IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stdaaa/2016-3-en.html

Big Data Measures of Well-Being: Evidence From a Google Well-Being Index in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Yann Algan

    (Sciences Po, Paris)

  • Elizabeth Beasley

    (Centre pour la recherche économique et ses applications)

  • Florian Guyot

    (Sciences Po, Paris)

  • Kazuhito Higa

    (Kyushu University)

  • Fabrice Murtin

    (OECD)

  • Claudia Senik

    (Paris School of Economics)

Abstract

We build an indicator of individual subjective well-being in the United States based on Google Trends. The indicator is a combination of keyword groups that are endogenously identified to fit with the weekly time-series of subjective well-being measures disseminated by Gallup Analytics. We find that keywords associated with job search, financial security, family life and leisure are the strongest predictors of the variations in subjective well-being. The model successfully predicts the out-of-sample evolution of most subjective well-being measures at a one-year horizon. Un indicateur de bien-être subjectif est construit pour les États-Unis sur la base des données de Google Trends. L’indicateur est une combinaison de mots-clés qui sont identifiés pour reproduire les séries hebdomadaires de bien-être subjectif de Gallup Analytics. Nous trouvons que les mots-clés associés à la recherche d’emploi, à la sécurité financière, à la vie de famille et aux loisirs sont les plus forts prédicteurs des variations du bien-être subjectif. Le modèle prévoit l’évolution hors échantillon de la plupart des mesures de bien-être à l’horizon d’un an.

Suggested Citation

  • Yann Algan & Elizabeth Beasley & Florian Guyot & Kazuhito Higa & Fabrice Murtin & Claudia Senik, 2016. "Big Data Measures of Well-Being: Evidence From a Google Well-Being Index in the United States," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2016/3, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2016/3-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlz9hpg0rd1-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnaud Joskin, 2017. "Working Paper 04-17 - Qu’est-ce qui compte pour les Belges ? Analyse des déterminants du bien-être individuel en Belgique [Working Paper 04-17 - Wat telt voor de Belgen? Analyse van de determinante," Working Papers 1704, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    2. K. I. Shaklein, 2018. "Monitoring of Global and National Consumer Trends — Importance Stage of Strategizing (Based on Rabbit Industry)," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., vol. 1(7).
    3. Dean Fantazzini & Marina Shakleina & Natalia Yuras, 2018. "Big Data for computing social well-being indices of the Russian population," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 43-66.
    4. Krzysztof Drachal & Daniel González Cortés, 2022. "Estimation of Lockdowns’ Impact on Well-Being in Selected Countries: An Application of Novel Bayesian Methods and Google Search Queries Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stdaaa:2016/3-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.