IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/net/wpaper/1127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Whose and What Chatter Matters? The Impact of Tweets on Movie Sales Framework

Author

Abstract

Social broadcasting networks such as Twitter in the U.S. and Weibo in China are transforming the way online word-of-mouth (WOM) is disseminated and consumed in the digital age. We investigate whether and how Twitter WOM affects movie sales by estimating a dynamic panel data model using publicly available data and well known machine learning algorithms. We find that chatter on Twitter does matter, however, the magnitude and direction of the effect depends on whom the WOM is from and what the WOM is about. Measuring Twitter users' influence by how many followers they have, we find that the effect of WOM from more influential users is significantly larger than that from less influential users. In support of some recent findings about the importance of WOM valence on product sales, we also find that positive Twitter WOM increases movie sales while negative WOM decreases them. Interestingly, we find that the strongest effect on movie sales comes from those tweets where the authors express their intention to watch a certain movie. We attribute this to the dual effects of such intention tweets on movie sales: the direct effect through the WOM author's own purchase behavior, and the indirect effect through either the awareness effect or the persuasive effect of the WOM on its recipients. Our findings provide new perspectives to understand the effect of WOM on product sales and have important managerial implications. For example, our study reveals the potential values of monitoring people's intention and sentiment on Twitter and identifying influential users for companies wishing to harness the power of social broadcasting networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizao Liu & Huaxia Rui & Andrew Whinston, 2011. "Whose and What Chatter Matters? The Impact of Tweets on Movie Sales Framework," Working Papers 11-27, NET Institute, revised Nov 2011.
  • Handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.netinst.org/Liu_Rui_11_27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Twitter; word-of-mouth; dynamic panel data;

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising
    • C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nicholas Economides). General contact details of provider: http://www.NETinst.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.