IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luc/wpaper/25-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leading Ladies, Lagging Ratings? Gender Bias in Evaluations of Movies

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Litina

    (University of Macedonia, GR)

  • Georgios Mavropoulos

    (University of Macedonia, GR)

  • Skerdilajda Zanaj

    (DEM, Université du Luxembourg)

Abstract

The movie industry provides a unique setting to analyze consumer-driven gender biases, as it allows clear identification of how the gender of leading actors, directors and producers influences movie performance outcomes. Using a hand-collected dataset of over 5,000 globally produced movies from 1998 to 2008, we document a distinct non-linear relationship between female representation in leading roles and audience ratings. Specifically, ratings initially decline significantly as the number of female leads increases, reaching a turning point at approximately two female leads, beyond which ratings stabilize or slightly improve (convex pattern). This negative impact on audience ratings is primarily driven by male viewers, whose proportional presence diminishes as female representation grows. In contrast, professional film awards exhibit an opposite, concave pattern, peaking significantly at two female leads. Employing a Heckman- like selection test, we further reveal that audience gender biases persist even after accounting for the selective attrition of male viewers from movies featuring female leads.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Litina & Georgios Mavropoulos & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2025. "Leading Ladies, Lagging Ratings? Gender Bias in Evaluations of Movies," DEM Discussion Paper Series 25-12, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:25-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10993/65197
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gender diversity; gender biases; movie industry.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:25-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Legrand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crcrplu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.