IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9513-d1779770.html

AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Eid M. Alotaibi

    (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani

    (Department of Accounting, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures face credibility risks due to Scope 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reports lacking standardized compliance checks, raising concerns about their reliability. This study therefore develops and evaluates an AI-enabled artefact for ESG compliance auditing. This artefact applies natural language processing (NLP) to extract reported values, implements rule-based checks grounded in the GHG Protocol, and produces transparent output. A design science research (DSR) approach guided the design, demonstration, and evaluation of the artefact, which was applied to sustainability reports from five technology companies. The results revealed that it replicates auditor judgments and reduces workload by over ninety percent in the sample. These findings serve as a proof-of-concept for automation in ESG compliance auditing. The theoretical contributions include extending the literature on AI in ESG auditing by reframing its role from producing interpretive scores to enabling transparent compliance verification. This study also demonstrates how DSR can help produce artefacts that embed rule-based logic into ESG assurance with rigor and practical relevance. The practical contributions include highlighting how a lightweight tool can enable auditors, regulators, boards, and investors to screen disclosures and benchmark credibility without sacrificing professional judgment.

Suggested Citation

  • Eid M. Alotaibi & Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani, 2025. "AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9513-:d:1779770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Kreibich & Lukas Hermwille, 2021. "Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 939-957, August.
    2. Rui Zhou & Jiajun Lou & Bing He, 2025. "Greening Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Impact of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy on Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Eid M Alotaibi & Ashraf Khallaf & Abed Al-Nasser Abdallah & Taisier Zoubi & Awwad Alnesafi, 2024. "Blockchain-Driven Carbon Accountability in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Paolo Perego & Ans Kolk, 2012. "Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 173-190, October.
    5. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    6. Ian Varela Soares & Masaru Yarime & Magdalena M. Klemun, 2025. "Estimating GHG emissions from cloud computing: sources of inaccuracy, opportunities and challenges in location-based and use-based approaches," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1335-1353, October.
    7. Axel Michaelowa & Lukas Hermwille & Wolfgang Obergassel & Sonja Butzengeiger, 2019. "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1211-1224, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric M. Chang & Jo-Han Cheng, 2025. "The Evolution of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: A Longitudinal Comparative Study on Moderators of Agenda 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Kreibich, Nico & Schulze-Steinen, Max, 2023. "The EU as a normative power? Fighting greenwashing and promoting the integrity of corporate climate action within and outside Article 6 of the Paris Agreement," Wuppertal Reports 25, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    3. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Elisa Bocchialini & Demetrio Miloslavo Bova & Ilaria Colivicchi & Federica Ielasi, 2024. "Environmental-, Social-, and Governance-Oriented Pension Funds for Young Contributors: A Win–Win Option," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Geert Braam & Florian Habermann & Sam Drissen, 2025. "CSR Decoupling and Assurance of CSR Reports: Do Combinations of Level, Scope, and Assurance Provider Matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8065-8081, November.
    7. Wang, Mingke & Wei, Weixian, 2025. "Modeling the economic and environmental effects of ESG preferences: A general equilibrium approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Guerrero-Escobar, Santiago & Hernández-del-Valle, Gerardo & Hernández-Vega, Marco, 2025. "The stock market effects of committing and setting GHG targets: evidence from the science-based targets initiative," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Bouyaddou, Youssef & Jebabli, Ikram, 2025. "Integration of investor behavioral perspective and climate change in reinforcement learning for portfolio optimization," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PB).
    10. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    11. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:buvzy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Hu, Zinan & Borjigin, Sumuya, 2025. "Climate information disclosure quality and systemic risk in the U.S. banking industry," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    18. Lei, Heng & Xue, Minggao & Ye, Jing, 2024. "The nexus between ReFi, carbon, fossil energy, and clean energy assets: Quantile time–frequency connectedness and portfolio implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Meng Li & Kezhi Liao & Yue Qi & Tongyang Liu, 2022. "Constructing Multiple‐Objective Portfolio Selection for Green Innovation and Dominating Green Innovation Indexes," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    20. José Vale & Ana Santos & Maria C. Tavares & Rui Bertuzi, 2024. "Voluntary Social Disclosure in an Emerging Country: The Case of Brazil," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Günther, Philipp & Garske, Beatrice & Heyl, Katharine & Ekardt, Felix, 2024. "Carbon farming, overestimated negative emissions and the limits to emissions trading in land-use governance: the EU carbon removal certification proposal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36, pages 1-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9513-:d:1779770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.