IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nim/nimawp/65-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choice of emergency health services: an experimental study

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The Portuguese national health service (NHS) is expected to provide safe and high quality care 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Everyday, patients with non-life threatening, short-term illnesses or health problems, for which they need convenient treatment or advice, use emergency care departments at hospitals. It is estimated that about one third could have been treated, or advised elsewhere, mainly in primary care (PC), community pharmacies or the national help phone line. This “inappropriate” use of emergency care departments represents an added cost, and a decreased efficiency for the Portuguese NHS. The literature suggests several explanations, either focusing on the system, or patients. This paper analyses whether a misperception of the severity of the health condition by the patients explain the excess demand. Results show that, in fact, there is an overestimation of the degree of severity of some clinical profiles, and therefore a preference for the use of emergency departments. However, when confronted with the real severity of those clinical profiles, only 50% of the cases change the choice of the emergency department (ED). It can also be derived from the results that socio-demographic characteristics and variables related to experience, with the services, and the clinical profiles are important determinants in the perception of severity of the clinical conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tânia Fernandes & Anabela Botelho & Isabel Correia Dias & Lígia Costa Pinto & Jorge Teixeira & Paula Veiga, 2016. "Choice of emergency health services: an experimental study," NIMA Working Papers 65, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
  • Handle: RePEc:nim:nimawp:65/2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www3.eeg.uminho.pt/publications/NIMAwp65.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Berchet, 2015. "Emergency Care Services: Trends, Drivers and Interventions to Manage the Demand," OECD Health Working Papers 83, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sagan, Anna & Kowalska-Bobko, Iwona & Mokrzycka, Anna, 2016. "The 2015 emergency care reform in Poland: Some improvements, some unmet demands and some looming conflicts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1220-1225.
    2. Norma B. Coe & Jing Guo & R. Tamara Konetzka & Courtney Harold Van Houtven, 2019. "What is the marginal benefit of payment‐induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 678-692, May.
    3. Álvaro S Almeida & Joana Vales, 2017. "Models Of Primary Care Organization And The Use Of Emergency Departments," FEP Working Papers 598, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Pinchbeck, Edward W., 2019. "Convenient primary care and emergency hospital utilisation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Hélène Colineaux & Fanny Le Querrec & Laure Pourcel & Jean-Christophe Gallart & Olivier Azéma & Thierry Lang & Michelle Kelly-Irving & Sandrine Charpentier & Sébastien Lamy, 2018. "Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(3), pages 397-407, April.
    6. Van den Heede, Koen & Quentin, Wilm & Dubois, Cécile & Devriese, Stephan & Van de Voorde, Carine, 2017. "The 2016 proposal for the reorganisation of urgent care provision in Belgium: A political struggle to co-locate primary care providers and emergency departments," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 339-345.
    7. Mauro Laudicella & Paolo Li Donni, 2022. "The dynamic interdependence in the demand of primary and emergency secondary care: A hidden Markov approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 521-536, April.
    8. Elena Lucchese, 2020. "Where are you? The problem of location during emergencies," Working Papers 439, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2020.
    9. Zeynep Or & Anne Penneau, 2017. "Analyse des déterminants territoriaux du recours aux urgences non suivi d’une hospitalisation," Working Papers DT72, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Sep 2017.
    10. Pinchbeck, Edward W., 2019. "Convenient primary care and emergency hospital utilisation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Or, Zeynep & Penneau, Anne, 2018. "A Multilevel Analysis of the determinants of emergency care visits by the elderly in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 908-914.
    12. Akkan, Can & Karadayi, Melis Almula & Ekinci, Yeliz & Ülengin, Füsun & Uray, Nimet & Karaosmanoğlu, Elif, 2020. "Efficiency analysis of emergency departments in metropolitan areas," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Elena Lucchese, 2020. "It could be worse...it could be raining: Ambulance response time and health outcomes," Working Papers 429, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    14. Van den Heede, Koen & Van de Voorde, Carine, 2016. "Interventions to reduce emergency department utilisation: A review of reviews," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1337-1349.
    15. Baier, Natalie & Geissler, Alexander & Bech, Mickael & Bernstein, David & Cowling, Thomas E. & Jackson, Terri & van Manen, Johan & Rudkjøbing, Andreas & Quentin, Wilm, 2019. "Emergency and urgent care systems in Australia, Denmark, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands – Analyzing organization, payment and reforms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Emergency department demand; experimental economics; elicitation of beliefs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nim:nimawp:65/2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NIMA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nima.eeg.uminho.pt/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.