IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mad/wpaper/2026-293.html

Patent Valuation under Fragile Institutional Enforcement: A Continuous-Time Markov Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gautami Parate

    (Madras School of Economics, Gandhi Mandapam Road, Behind Government Data Centre, Kotturpuram, Chennai, 600025, India.)

  • Arpita Choudhary

    ((Corresponding author), Madras School of Economics, Gandhi Mandapam Road, Behind Government Data Centre, Kotturpuram, Chennai, 600025)

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations have become integral to corporate strategy, investor decision-making, and regulatory oversight. ESG violations—such as environmental harm, governance failures, and social misconduct—pose substantial reputational, financial, and legal risks. This study develops a machine learning-based framework for the early detection of ESG policy violations using the World Benchmarking Alliance’s Nature Benchmark dataset (2022–2024), covering 816 firms across more than 20 industries. To address the pronounced class imbalance inherent in ESG violation data, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is applied. Three classification models—Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest—are evaluated. The Random Forest model demonstrates the most robust performance, achieving a superior balance between accuracy and recall. Model interpretability is ensured through feature importance measures and SHAP values, which identify key ESG dimensions and industry-specific drivers associated with violations. Overall, the findings highlight the effectiveness of combining ensemble learning, resampling techniques, and explainable machine learning to support scalable and proactive ESG risk assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gautami Parate & Arpita Choudhary, 2026. "Patent Valuation under Fragile Institutional Enforcement: A Continuous-Time Markov Approach," Working Papers 2026-293, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
  • Handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2026-293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mse.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Working-paper-293.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    2. Xu, Chong & Tao, Miaomiao & Qi, Lingli & Roubaud, David, 2025. "Can green CEOs trigger the green premium effect?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Misra, Shekhar & Mishra, Saurabh, 2026. "Environmental, social, and governance performances, media sentiments, and shareholder wealth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Zhu, Bo & Wang, Yiwei, 2024. "Green governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    5. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    6. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    7. Schawlowski Dan Michael, 2025. "The Correlation between Employee Benefits and Financial Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 294-303.
    8. Florian Kiesel & Felix Lücke, 2019. "ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 263-290, August.
    9. Yang Gao & Stephen Satchell & Nandini Srivastava, 2020. "Styles through a convergent/divergent lens: the curious case of ESG," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 4-12, February.
    10. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    11. Eunice Ngozi Ajuluchukwu & Usani Joseph Ofem & Stephen Undie & Mecry Akeke & Eno E. Elogbo & Fabian Ugbe Udida & Patricia Akwaya Olom & Mary Rose Eze & Bessong Bessong, 2026. "Exploring the impact of green human resource management practices enabled by artificial intelligence on organizational sustainability: the mediating roles of digital literacy and green organizational climate," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Kwon, He-Boong & Lee, Jooh, 2019. "Exploring the differential impact of environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and corporate reputation on market valuation in high-tech-oriented firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Luo Fan & Mohammad Tazul Islam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Svetlana Popova & Natalia Turdyeva, 2024. "Environmental and Climate Factors of Corporate Lending in Russia," Bank of Russia Working Paper Series wps143, Bank of Russia.
    16. Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    18. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Imen Khanchel & Naima Lassoued & Rym Gargoury, 2023. "CSR and firm value: is CSR valuable during the COVID 19 crisis in the French market?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(2), pages 575-601, June.
    20. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2022. "The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2026-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geetha G (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mseacin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.