Choice of emergency health services: an experimental study
This paper analyses whether a misperception of symptoms’ severity of the condition by patients can help explain inappropriate use of hospitals’ emergency departments by non-urgent patients. We implement in an incentivized manner an exploratory economics experiment to elicit the degree of severity of five sets of symptoms. We ask participants to indicate the more suitable health service for each set of symptoms, before and after revealing the true degree of severity. Results show that there is an overestimation of the degree of severity of some clinical profiles, and when confronted with the real severity of those clinical profiles, in only half of the cases is the choice changed to other health services. Although exploratory, this study provides insights into the role that the misperception of symptoms severity plays in explaining emergency department inappropriate use and, at the same time, the potential limits of a policy focusing on this factor.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2016|
|Date of revision:||Apr 2017|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: NIMA, EEG - Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal|
Phone: +351 253601930
Fax: +351 253601380
Web page: http://nima.eeg.uminho.pt/
|Order Information:|| Postal: NIMA, EEG - Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal|
Web: http://nima.eeg.uminho.pt/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nim:nimawp:65/2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NIMA)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.