IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/4z9be_v1.html

Machine Learning Approaches for Improving Demand Forecasting Accuracy in Retail Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelfatah, Omar Sharafeldin Mohamed

Abstract

Accurate demand forecasting remains one of the most critical yet persistently challenging functions in retail supply chain management. Traditional statistical forecasting methods such as ARIMA and exponential smoothing have long served as industry standards; however, their limited capacity to capture nonlinear demand patterns, seasonal volatility, and external market signals has prompted growing interest in machine learning (ML) alternatives. This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of multiple ML approaches including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks, and hybrid ensemble models against traditional baseline methods in the context of retail supply chain demand forecasting. Employing a quantitative research design, the study utilizes a panel dataset comprising 36 months of point-of-sale (POS) transaction records, promotional calendars, macroeconomic indicators, and weather data from 14 retail organizations operating across grocery, fashion, and consumer electronics segments. Forecasting accuracy is evaluated using Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Forecast Bias metrics across multiple product categories and forecasting horizons (1-week, 4-week, and 12-week ahead). Results demonstrate that ensemble ML models particularly hybrid LSTM-XGBoost architectures achieve statistically significant improvements in forecasting accuracy over traditional methods, with MAPE reductions averaging 28.6% at the 4-week horizon. Feature importance analysis identifies promotional activity, competitor pricing signals, and lagged POS data as the most influential demand drivers. The study further reveals that ML forecasting benefits are heterogeneous across product categories, with highest gains 2 observed in high-velocity, promotion-sensitive SKUs and smallest gains in slow-moving, low-volatility items. A practical implementation framework is proposed, offering retail supply chain practitioners a structured pathway from data readiness assessment through model deployment and ongoing performance monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelfatah, Omar Sharafeldin Mohamed, 2026. "Machine Learning Approaches for Improving Demand Forecasting Accuracy in Retail Supply Chains," SocArXiv 4z9be_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4z9be_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4z9be_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69cadf9ee8cbf6e8db9eed30/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/4z9be_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Tao & Fildes, Robert & Soopramanien, Didier, 2014. "The value of competitive information in forecasting FMCG retail product sales and the variable selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 738-748.
    2. Hyndman, Rob J. & Khandakar, Yeasmin, 2008. "Automatic Time Series Forecasting: The forecast Package for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i03).
    3. Smyl, Slawek, 2020. "A hybrid method of exponential smoothing and recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 75-85.
    4. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    5. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    6. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    7. Syntetos, A. A. & Boylan, J. E., 2001. "On the bias of intermittent demand estimates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 457-466, May.
    8. Jay R. Galbraith, 1974. "Organization Design: An Information Processing View," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 28-36, May.
    9. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    10. Lim, Bryan & Arık, Sercan Ö. & Loeff, Nicolas & Pfister, Tomas, 2021. "Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1748-1764.
    11. Babai, Zied & Boylan, John E. & Kolassa, Stephan & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2016. "Supply chain forecasting: Theory, practice, their gap and the futureAuthor-Name: Syntetos, Aris A," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 1-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    3. Abdelfatah, Omar Sharafeldin Mohamed, 2026. "AI-Driven Demand Forecasting and Its Impact on Inventory Optimization," SocArXiv uw57j_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Marco Zanotti, 2025. "On the stability of global forecasting models," Working Papers 553, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    5. Tuominen, Jalmari & Pulkkinen, Eetu & Peltonen, Jaakko & Kanniainen, Juho & Oksala, Niku & Palomäki, Ari & Roine, Antti, 2024. "Forecasting emergency department occupancy with advanced machine learning models and multivariable input," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1410-1420.
    6. Sengupta, Shovon & Chakraborty, Tanujit & Singh, Sunny Kumar, 2025. "Forecasting CPI inflation under economic policy and geopolitical uncertainties," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 953-981.
    7. Nghia Chu & Binh Dao & Nga Pham & Huy Nguyen & Hien Tran, 2022. "Predicting Mutual Funds' Performance using Deep Learning and Ensemble Techniques," Papers 2209.09649, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    8. Katarzyna Maciejowska & Bartosz Uniejewski & Rafa{l} Weron, 2022. "Forecasting Electricity Prices," Papers 2204.11735, arXiv.org.
    9. Ma, Shaohui & Fildes, Robert, 2021. "Retail sales forecasting with meta-learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 111-128.
    10. Villegas, Marco A. & Pedregal, Diego J., 2019. "Automatic selection of unobserved components models for supply chain forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 157-169.
    11. Fildes, Robert & Ma, Shaohui & Kolassa, Stephan, 2019. "Retail forecasting: research and practice," MPRA Paper 89356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Godahewa, Rakshitha & Bergmeir, Christoph & Erkin Baz, Zeynep & Zhu, Chengjun & Song, Zhangdi & García, Salvador & Benavides, Dario, 2025. "On forecast stability," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1539-1558.
    13. Theodorou, Evangelos & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2025. "Forecast accuracy and inventory performance: Insights on their relationship from the M5 competition data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 414-426.
    14. Andrea Kolková & Aleksandr Kljuènikov, 2021. "Demand forecasting: an alternative approach based on technical indicator Pbands," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1063-1094, December.
    15. Kafa, Nadine & Babai, M. Zied & Klibi, Walid, 2025. "Forecasting mail flow: A hierarchical approach for enhanced societal wellbeing," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 51-65.
    16. Kang, Yanfei & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Petropoulos, Fotios & Athiniotis, Nikolaos & Li, Feng & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Déjà vu: A data-centric forecasting approach through time series cross-similarity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 719-731.
    17. Meisenbacher, Stefan & Phipps, Kaleb & Taubert, Oskar & Weiel, Marie & Götz, Markus & Mikut, Ralf & Hagenmeyer, Veit, 2025. "AutoPQ: Automating quantile estimation from point forecasts in the context of sustainability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    18. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    20. Aron Lindberg & Nicholas Berente & James Gaskin & Kalle Lyytinen, 2016. "Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 751-772, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4z9be_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.