IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/fv8ba_v1.html

Analysing the Effect of Public Enterprises on Economy: An approach off Public Enterprises on Selected Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sandambi, Nerhum

Abstract

When examining the impacts of public enterprise on developing Countries, majority developing Countries have a considerable number of Public enterprises, on the other hand, some of these Companies for example, are naturally the driving economy, the experience of Angola show particularly this evidence. In Angola particularly, companies such as Sonangol and Endiama are naturally strongly relevant for the economy. On the other hand, the strongest inefficiency of these Companies are particularly relatively with the performance in Economy, on developing Countries exist for example high levels of corruption, that are particularly enough to drive the most Companies to high relevant inefficiency in particular. The influences that are particularly originated from these Countries on fiscal policy are naturally evidenced, where, many developing Countries for example, destined to their respective companies a significant increase of budgets, that, represented for example a strong trade off with the social protection, for example, that's mean for example, significant budgets that are particularly cabalized to these Companies, reduce significantly the expenditure with the social protection in general. The impacts about fiscal policy, can on the other hand, be translated with the existence of less tax revenue in these Countries, particularly that are proven from the respective public enterprise, on the other hand, countries such as Italy, Norway and Germany, have naturally the strongest taxes revenue. Therefore, the high level of corruption in developing Countries is plausible to enhance a good performance of the respective public enterprise, reinforced from the respective inefficiency of management in general, that are particularly promoted from the inconsistency relative with the human capital, in particular. Thus, the evidence, on the other hand, shows particularly that the existence of the high numbers of Public enterprise do not constitute the plausible reasons to generate particularly negative impacts on the economy, this evidence is strongly acceptable in some European Countries, in particular. On the other hand, the Public Enterprise in developed Countries have a particularly higher level of profit than in the developing countries, where this evidence does not exist in particular. The highest numbers of Public enterprise are naturally comprovated with the existence of a weakest economic environment, this characteristics is strongly verified in developing Countries, therefore, are naturally the strongest reason that in particular promote the success of the high level of influences from the non competitive in this economy, particularly. On the other hand, the weakest private sector existed to enhance this evidence in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandambi, Nerhum, 2026. "Analysing the Effect of Public Enterprises on Economy: An approach off Public Enterprises on Selected Developing Countries," SocArXiv fv8ba_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fv8ba_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/fv8ba_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a995301ed95b10e62662d14/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/fv8ba_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newbery, David, 1992. "The Role of Public Enterprises in the National Economy," Institute for Policy Reform Working Paper Series 294808, Institute for Policy Reform.
    2. Gary Madden & Scott Savage & Steven Kemp, 1997. "Measuring Public Sector Efficiency: A Study of Economics Departments at Australian Universities," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 153-168.
    3. Newbery, David, 1992. "The Role of Public Enterprises in the National Economy," Institute for Policy Reform Archive 294808, Institute for Policy Reform.
    4. David M. Newbery, 1992. "The Role of Public Enterprises in the National Economy," Asian Development Review (ADR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-34.
    5. Charlie Weir & David Laing & Phillip J. McKnight, 2002. "Internal and External Governance Mechanisms: Their Impact on the Performance of Large UK Public Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5&6), pages 579-611.
    6. Charlie Weir & David Laing & Phillip J. McKnight, 2002. "Internal and External Governance Mechanisms: Their Impact on the Performance of Large UK Public Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5‐6), pages 579-611.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez & Luis Carlos Ortuño-Barba & Luis David Conde-Cortés, 2022. "Corporate governance and firm performance in hybrid model countries," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 32-58, February.
    2. Tarek Roshdy Gebba & Mohamed Gamal Aboelmaged, 2016. "Corporate Governance of UAE Financial Institutions: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7.
    3. Mollah, Sabur & Zaman, Mahbub, 2015. "Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 418-435.
    4. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    5. Rania Missaoui & Aymen Ajina, 2026. "Firm dynamics in corrupt environments: the case of the BRICS countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-38, February.
    6. Anam Ashiq & Zhang Guoxing & Aftab Hussain Tabasam & Safdar Husain Tahir, 2025. "The Triple Impact: Managerial Ability, CSR, and Capital Structure on Firm Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    7. McKnight, Phillip J. & Weir, Charlie, 2009. "Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 139-158, May.
    8. Sun, Liang, 2023. "Internal alliance and firm risk," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Alexander Muravyev & Oleksandr Talavera & Charlie Weir, 2016. "Performance effects of appointing other firms’ executive directors to corporate boards: an analysis of UK firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 25-45, January.
    10. Chen, Naiwei & Yu, Min-Teh, 2024. "Human rights and value of cash: Evidence from Islamic and non-Islamic countries," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Stefania Veltri & Romilda Mazzotta, 2016. "The Association of Board Composition, Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance in a High Ownership Concentration Context: Evidence from Italy," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 317-317, September.
    12. Sabeeh Ullah & Yasir Kamal, 2022. "Corporate Governance, Political Connections and Firm Performance: The Role of Political Regimes and Size," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(4), pages 1031-1053, August.
    13. Denis Cormier & Luania Gomez Gutierrez & Michel Magnan, 2020. "Market enforcement under different legal regimes: a comparison of France and Canada," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(1), pages 37-61, March.
    14. Tzu‐Lin Chang & Hsiao‐Wen Wang & Keng‐Pei Lin & Hsin‐Yu Chen, 2022. "R&D performance and international diversification: Evidence from an emerging market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 3176-3197, October.
    15. Gregorio Sánchez‐Marín & María Encarnación Lucas‐Pérez & Samuel Baixauli‐Soler & Brian G.M. Main & Antonio Mínguez‐Vera, 2022. "Excess executive compensation and corporate governance in the United Kingdom and Spain: A comparative analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2817-2837, October.
    16. Frits H. Wijbenga & Theo J.B.M. Postma & Rebecca Stratling, 2007. "The Influence of the Venture Capitalist's Governance Activities on the Entrepreneurial Firm's Control Systems and Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(2), pages 257-277, March.
    17. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, December.
    18. Lepage, Fanny & Couderc, Jean-Pierre & Perrier, Jean-Philippe, 2014. "Déterminants des décisions d’investissement dans les exploitations laitières. Une approche par la théorie de la gouvernance élargie," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 341(May-June).
    19. Ameur Boujenoui & Richard Bozec & Daniel Zeghal, 2004. "Analyse de l’évolution des mécanismes de gouvernance d’entreprise dans les sociétés d’État au Canada," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 7(2), pages 95-122, June.
    20. Verica Babić & Jelena Nikolić & Jelena Erić, 2011. "Rethinking Board Roles Performance: Towards Integrative Model," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 56(190), pages 140-162, July – Se.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:fv8ba_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.