IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/22008.html

Dynamic Optimization in Peer-To-Peer Transportation with Acceptance Probability Approximation

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemonde Ausseil
  • Marlin W. Ulmer
  • Jennifer A. Pazour

Abstract

Crowdsourced transportation by independent suppliers (or drivers) is central to urban delivery and mobility platforms. While utilizing crowdsourced resources has several advantages, it comes with the challenge that suppliers are not bound to assignments made by the platforms. In practice, suppliers often decline offered service requests, e.g., due to the required travel detour, the expected tip, or the area a request is located. This leads to inconveniences for the platform (ineffective assignments), the corresponding customer (delayed service), and also the suppliers themselves (non-fitting assignment, less revenue). In this work, we show how approximating suppliers’ acceptance behavior by analyzing their past decision making can alleviate these inconveniences. To this end, we propose a dynamic matching problem where suppliers’ acceptances or rejections of offers are uncertain and depend on a variety of request attributes. Suppliers who accept an offered request from the platform are assigned and reenter the system after service looking for another offer. Suppliers declining an offer stay idle to wait for another offer, but leave after a limited time if no acceptable offer is made. Every supplier decision reveals partial information about the suppliers’ acceptance behavior, and in this paper, we present a corresponding mathematical model and a solution approach that translates supplier responses into the probability of a specific supplier to accept a specific future offer and uses this information to optimize subsequent offering decisions. We show that our approach leads to overall more successful assignments, more revenue for the platform and most of the suppliers, and less waiting for the customers to be served. We also show that considering individual supplier behavior can lead to unfair treatment of more agreeable suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemonde Ausseil & Marlin W. Ulmer & Jennifer A. Pazour, 2022. "Dynamic Optimization in Peer-To-Peer Transportation with Acceptance Probability Approximation," FEMM Working Papers 22008, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:22008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2022/2022_08.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mourad, Abood & Puchinger, Jakob & Chu, Chengbin, 2019. "A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 323-346.
    2. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    3. Silviya Valeva & Mike Hewitt & Barrett W. Thomas, 2017. "A matheuristic for workforce planning with employee learning and stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(24), pages 7380-7397, December.
    4. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, Enero-Abr.
    5. Nieto-Isaza, Santiago & Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2022. "The value of stochastic crowd resources and strategic location of mini-depots for last-mile delivery: A Benders decomposition approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 62-79.
    6. Xi Chen & Jianjun Gao & Dongdong Ge & Zizhuo Wang, 2022. "Bayesian dynamic learning and pricing with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3125-3142, August.
    7. Junyu Cao & Mariana Olvera-Cravioto & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "Last-Mile Shared Delivery: A Discrete Sequential Packing Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1466-1497, November.
    8. Soeffker, Ninja & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Mattfeld, Dirk C., 2022. "Stochastic dynamic vehicle routing in the light of prescriptive analytics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 801-820.
    9. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    10. Amirmahdi Tafreshian & Neda Masoud & Yafeng Yin, 2020. "Frontiers in Service Science: Ride Matching for Peer-to-Peer Ride Sharing: A Review and Future Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2-3), pages 44-60, June.
    11. Ulmer, Marlin & Nowak, Maciek & Mattfeld, Dirk & Kaminski, Bogumił, 2020. "Binary driver-customer familiarity in service routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 477-493.
    12. Xinyu Cao & Juanjuan Zhang, 2021. "Preference Learning and Demand Forecast," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 62-79, January.
    13. Marlin W. Ulmer & Dirk C. Mattfeld & Felix Köster, 2018. "Budgeting Time for Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Customer Requests," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 20-37, January.
    14. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    15. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    16. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    17. Nicholas D. Kullman & Martin Cousineau & Justin C. Goodson & Jorge E. Mendoza, 2022. "Dynamic Ride-Hailing with Electric Vehicles," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 775-794, May.
    18. Huan Jin & Mike Hewitt & Barrett W. Thomas, 2018. "Workforce grouping and assignment with learning-by-doing and knowledge transfer," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(14), pages 4968-4982, July.
    19. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    20. Francisco Castro & Hamid Nazerzadeh & Chiwei Yan, 2020. "Matching queues with reneging: a product form solution," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 359-385, December.
    21. Yixiao Huang & Lei Zhao & Warren B. Powell & Yue Tong & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2019. "Optimal Learning for Urban Delivery Fleet Allocation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 623-641, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ausseil, Rosemonde & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2024. "Online acceptance probability approximation in peer-to-peer transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Rosemonde Ausseil & Jennifer A. Pazour & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Supplier Menus for Dynamic Matching in Peer-to-Peer Transportation Platforms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1304-1326, September.
    3. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2022. "Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 539-556.
    4. Martin Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations—an update," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(2), pages 639-661, December.
    5. Zhang, Jian & Woensel, Tom Van, 2023. "Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2024. "Compensation guarantees in crowdsourced delivery: Impact on platform and driver welfare," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Martin W.P Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Li, Ruijie & Liu, Yang & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "Allocation problem in cross-platform ride-hail integration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Alexander Bosse & Marlin W. Ulmer & Emanuele Manni & Dirk C. Mattfeld, 2022. "Dynamic Priority Rules for Combining On-Demand Passenger Transportation and Transportation of Goods," FEMM Working Papers 22006, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    10. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    11. Aliaa Alnaggar & Fatma Gzara & James Bookbinder, 2025. "Heatmap Design for Probabilistic Driver Repositioning in Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 81-103, January.
    12. Bosse, Alexander & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Manni, Emanuele & Mattfeld, Dirk C., 2023. "Dynamic priority rules for combining on-demand passenger transportation and transportation of goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 399-408.
    13. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2019. "When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hierarchical approach for peer-to-peer logistics platforms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-23.
    15. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2021. "A multi-period analysis of the integrated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 483-499.
    16. Gao, Jie & Zhu, Yongqiu & Cats, Oded, 2025. "Uncertainties in shared mobility optimization problems: Survey and perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Horner, Hannah & Pazour, Jennifer & Mitchell, John E., 2021. "Optimizing driver menus under stochastic selection behavior for ridesharing and crowdsourced delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Adam Behrendt & Martin Savelsbergh & He Wang, 2023. "A Prescriptive Machine Learning Method for Courier Scheduling on Crowdsourced Delivery Platforms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 889-907, July.
    19. Fan, Wenbo & Gu, Weihua & Xu, Meng, 2024. "Optimal design of ride-pooling as on-demand feeder services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Li, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yang, 2021. "Optimizing flexible one-to-two matching in ride-hailing systems with boundedly rational users," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:22008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Administrators at FWW (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwmagde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.