IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/gx6d3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beraten statt archivieren. Wie öffentlich Beschäftigte ihr Wissen am Arbeitsplatz teilen

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Caroline

Abstract

Dieser Artikel untersucht das Teilen von Wissen durch Beschäftigte im öffentlichen Sektor. Wissensteilung ist die zentrale Voraussetzung für das organisationale Wissensmanagement. Es wurde eine Typologie entwickelt, die als Analyseraster vier Verhaltensweisen, Wissen zu teilen, unterscheidet (Berichten, Archivieren, Beraten, Hinweisen). Mithilfe von Daten aus drei Studien (qualitativ und quantitativ) wird beschrieben, wie Mitarbeiter im öffentlichen Sektor ihr Wissen teilen. Dies wurde in der Literatur bisher außer Acht gelassen. Die identifizierten Verhaltensweisen sind mehrheitlich responsiv, statt proaktiv, und richten sich direkt an Wissensnehmer, statt an ein Trägermedium. Sie können daher in der vorgeschlagenen Typologie als beratendes Verhalten eingestuft werden. Das ist weniger ressourcenaufwändig für die Wissensgeber, wirkt sich aber negativ auf die langfristige Speicherung und Auffindbarkeit von Wissen in einer Organisation aus.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Beraten statt archivieren. Wie öffentlich Beschäftigte ihr Wissen am Arbeitsplatz teilen," OSF Preprints gx6d3, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gx6d3
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gx6d3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ba8a3699108ce0015f691c4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/gx6d3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Theil, 2002. "The role of translations of verbal into numerical probability expressions in risk management: a meta-analysis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 177-186, April.
    2. John J Rodwell & Stephen TT Teo, 2004. "Strategic HRM in for-profit and non-profit organizations in a knowledge-intensive industry," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 311-331, September.
    3. Steve Bundred, 2006. "Solutions to Silos: Joining Up Knowledge," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 125-130, April.
    4. A. Willem & M. Buelens, 2005. "Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/344, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.
    6. Matzler, Kurt & Mueller, Julia, 2011. "Antecedents of knowledge sharing - Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 317-329, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Marieta Olaru & Doina I. Popescu, 2018. "An Exploratory Study on Knowledge Management Process Barriers in the Oil Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Andreas Strobl & Jessica Niedermair & Kurt Matzler & Tobias Mussner, 2019. "Triggering Subordinate Innovation Behavior: The Influence Of Leaders’ Dark Personality Traits And Level 5 Leadership Behavior," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-37, June.
    3. Fischer, Caroline, 2018. "Motivated to Share Your Knowledge? Development of a scale to measure knowledge sharing motives of public employees," OSF Preprints r5xba, Center for Open Science.
    4. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    5. Douglas Edward Abrahamson & Jane Goodman-Delahunty, 2014. "Impediments to Information and Knowledge Sharing Within Policing," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, January.
    6. Fischer, Caroline & Döring, Matthias, 2021. "Thank You for Sharing! How knowledge sharing and information availability affect public employees' job satisfaction," SocArXiv nvfsr, Center for Open Science.
    7. Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Ree M. Meertens & Wim W. F. Passchier & Nanne N. K. De Vries, 2009. "Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 267-287, February.
    8. Jaeyong Lee & Myung H. Jin & Geunpil Ryu, 2021. "Motivated to Share? Using the Person–Environment Fit Theory to Explain the Link between Public Service Motivation and Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Ibrahim S. Abdullah, 2017. "Influences of Knowledge Sharing on Individual Performance in Saudi Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Marie Juanchich & Karl Halvor Teigen & Am'elie Gourdon, 2013. "Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning): A pragmatic view of verbal probabilities," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(3), pages 345-364, May.
    11. de Jong, Ad & Schepers, Jeroen J.L. & Lages, Cristiana R. & Kadić-Maglajlić, Selma, 2021. "The role of the service manager’s perceived career success in frontline employees’ learning processes and service improvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 601-617.
    12. Boman, Mattias, 2009. "To pay or not to pay for biodiversity in forests - What scale determines responses to willingness to pay questions with uncertain response options?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 79-91, January.
    13. Pereira, Vijay & Mohiya, Mohamed, 2021. "Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 368-381.
    14. Seyedeh Samaneh Seyedi & Abolfazl Darroudi, 2023. "Personality as a Key Determinant of the Organizational Silence in Iranian Start-Ups," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 65-77, March.
    15. Robert N. Collins & David R. Mandel, 2019. "Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(6), pages 683-695, November.
    16. Linpei Song & Zhuang Ma & Junyi Sun, 2023. "The Influence of Technostress, Learning Goal Orientation, and Perceived Team Learning Climate on Intra-Team Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Practices Among ICT-Enabled Team Members," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 115-136, January.
    17. Nataša Pomazalová, 2011. "Knowledge, flawlessness and failures in processing of public procurement documents at the state administration," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 275-282.
    18. Luigino Bruni & Vittorio Pelligra & Tommaso Reggiani & Matteo Rizzolli, 2020. "The Pied Piper: Prizes, Incentives, and Motivation Crowding-in," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 643-658, October.
    19. Cui, Xiling, 2017. "In- and extra-role knowledge sharing among information technology professionals: The five-factor model perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 380-389.
    20. Jawad Karamat & Tong Shurong & Naveed Ahmad & Sana Afridi & Shahbaz Khan & Nidha Khan, 2019. "Developing Sustainable Healthcare Systems in Developing Countries: Examining the Role of Barriers, Enablers and Drivers on Knowledge Management Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gx6d3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.