IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9513-d1779770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Eid M. Alotaibi

    (Department of Accounting and Information Systems, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani

    (Department of Accounting, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures face credibility risks due to Scope 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reports lacking standardized compliance checks, raising concerns about their reliability. This study therefore develops and evaluates an AI-enabled artefact for ESG compliance auditing. This artefact applies natural language processing (NLP) to extract reported values, implements rule-based checks grounded in the GHG Protocol, and produces transparent output. A design science research (DSR) approach guided the design, demonstration, and evaluation of the artefact, which was applied to sustainability reports from five technology companies. The results revealed that it replicates auditor judgments and reduces workload by over ninety percent in the sample. These findings serve as a proof-of-concept for automation in ESG compliance auditing. The theoretical contributions include extending the literature on AI in ESG auditing by reframing its role from producing interpretive scores to enabling transparent compliance verification. This study also demonstrates how DSR can help produce artefacts that embed rule-based logic into ESG assurance with rigor and practical relevance. The practical contributions include highlighting how a lightweight tool can enable auditors, regulators, boards, and investors to screen disclosures and benchmark credibility without sacrificing professional judgment.

Suggested Citation

  • Eid M. Alotaibi & Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani, 2025. "AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9513-:d:1779770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Kreibich & Lukas Hermwille, 2021. "Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 939-957, August.
    2. Rui Zhou & Jiajun Lou & Bing He, 2025. "Greening Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Impact of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy on Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Eid M Alotaibi & Ashraf Khallaf & Abed Al-Nasser Abdallah & Taisier Zoubi & Awwad Alnesafi, 2024. "Blockchain-Driven Carbon Accountability in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-30, December.
    4. Paolo Perego & Ans Kolk, 2012. "Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 173-190, October.
    5. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    6. Axel Michaelowa & Lukas Hermwille & Wolfgang Obergassel & Sonja Butzengeiger, 2019. "Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1211-1224, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric M. Chang & Jo-Han Cheng, 2025. "The Evolution of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: A Longitudinal Comparative Study on Moderators of Agenda 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:buvzy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    8. Jens Abildtrup & Jette Bredahl Jacobsen & Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel & Udo Mantau & Robert Mavsar & Davide Pettenella & Irina Prokofieva & Florian Schubert & Anne Stenger & Elsa Varela & Enrico Vidale & , 2024. "Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 110-128, January.
    9. Anthony Goerzen & Ari Assche & James X. Zhan & Lifang Zhang, 2025. "From the editors: Global sustainability reporting standards and the future of international business," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 125-136, June.
    10. Heejung Byun & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Identity Claims and Diffusion of Sustainability Report: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies, 2003–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 551-565, February.
    11. Jun Wan & Yuejia Wang & Yuan Wang, 2025. "Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Farjana Nur Saima & Ratan Ghosh, 2024. "Is the capital market of Bangladesh ready to reap the benefits of voluntary integrated reporting disclosures? Insights from the equity investment experts," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 589-611, December.
    13. Fiegenbaum, Hanna, 2024. "Complementing Carbon Credits from Forest-Related Activities with Biodiversity Insurance and Resilience Value," OSF Preprints buvzy, Center for Open Science.
    14. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    15. Isabel Figuerola-Ferretti & Sara Lumbreras & Paraskevas Paraskevas & Ioannis Paraskevopoulos, 2025. "Sustainability in Action: Macro-Level Evidence from Europe (2008–2023) on ESG, Green Employment, and SDG-Aligned Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-54, October.
    16. Kılıç, Merve & Kuzey, Cemil & Uyar, Ali, 2021. "An international investigation on assurance of integrated reports: Institutions, assurance quality, and assurers," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    17. Ruixin Su & Na Li, 2024. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance, Platform Governance, and Value Creation of Platform Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    19. repec:ehu:cuader:55446 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    21. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Orazalin, Nurlan & Uyar, Ali & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    22. Changjiang Zhang & Sihan Zhang & Zhepeng Zhou & Bing He, 2025. "Merging Economic Aspirations with Sustainability: ESG and the Evolution of the Corporate Development Paradigm in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9513-:d:1779770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.