IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ofr/wpaper/25-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of CCP Liquidity Demands on Clearing Members Under Stress

Author

Listed:
  • John Heilbron
  • Stathis Tompaidis

Abstract

During market stress, various demands on U.S. G-SIBs by central counterparties may further deplete the banks’ already stressed liquid and capital resources. (Working Paper no. 25-03).

Suggested Citation

  • John Heilbron & Stathis Tompaidis, 2025. "The Impact of CCP Liquidity Demands on Clearing Members Under Stress," Working Papers 25-03, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    • Handle: RePEc:ofr:wpaper:25-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.financialresearch.gov/working-papers/files/OFRwp-25-03_the-impact-of-ccp-liquidity-demands-on-clearing-members-under-stress.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iñaki Aldasoro & Fernando Avalos & Wenqian Huang, 2023. "Liquid assets at CCPs and systemic liquidity risks," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    2. Wenqian Huang & Elöd Takáts, 2024. "Model Risk at Central Counterparties: Is Skin in the Game a Game Changer?," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 20(3), pages 161-184, July.
    3. David Murphy & Michalis Vasios & Nick Vause, 2014. "Financial Stability Paper No 29: An investigation into the procyclicality of risk-based initial margin models," Bank of England Financial Stability Papers 29, Bank of England.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melinda Friesz & Kira Muratov-Szabó & Andrea Prepuk & Kata Váradi, 2021. "Risk Mutualization in Central Clearing: An Answer to the Cross-Guarantee Phenomenon from the Financial Stability Viewpoint," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Yuliya Baranova & Zijun Liu & Joseph Noss, 2016. "The role of collateral in supporting liquidity," Bank of England working papers 609, Bank of England.
    3. Luitgard Anna Maria Veraart & Iñaki Aldasoro, 2025. "Systemic risk in markets with multiple central counterparties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 214-262, January.
    4. Ms. Froukelien Wendt, 2015. "Central Counterparties: Addressing their Too Important to Fail Nature," IMF Working Papers 2015/021, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Garratt, Rodney & Zimmerman, Peter, 2020. "Centralized netting in financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Alexander, Carol & Kaeck, Andreas & Sumawong, Anannit, 2019. "A parsimonious parametric model for generating margin requirements for futures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 31-43.
    7. Thomas B. King & Travis D. Nesmith & Anna Paulson & Todd Prono, 2023. "Central Clearing and Systemic Liquidity Risk," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 19(4), pages 85-142, October.
    8. Corradin, Stefano & Heider, Florian & Hoerova, Marie, 2017. "On collateral: implications for financial stability and monetary policy," Working Paper Series 2107, European Central Bank.
    9. Edwin Budding & David Murphy, 2014. "Design Choices in Central Clearing: Issues Facing Small Advanced Economies," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Analytical Notes series AN2014/08, Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
    10. Injun Hwang & Baeho Kim, 2022. "A systemic change of measure from central clearing," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(9), pages 1738-1754, September.
    11. Nikil Chande & Nicholas Labelle, 2016. "Using Speed and Credit Limits to Address the Procyclicality of Initial Margin at Central Counterparties," Discussion Papers 16-18, Bank of Canada.
    12. David Murphy & Nicholas Vause, 2021. "A CBA of APC: analysing approaches to procyclicality reduction in CCP initial margin models," Bank of England working papers 950, Bank of England.
    13. Nicola Anderson & Lewis Webber & Joseph Noss & Daniel Beale & Liam Crowley-Reidy, 2015. "Financial Stability Paper 34: The resilience of financial market liquidity," Bank of England Financial Stability Papers 34, Bank of England.
    14. David Murphy & Michalis Vasios & Nicholas Vause, 2016. "A comparative analysis of tools to limit the procyclicality of initial margin requirements," Bank of England working papers 597, Bank of England.
    15. Glaser, Florian & Panz, Sven, 2016. "(Pro?)-cyclicality of collateral haircuts and systemic illiquidity," ESRB Working Paper Series 27, European Systemic Risk Board.
    16. Shi, Ruoshi & Zhao, Yanlong & Bao, Ying & Peng, Cheng, 2022. "Sensitivity-based Conditional Value at Risk (SCVaR): An efficient measurement of credit exposure for options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Kazeem O. Salaam, 2015. "Procyclicality Effects on Bank Lending Decisions: A Case Study of the British Banking Sector," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 185-194, April.
    18. Hitoshi Hayakawa, 2018. "Does a central clearing counterparty reduce liquidity needs?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 13(1), pages 9-50, April.
    19. Benos, Evangelos & Ferrara, Gerardo & Ranaldo, Angelo, 2022. "Collateral cycles," Bank of England working papers 966, Bank of England, revised 24 Oct 2022.
    20. Berlinger, Edina & Dömötör, Barbara & Illés, Ferenc, 2019. "Anti-cyclical versus risk-sensitive margin strategies in central clearing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 117-131.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ofr:wpaper:25-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corey Garriott (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofrgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.