424003458
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424003458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2017. "“Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?” The Answer Is Yes," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 19-25, January.
    2. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    3. Saeedmanesh, Mohammadreza & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "Dynamic clustering and propagation of congestion in heterogeneously congested urban traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 193-211.
    4. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    5. Taylor, Brian D., 2004. "The politics of congestion mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 299-302, July.
    6. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    7. Antonio M. Bento & Maureen L. Cropper & Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak & Katja Vinha, 2005. "The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 87(3), pages 466-478, August.
    8. Tian, Guang & Ewing, Reid & Li, Han, 2023. "Exploring the influences of ride-hailing services on VMT and transit usage – Evidence from California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Takao Dantsuji & Daisuke Fukuda & Nan Zheng, 2021. "Simulation-based joint optimization framework for congestion mitigation in multimodal urban network: a macroscopic approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 673-697, April.
    10. Metz, David, 2012. "Demographic determinants of daily travel demand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 20-25.
    11. Yang, Yudi & Fan, Yueyue & Royset, Johannes O., 2019. "Estimating probability distributions of travel demand on a congested network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 265-286.
    12. Piyapong Jiwattanakulpaisarn & Robert B. Noland & Daniel J. Graham, 2012. "Marginal Productivity of Expanding Highway Capacity," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 46(3), pages 333-347, September.
    13. Bhat, Chandra R. & Guo, Jessica Y., 2007. "A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 506-526, June.
    14. Wen, Tzai-Hung & Chin, Wei-Chien-Benny & Lai, Pei-Chun, 2017. "Understanding the topological characteristics and flow complexity of urban traffic congestion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 166-177.
    15. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Q. & Currie, Graham & De Gruyter, Chris & Kim, Inhi & Young, William, 2018. "Modelling the net traffic congestion impact of bus operations in Melbourne," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Zheng, Nan & Waraich, Rashid A. & Axhausen, Kay W. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2012. "A dynamic cordon pricing scheme combining the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram and an agent-based traffic model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1291-1303.
    17. De Vos, Jonas & Cheng, Long & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "The indirect effect of the built environment on travel mode choice: A focus on recent movers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    19. Gao, Shengling & Li, Daqing & Zheng, Nan & Hu, Ruiqi & She, Zhikun, 2022. "Resilient perimeter control for hyper-congested two-region networks with MFD dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 50-75.
    20. John Holtzclaw & Robert Clear & Hank Dittmar & David Goldstein & Peter Haas, 2002. "Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socio-Economic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use - Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 1-27, January.
    21. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2016. "Modeling and optimization of multimodal urban networks with limited parking and dynamic pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 36-58.
    22. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    23. Lele Zhang & Zhongqi Yuan & Li Yang & Zhiyuan Liu, 2020. "Recent developments in traffic flow modelling using macroscopic fundamental diagram," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 689-710, November.
    24. Gayah, Vikash V. & Gao, Xueyu (Shirley) & Nagle, Andrew S., 2014. "On the impacts of locally adaptive signal control on urban network stability and the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 255-268.
    25. Serdar Çolak & Antonio Lima & Marta C. González, 2016. "Understanding congested travel in urban areas," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, April.
    26. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Area-based equitable pricing strategies for multimodal urban networks with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 357-374.
    27. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2007. "Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 49-62, January.
    28. Pan, Yingjiu & Chen, Shuyan & Niu, Shifeng & Ma, Yongfeng & Tang, Kun, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of built environment on traffic states incorporating spatial heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    29. Choi, Dong-ah & Ewing, Reid, 2021. "Effect of street network design on traffic congestion and traffic safety," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dantsuji, Takao & Takayama, Yuki & Fukuda, Daisuke, 2023. "Perimeter control in a mixed bimodal bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 267-291.
    2. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    3. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Area-based equitable pricing strategies for multimodal urban networks with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 357-374.
    4. Miotti, Marco & Needell, Zachary A. & Jain, Rishee K., 2023. "The impact of urban form on daily mobility demand and energy use: Evidence from the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    5. Erick Guerra & Shengxiao Li & Ariadna Reyes, 2022. "How do low-income commuters get to work in US and Mexican cities? A comparative empirical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 75-96, January.
    6. Ding, Heng & Di, Yunran & Feng, Zhongxiang & Zhang, Weihua & Zheng, Xiaoyan & Yang, Tao, 2022. "A perimeter control method for a congested urban road network with dynamic and variable ranges," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 160-187.
    7. Loder, Allister & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Axhausen, Kay W., 2022. "Optimal pricing and investment in a multi-modal city — Introducing a macroscopic network design problem based on the MFD," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 113-132.
    8. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    9. Chen, Faan & Zhu, Yilin & Cao, Chuanpu & Yang, Xinyi & Ji, Xiang & Lai, Mingming & Qiu, Waishan & Nielsen, Chris P. & Wu, Jiaorong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2025. "Examining nonlinear causal relationship between the built environment and VKT using RF–XGBoost," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 661-681.
    10. Su, Z.C. & Chow, Andy H.F. & Fang, C.L. & Liang, E.M. & Zhong, R.X., 2023. "Hierarchical control for stochastic network traffic with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 196-216.
    11. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    12. Tang, Siyi & Zheng, Fangfang & Zheng, Nan & Liu, Xiaobo, 2024. "An efficient multi-modal urban transportation network partitioning approach for three-dimensional macroscopic fundamental diagram," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).
    13. Yu Sang Chang & Sung Jun Jo & Yoo-Taek Lee & Yoonji Lee, 2021. "Population Density or Populations Size. Which Factor Determines Urban Traffic Congestion?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Teller, David, 2020. "Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Blaudin de Thé, Camille & Carantino, Benjamin & Lafourcade, Miren, 2021. "The carbon ‘carprint’ of urbanization: New evidence from French cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Donggen Wang & Tao Lin, 2019. "Built environment, travel behavior, and residential self-selection: a study based on panel data from Beijing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 51-74, February.
    18. Zhu, Pengyu & Tan, Xinying & Zhao, Songnian & Shi, Shuai & Wang, Mingshu, 2022. "Land use regulations, transit investment, and commuting preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Tian, Guang & Ewing, Reid & Li, Han, 2023. "Exploring the influences of ride-hailing services on VMT and transit usage – Evidence from California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Kane, Kevin & Zheng, Huixin, 2025. "COVID-era built environment and travel: Insights from location-based services data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:190:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424003458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.