IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/fa18eaf8a4de4ee8a439e81a46798a47.html

Exploring the Potential Role of Staff Surveys in School Leader Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Whitney Kozakowski
  • Brian Gill
  • Menbere Shiferaw

Abstract

The Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory partnered with the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) to explore the potential use of teacher surveys in school leader evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitney Kozakowski & Brian Gill & Menbere Shiferaw, "undated". "Exploring the Potential Role of Staff Surveys in School Leader Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fa18eaf8a4de4ee8a439e81a4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:fa18eaf8a4de4ee8a439e81a46798a47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/education/2021/rel_2021117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:7453 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Editors, 2016. "16 and all that," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 16(1), pages 3-4, March.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:7454 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Stephen Lipscomb & Hanley Chiang & Brian Gill, "undated". "Value-Added Estimates for Phase 1 of the Pennsylvania Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot," Mathematica Policy Research Reports dacd1fdea4354222868fb2fef, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:7445 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hanley Chiang & Stephen Lipscomb & Brian Gill, 2016. "Is School Value Added Indicative of Principal Quality?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 11(3), pages 283-309, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moira McCullough & Stephen Lipscomb & Hanley Chiang & Brian Gill, "undated". "Do Principals' Professional Practice Ratings Reflect Their Contributions to Student Achievement? Evidence from Pennsylvania's Framework for Leadership," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 23864abe140c4b658d1ba88d4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Baker, Laurence C & McClellan, Mark B, 2001. "Managed Care, Health Care Quality, and Regulation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 715-741, June.
    3. Wills, Gabrielle, 2016. "Principal leadership changes and their consequences for school performance in South Africa," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 108-124.
    4. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    5. Brian Gill, 2022. "What Should The Future Of Educational Accountability Look Like?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 1232-1239, September.
    6. Zhimin Liao & Xiaofang Chen, 2011. "Why the Entry Regulation of Mobile Phone Manufacturing in China Collapsed: The Impact of Technological Innovation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 207-228.
    7. Jack Lucas & Alison Smith, 2019. "Which Policy Issues Matter in Canadian Municipalities? A Survey of Municipal Politicians," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 12(8), March.
    8. Bartanen, Brendan & Husain, Aliza N., 2022. "Connected networks in principal value-added models," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Ayres, Ian & Vars, Fredrick E, 2000. "Determinants of Citations to Articles in Elite Law Reviews," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 427-450, January.
    10. Wiljan van den Berge, 2019. "Automatic Reaction – What Happens to Workers at Firms that Automate?," CPB Discussion Paper 390, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Susanna Loeb & Michael S. Christian & Heather Hough & Robert H. Meyer & Andrew B. Rice & Martin R. West, 2019. "School Differences in Social–Emotional Learning Gains: Findings From the First Large-Scale Panel Survey of Students," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(5), pages 507-542, October.
    12. Kristina M. Bott & Alexander Cappelen & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2017. "You've Got Mail: A Randomised Field Experiment on Tax Evasion," Working Papers 2017-051, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    13. International Monetary Fund, 2013. "France: Financial Sector Assessment Program—Technical Note on Stress Testing the Banking Sector," IMF Staff Country Reports 2013/185, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Gregor Pfeifer & Fabian Wahl & Martyna Marczak, 2018. "Illuminating the World Cup effect: Night lights evidence from South Africa," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 887-920, November.
    15. Geddes, Rick & Zak, Paul J, 2002. "The Rule of One-Third," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 119-137, January.
    16. Matthew Manning, 2016. "Markets and operations: 2016 Q3," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 56(3), pages 146-154.
    17. David M. Reeb & Yuzhao Zhang & Wanli Zhao, 2014. "Insider Trading in Supervised Industries," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(3), pages 529-559.
    18. Chintamani Mahapatra, 2016. "US–Iran Nuclear Deal: Cohorts and Challenger," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 3(1), pages 36-46, March.
    19. Kar, Ashim Kumar, 2016. "Aid and Human Development: Is There A Role for Good Policy Environment?," MPRA Paper 95433, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    20. Tomoo Kikuchi & Takehiro Masumoto, 2016. "Financial Reforms in Myanmar and Japan's Engagement," Working Papers DP-2016-27, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:fa18eaf8a4de4ee8a439e81a46798a47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Cindy George to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.