IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v12y2019i8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Policy Issues Matter in Canadian Municipalities? A Survey of Municipal Politicians

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Lucas

    (The University of Calgary)

  • Alison Smith

    (The University of Toronto)

Abstract

Whether it’s a big city or a small town, all Canadian municipalities have core issues that their elected politicians are concerned about. Regardless of size, the daily business of a municipality must be managed and policies determined about such bread-and-butter issues as garbage collection, snow removal, wastewater and sewage, fire protection, economic development and fixing potholes. However, when size increases, so do the layers of issues that engage municipal politicians. This paper examines the results of a cross-Canada survey of more than 1,000 mayors and councillors from communities ranging in population size from 5,000 to more than two million. With an increase in population size, the numbers and complexity of issues creep up as well. Tiny municipalities typically aren’t concerned with issues such as immigrant settlement, homelessness and public transit. Those issues are much more pressing for larger municipalities. A focus on some types of issues, such as public transit, grows right alongside population growth. The physical size of large municipalities means they contain a population whose needs are naturally more diverse than they are in smaller cities, towns and villages, thus shifting politicians’ concerns to such things as homelessness and climate change. However, issues such as relations with Indigenous people and climate change also tend to hold regional, not just municipal, importance. They may be extremely important to a small municipality because of its geographic location and less important in a larger municipality located elsewhere. For example, municipal politicians in British Columbia reflect regional concerns with their emphasis in the survey on the importance of tackling homelessness, affordable housing, climate change and Indigenous relations. Yet, next door in Alberta, Indigenous relations and climate change ranked in the survey as being of low importance, along with climate change, despite the presence of two cities in the province with populations hovering around the million mark. The number one issue for municipalities regardless of size is economic development, since job creation and attracting investment are key for a healthy municipality regardless of its location or size. And nearly every politician surveyed listed planning, water supply and transportation infrastructure (roads, highways and bridges) as being of deep importance to their communities. Of almost equal importance in the survey were a second slate of issues including emergency planning, parks and recreation, public health, solid waste removal and policing. The results of this survey are intended to lay the groundwork for future researchers who want to focus on specific problems in the area of urban policy-making. Those who want to study the bread-and-butter issues can do so among a wide range and size of municipalities, knowing that these issues are vital to all. Those with an interest in homelessness and immigrant populations can focus on the big cities while being assured they are not missing out on key points among smaller communities. This survey will be highly beneficial for researchers in urban policy issues as it will help them to decide where to look and exactly what to look for.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Lucas & Alison Smith, 2019. "Which Policy Issues Matter in Canadian Municipalities? A Survey of Municipal Politicians," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 12(8), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:12:y:2019:i:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Canadian-Municipalities-Lucas-Smith.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Editors, 2016. "16 and all that," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(1), pages 3-4, March.
    2. Andrew Sancton, 2016. "The False Panacea of City Charters? A Political Perspective on the Case of Toronto," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 9(3), January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baker, Laurence C & McClellan, Mark B, 2001. "Managed Care, Health Care Quality, and Regulation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 715-741, June.
    2. Sascha O. Becker & Irena Grosfeld & Pauline Grosjean & Nico Voigtländer & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2020. "Forced Migration and Human Capital: Evidence from Post-WWII Population Transfers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(5), pages 1430-1463, May.
    3. International Monetary Fund, 2013. "France: Financial Sector Assessment Program—Technical Note on Stress Testing the Banking Sector," IMF Staff Country Reports 2013/185, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Freudling, Maximilian, 2020. "Awareness of intrinsic motivation in leadership," Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology, vol. 8, pages 134-151.
    5. Gregor Pfeifer & Fabian Wahl & Martyna Marczak, 2018. "Illuminating the World Cup effect: Night lights evidence from South Africa," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 887-920, November.
    6. Geddes, Rick & Zak, Paul J, 2002. "The Rule of One-Third," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 119-137, January.
    7. Robert A. Margo, 1998. "Review of Lance E. Davis et al., In Pursuit of Leviathan: Technology, Institutions, Productivity, and Profits in American Whaling, 1816-1906," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(2), pages 452-481, April.
    8. Manning, Matthew, 2016. "Markets and operations: 2016 Q3," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 56(3), pages 146-154.
    9. David M. Reeb & Yuzhao Zhang & Wanli Zhao, 2014. "Insider Trading in Supervised Industries," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(3), pages 529-559.
    10. Chintamani Mahapatra, 2016. "US–Iran Nuclear Deal: Cohorts and Challenger," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 3(1), pages 36-46, March.
    11. Zhimin Liao & Xiaofang Chen, 2011. "Why the Entry Regulation of Mobile Phone Manufacturing in China Collapsed: The Impact of Technological Innovation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 207-228.
    12. Al-Ani, Ayad & Stumpp, Stefan, 2016. "Rebalancing interests and power structures on crowdworking platforms," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20.
    13. Zack Taylor & Alec Dobson, 2020. "Power and Purpose:Canadian Municipal Law in Transition," IMFG Papers 47, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
    14. Kar, Ashim Kumar, 2016. "Aid and Human Development: Is There A Role for Good Policy Environment?," MPRA Paper 95433, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
    15. Whitney Kozakowski & Brian Gill & Menbere Shiferaw, "undated". "Exploring the Potential Role of Staff Surveys in School Leader Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fa18eaf8a4de4ee8a439e81a4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Tomoo Kikuchi & Takehiro Masumoto, 2016. "Financial Reforms in Myanmar and Japan's Engagement," Working Papers DP-2016-27, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    17. Purvi Sevak & Frank Martin & Gina Livermore & Todd Honeycutt & Eric Morris, "undated". "Kentucky Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) Project Demonstration: Final Evaluation Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9c4c2567d68f48c2be3401137, Mathematica Policy Research.
    18. Bott, Kristina Maria & Cappelen, Alexander W. & Sørensen, Erik Ø. & Tungodden, Bertil, 2017. "You’ve got mail: A randomised Field experiment on tax evasion," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 10/2017, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    19. Duchini, Emma & Simion, Stefania & Turrell, Arthur, 2020. "Pay Transparency and Cracks in the Glass Ceiling," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1311, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    20. Ayres, Ian & Vars, Fredrick E, 2000. "Determinants of Citations to Articles in Elite Law Reviews," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 427-450, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:12:y:2019:i:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.