IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/jyr94_v1.html

The Competitiveness and WellFair: An approach of Angola Competitiveness Fail

Author

Listed:
  • Sandambi, Nerhum

Abstract

Competitiveness can, in particular, be a powerful means of improving efficiency and the high quality of products on offer, which significantly drive the market and naturally ensure the greatest possible diversity of products available. On the other hand, some countries, such as Angola, and other developing countries, naturally exhibit a significant lack of a competitive environment; this is further evidenced, for example, by the weak business environment that exists. The weakness of the private sector further helps to explain this situation; for example, in Angola, the two most significant companies are state-owned enterprises, which naturally ensure high and significant sustainability for the Angolan economy as a whole. On the other hand, the strong presence of the informal economy contributes to the creation of a poor competitive environment. Certain fundamental conditions are naturally identified as other key factors contributing to this economic inefficiency, chiefly the lack of adequate economic infrastructure. In many key industries, there is naturally a high degree of concentration; for example, in the telecommunications sector, where Unitel holds the majority share of the market. This concentration, in particular, typically leads to a high level of inefficiency in the services provided. Other services, such as water supply and electricity distribution, naturally exhibit high levels of concentration within the economy; these concentrations are, in particular, reinforced by the nature of the companies involved, the majority of which are public enterprises. Thus, in general, the analysis shows that high levels of industry concentration reduce the diversity of key products on offer and contribute significantly to negative impacts on overall welfare. In Angola in particular, this evidence is strongly consistent with the lack of local production, as the majority of basic needs are met through imported goods. According to the evidence, the absence of a strong competitive environment leads the market towards the emergence of negative externalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandambi, Nerhum, 2026. "The Competitiveness and WellFair: An approach of Angola Competitiveness Fail," SocArXiv jyr94_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jyr94_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/jyr94_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a8be2c32387b9b903ff21b0/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/jyr94_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fischer, Bernhard, 1998. "Globalization and the competitiveness of regional blocks in comparative perspective," HWWA Discussion Papers 50, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    2. Alesina, Alberto & Perotti, Roberto, 1997. "The Welfare State and Competitiveness," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(5), pages 921-939, December.
    3. Thore, Sten & Tarverdyan, Ruzanna, 2016. "The sustainable competitiveness of nations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 108-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Podrecca, 2011. "Labour market institutions and wage setting: evidence for OECD countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(25), pages 3671-3686.
    2. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Alfonso Arpaia & Giuseppe Carone, 2004. "Do labour taxes (and their composition) affect wages in the short and in the long run?," Public Economics 0411004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    5. Mai Chi Dao, 2013. "International spillovers of labour market policies," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 417-446, April.
    6. repec:ejw:journl:v:9:y:2012:i:3:p:256-297 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lee, Kangoh, 2002. "Factor Mobility and Income Redistribution in a Federation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 77-100, January.
    8. Tornell, Aaron & Lane, Philip R., 1998. "Are windfalls a curse?: A non-representative agent model of the current account," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 83-112, February.
    9. Apostolos Vetsikas & Charilaos Mertzanis & Athanasios Pavlopoulos, 2026. "National innovation systems and firms’ capital investment around the world: a N-tuple helix approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 1969-1989, April.
    10. Silvia Rocha-Akis, 2006. "Labour tax policies and strategic offshoring under unionised oligopoly," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp099, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    11. Torben M. Andersen, "undated". "International Integration and the Welfare State," Economics Working Papers 2002-2, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Doménech, Rafael & Garcí­a, José Ramón, 2008. "Unemployment, taxation and public expenditure in OECD economies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 202-217, March.
    13. Walter Paternesi Meloni, 2017. "Austerity & Competitiveness in the Eurozone: a misleading linkage," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0223, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    14. David Saha & Ronnie Schöb, 2019. "Unemployment insurance in unionized labor markets with mobile workers: neither Ghent nor centralized," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 305-326, May.
    15. Massimiliano Serati & Gianni Amisano, 2003. "Unemployment and labour taxation: an econometric analysis," LIUC Papers in Economics 122, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
    16. Alberto Alesina & Edward Glaeser & Bruce Sacerdote, 2005. "Work and Leisure in the U. S. and Europe: Why so Different?," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 2068, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    17. Munkacsi, Zsuzsa, 2015. "Fiscal austerity, unemployment and family firms," Discussion Papers 06/2015, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    18. Chibi Abderrahim & Chekouri Sidi Mohamed & Benbouziane Mohamed, 2019. "The Impact of Fiscal Policy on Economic Activity over the Business Cycle: An Empirical Investigation in the Case of Algeria," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Ikechukwu D. Nwaka & Stephen T. Onifade, 2015. "Government Size, Openness and Income Risk Nexus: New Evidence from Some African Countries," Research Africa Network Working Papers 15/056, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    20. repec:bla:scandj:v:100:y:1998:i:1:p:367-94 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Muhammad Zakaria & Samreen Shakoor, 2011. "Relationship Between Government Size and Trade Openness: Evidence from Pakistan," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 18(2), pages 328-341, December.
    22. Lane, Philip R. & Perotti, Roberto, 2003. "The importance of composition of fiscal policy: evidence from different exchange rate regimes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(9-10), pages 2253-2279, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:jyr94_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.