Evidence on the Determinants of the Choice between Wage Posting and Wage Bargaining
Some workers bargain with prospective employers before accepting a job. Others face a posted wage as a take-it-or-leave-it opportunity. Theories of wage formation point to substantial differences in labor-market equilibrium between bargained and posted wages. We surveyed a representative sample of U.S. workers to inquire about the wage determination process at the time they were hired into their current or most recent jobs. A third of the respondents reported bargaining over pay before accepting their current jobs. About a third of workers had precise information about pay when they first met with their employers, a sign of wage posting. About 40 percent of workers could have remained on their earlier jobs at the time they accepted their current jobs, indicating a more favorable bargaining position than is held by unemployed job-seekers. Our analysis of the distribution of wages shows that wage dispersion is higher among workers who bargained for their wages. Wages are higher among bargainers than non-bargainers, after adjusting for the differing compositions of the groups. Our results on wages give substantial support to the job-ladder model--workers who had the option to remain at their earlier jobs when they took their current jobs can earn higher wages than those without that option.
|Date of creation:||May 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||published as “Evidence on the Incidence of Wage Posting, Wage Bargaining, and On-the-Job Search” (with Alan B. Krueger), AEJ: Macroeconomics , October 2012, 4(4) 56–67|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Guido Menzio, 2007.
"A Theory of Partially Directed Search,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(5), pages 748-769, October.
- Giuseppe Moscarini & Fabien Postel-Vinay, 2009.
"The Timing of Labor Market Expansions: New Facts and a New Hypothesis,"
in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2008, Volume 23, pages 1-51
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Fabien Postel-Vinay & Giuseppe Moscarini, 2008. "The Timing of Labor Market Expansions: New Facts and a New Hypothesis," 2008 Meeting Papers 326, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Robert Shimer, 2010. "Labor Markets and Business Cycles," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9217, 01-2013.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.