IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ncs/wpaper/001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Agent Behavior and Efficiency in Open and Closed Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan M. Holthausen

    () (Department of Economics, North Carolina State University)

  • Theofanis Tsoulouhas

    () (Department of Economics, North Carolina State University)

Abstract

This paper develops a novel model of agent behavior in organizations in order to compare the efficiency of “open” versus “closed” organizations. Closed organizations “screen” potential agents before admitting them while open organizations do not. Both have the option to “sort” (audit) individual behavior after observing aggregate outcome. Each agent is intrinsically “good,” “bad” or “ugly,” but can behave as any of the three types. Screening allows the organization to deny entry to the worst agent types, while sorting allows the organization to penalize opportunistic misbehavior by the agents. We show that both organizations may sort in equilibrium. When the sorting cost per agent is constant or exhibits economies of scale, surprisingly, both organizations sort the same number of agents, which leads agents of the same type to behave uniformly across organizations. However, agent behavior across intrinsic types may or may not be uniform. Interestingly, there is no equilibrium in which all agent types behave as good. When all agent types behave as bad or all behave as ugly, and an equilibrium exists in both organizations, closed organizations are less efficient from the organization’s perspective than open ones. When all agent types behave as ugly, closed organizations are socially inefficient as well. If agent behavior is a mixture of types, then closed organizations can be efficient because they screen out some of the worst agent types in advance. When organizations can precommit to a sorting frequency, more equilibria exist; for instance, all agent types may behave as good.

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan M. Holthausen & Theofanis Tsoulouhas, 2004. "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Agent Behavior and Efficiency in Open and Closed Organizations," Working Paper Series 001, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2004.
  • Handle: RePEc:ncs:wpaper:001 Note: First draft 2002-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/ncsu/economics/RePEc/pdf/GoodBadAndUgly.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Maskin & Jean Tirole, 2004. "The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 1034-1054.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizations; agent behavior; organizational efficiency; screening; sorting; auditing;

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ncs:wpaper:001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theofanis Tsoulouhas). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dencsus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.