IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/buvzy.html

Complementing Carbon Credits from Forest-Related Activities with Biodiversity Insurance and Resilience Value

Author

Listed:
  • Fiegenbaum, Hanna

Abstract

Carbon credits are a key component of most national and organizational climate strategies. Financing and delivering carbon credits from forest-related activities faces multiple risks at the project and asset levels. Financial mechanisms are employed to mitigate risks for investors and project developers, complemented by non-financial measures such as environmental and social safeguards and physical risk mitigation. Despite these efforts, academic research highlights that safeguards and climate risk mitigation measures are not efficiently implemented in some carbon projects and that specification of environmental safeguards remains underdeveloped. Further, environmental and social risk mitigation capacities may not be integrated into financial mechanisms. This text examines how ecosystem capacities can be leveraged and valued for mitigation of and adaptation to physical risks by complementing carbon credits with biodiversity insurance and resilience value.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiegenbaum, Hanna, 2024. "Complementing Carbon Credits from Forest-Related Activities with Biodiversity Insurance and Resilience Value," OSF Preprints buvzy, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:buvzy
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/buvzy
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67320877fda6190a9f8ea628/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/buvzy?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Kreibich & Lukas Hermwille, 2021. "Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 939-957, August.
    2. Allie Goldstein & Will R. Turner & Jillian Gladstone & David G. Hole, 2019. "The private sector’s climate change risk and adaptation blind spots," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 18-25, January.
    3. Kalhoro, Muhammad Ramzan & Kyaw, Khine, 2024. "Manage biodiversity risk exposure?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Ian A. MacKenzie & Markus Ohndorf & Charles Palmer, 2012. "Enforcement-proof contracts with moral hazard in precaution: ensuring 'permanence' in carbon sequestration," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 350-374, April.
    6. Tom Swinfield & Siddarth Shrikanth & Joseph W. Bull & Anil Madhavapeddy & Sophus O. S. E. zu Ermgassen, 2024. "Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1217-1220, October.
    7. Lauren Gifford, 2020. "“You can’t value what you can’t measure”: a critical look at forest carbon accounting," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 291-306, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:buvzy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hanna Fiegenbaum, 2024. "Complementing Carbon Credits from Forest-Related Activities with Biodiversity Insurance and Resilience Value," Papers 2411.08452, arXiv.org.
    3. Li, Jun & Jin, Yihang & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Do banks price firms' biodiversity risk? Evidence from the Kunming declaration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Katharina Momsen & Markus Ohndorf, 2019. "When do people exploit moral wiggle room? An experimental analysis in a market setup," Working Papers 2019-03, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    5. Eid M. Alotaibi & Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani, 2025. "AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Tran, Thanh Tat & Hoang, Khanh & Ngo, Thanh & Nguyen, Thang Xuan & Tran, Hien Thi Thu, 2025. "How does biodiversity risk exposure affect corporate regulatory intensity?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    7. Di Tommaso, Caterina & Foglia, Matteo & Pacelli, Vincenzo, 2025. "The impact of biodiversity score on the European firm’s performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Bayer, Patrick & Marcoux, Christopher & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2013. "Leveraging private capital for climate mitigation: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-24.
    10. Lei, Heng & Xue, Minggao & Ye, Jing, 2024. "The nexus between ReFi, carbon, fossil energy, and clean energy assets: Quantile time–frequency connectedness and portfolio implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Kooten, G. Cornelis Van, 2022. "The Impact of Carbon on Optimal Forest Rotation Ages: An Application to Coastal Forests in British Columbia," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322612, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Purnamita Dasgupta & Kavitha Srikanth, 2021. "Achieving the climate goal with intergovernmental transfers to the forestry sector: insights from the Indian experience," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Günther, Philipp & Garske, Beatrice & Heyl, Katharine & Ekardt, Felix, 2024. "Carbon farming, overestimated negative emissions and the limits to emissions trading in land-use governance: the EU carbon removal certification proposal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36, pages 1-24.
    14. Mercedes Bleda & Elisabeth Krull & Jonatan Pinkse & Eleni Christodoulou, 2023. "Organizational heuristics and firms' sensemaking for climate change adaptation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6124-6137, December.
    15. Keith Jin Deng Chan & Bon Cheung & Louis Yue Shen, 2024. "An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8868-8881, December.
    16. Li, Yulin & Liu, Xiaohui & Canil, Jean & Cheong, Chee Seng, 2025. "Biodiversity risk and firm efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Lang, Qiaoqi & Li, Chenyu & Wen, Lixuan & Wu, Hanlin, 2025. "Biodiversity risk and agricultural futures markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye & Li, Jingtian, 2025. "Does exposure to biodiversity risk drive firms’ digital transformation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Salamatu J. Tannor & Christian Borgemeister & Shalom D. Addo–Danso & Klaus Greve & Bernhard Tischbein, 2023. "Climate variability and mining sustainability: exploring operations’ perspectives on local effects and the willingness to adapt in Ghana," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Long, Xianling & Wang, Zhiqiang, 2025. "From heat to high-tech: How innovation responds to climate change," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    21. Elizabeth Canales & Jason S. Bergtold & Jeffery R. Williams, 2024. "Conservation intensification under risk: An assessment of adoption, additionality, and farmer preferences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 45-75, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:buvzy. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.