IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v45y2026i6p3041-3057.html

Selecting Forecasting Methods via Literature Prominence and Accuracy Testing: Evidence From Container Throughput Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Kamal Sanguri

Abstract

Selecting methods for monthly container throughput forecasting has become more difficult in the post‐COVID period because the literature now offers a wider set of classical, decomposition‐based, machine learning, and deep learning approaches. This study develops a literature‐based Preference Index (PI) to capture method‐family prominence and combines it with rolling‐origin forecast evaluation using monthly throughput data, measured in twenty‐foot equivalent units (TEUs), from the Port of Los Angeles, the Port of Singapore Authority, and Hong Kong Port. The PI combines use, citation influence, and co‐mention embeddedness to shortlist method families rather than to rank them by forecasting superiority. The empirical phase evaluates representative univariate models: Error–Trend–Seasonal models (ETS), seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average models (SARIMA), seasonal‐trend decomposition using Loess (STL)‐based models as representatives of the Ensemble/Hybrid PI family, artificial neural network/multilayer perceptron models (ANN/MLP), and long short‐term memory/recurrent neural network models (LSTM/RNN), across 1‐, 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month horizons. Accuracy is assessed using mean absolute scaled error (MASE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), Diebold–Mariano tests, and Model Confidence Set (MCS) analysis. Results show that classical and decomposition‐based methods remain strong forecasting anchors, but the best specification differs by port: STL + ARIMA performs best for Los Angeles, STL + ETS and SARIMA are strongest for Singapore depending on horizon, while ETS and SARIMA lead for Hong Kong. The lightly specified univariate neural models do not consistently outperform these alternatives. The study offers a transparent screen‐and‐test workflow and helps clarify when classical models may suffice and when learning‐based approaches may require richer information.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamal Sanguri, 2026. "Selecting Forecasting Methods via Literature Prominence and Accuracy Testing: Evidence From Container Throughput Forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3041-3057, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:6:p:3041-3057
    DOI: 10.1002/for.70178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.70178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:6:p:3041-3057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.