IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/911.html

The Luxembourg Consumption Study (LCS): Feasibility and First Steps

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Vecchi

  • Giulia Mancini

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of establishing a Luxembourg Consumption Study (LCS) database, which would serve as a consumption-focused counterpart to the existing Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) and Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) databases. The proposed LCS would, like its predecessors, act as a repository of harmonized microdata across multiple countries and time periods, including one or more standardized welfare indicators that are comparable across surveys. The focus on consumption would add an important dimension to the analysis of living standards in LIS core countries, and it would create common ground between areas of the world that subscribe to different monetary welfare indicators. The first section of the report examines the feasibility of creating a repository of harmonized household-level consumption data that enables comparisons across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. The second section of the report assesses the impact of variations in the definition of the consumption aggregate—specifically, differences in the estimation of consumption flows for owner-occupied dwellings and durable goods—on key poverty estimates, with a particular focus on poverty profiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Vecchi & Giulia Mancini, 2025. "The Luxembourg Consumption Study (LCS): Feasibility and First Steps," LIS Working papers 911, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/911.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Bebczuk & Leonardo Gasparini & Noelia Garbero & Julian Amendolaggine, 2015. "Understanding the Determinants of Household Saving: Micro Evidence for Latin America," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0189, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    2. Beegle, Kathleen & De Weerdt, Joachim & Friedman, Jed & Gibson, John, 2012. "Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: Experimental results from Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 3-18.
    3. Garner, Thesia I. & Short, Kathleen, 2009. "Accounting for owner-occupied dwelling services: Aggregates and distributions," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 233-248, September.
    4. Carlos Felipe Balcázar & Lidia Ceriani & Sergio Olivieri & Marco Ranzani, 2017. "Rent‐Imputation for Welfare Measurement: A Review of Methodologies and Empirical Findings," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(4), pages 881-898, December.
    5. Jean Olson Lanjouw & Peter Lanjouw, 2001. "How to Compare Apples And Oranges: Poverty Measurement Based on Different Definitions of Consumption," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 47(1), pages 25-42, March.
    6. Nicola Amendola & Giovanni Vecchi, 2022. "Durable goods and welfare measurement," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1179-1211, September.
    7. Ravallion, Martin, 2016. "The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement, and Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190212773.
    8. Joachim De Weerdt & Kathleen Beegle & Jed Friedman & John Gibson, 2016. "The Challenge of Measuring Hunger through Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(4), pages 727-758.
    9. Angus Deaton & Salman Zaidi, 2002. "Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 14101, April.
    10. Deaton,Angus & Muellbauer,John, 1980. "Economics and Consumer Behavior," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521296762, November.
    11. FAO & World Bank, 2018. "Food Data Collection in Household Consumption and Expenditure Surveys," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 32503, April.
    12. Menno Pradhan, 2009. "Welfare Analysis with a Proxy Consumption Measure: Evidence from a Repeated Experiment in Indonesia," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 30(Special I), pages 391-417, December.
    13. Deaton, A. & Zaidi, S., 1999. "Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis," Papers 192, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Development Studies.
    14. Nicola Amendola & Giulia Mancini & Silvia Redaelli & Giovanni Vecchi, 2025. "Deflation by Expenditure Components: A Harmless Adjustment?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(1), February.
    15. Giulia Cifaldi & Andrea Neri, 2013. "Asking income and consumption questions in the same survey: what are the risks?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 908, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thesia Garner & Peter F. Lanjouw & Brett Matsumoto & Gintare Mazeikaite & Teresa Munzi & Jörg Neugschwender & Heba Omar & Jake Schild, 2025. "Building a Comparable Measure of Consumption: Concepts and Measurement Challenges Faced by Emerging and Advanced Economies," LIS Working papers 912, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    2. Hai‐Anh H. Dang & Talip Kilic & Kseniya Abanokova & Calogero Carletto, 2025. "Poverty Imputation in Contexts Without Consumption Data: A Revisit With Further Refinements," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(1), February.
    3. Abate, Gashaw T. & de Brauw, Alan & Hirvonen, Kalle & Wolle, Abdulazize, 2023. "Measuring consumption over the phone: Evidence from a survey experiment in urban Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Amendola,Nicola & Belotti,Federico & Edo,María & Marco Ranzani & Giovanni Vecchi, 2024. "Poverty Lines and Spatial Differences in the Cost of Living," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10978, The World Bank.
    5. Luc Christiaensen & Ethan Ligon & Thomas Pave Sohnesen, 2022. "Consumption Subaggregates Should Not Be Used to Measure Poverty," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(2), pages 413-432.
    6. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Kilic, Talip & Abanokova, Kseniya & Carletto, Calogero, 2024. "Imputing Poverty Indicators without Consumption Data: An Exploratory Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 17136, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Annus Azhar & Imtiaz Ahmad, 2024. "Poverty Dynamics: How Well Do Pakistan’s Provinces Compare?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 429-447, March.
    8. Massimo Baldini & Giulia Mancini & Giovanni Vecchi, 2018. "No country for young people. Poverty and Age in Italy, 1948-2018," Department of Economics 0128, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    9. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Nguyen, Cuong Viet, 2025. "Employing Data Imputation to Track Poverty and Welfare Trends over Extended Time Periods: An Application to a Poorer Country," IZA Discussion Papers 18236, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Ameye, Hannah & De Weerdt, Joachim & Gibson, John, 2021. "Measuring macro- and micronutrient consumption in multi-purpose surveys: Evidence from a survey experiment in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Pape, Utz & Verme, Paolo, 2023. "Measuring Poverty in Forced Displacement Contexts," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1245, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Dean Jolliffe & Espen Beer Prydz, 2016. "Estimating international poverty lines from comparable national thresholds," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 185-198, June.
    13. Ligon, Ethan & Christiaensen, Luc & Sohnesen, Thomas P, 2020. "Should Consumption Sub-Aggregates be Used to Measure Poverty?," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9b9929jh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    14. Hassine, Nadia Belhaj, 2014. "Economic inequality in the Arab region," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6911, The World Bank.
    15. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Kilic, Talip & Hlasny, Vladimir & Abanokova, Kseniya & Carletto, Calogero, 2024. "Using Survey-to-Survey Imputation to Fill Poverty Data Gaps at a Low Cost: Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 16792, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Pape,Utz Johann & Wollburg,Philip Randolph, 2019. "Estimation of Poverty in Somalia Using Innovative Methodologies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8735, The World Bank.
    17. Achille Lemmi & Donatella Grassi & Alessandra Masi & Nicoletta Pannuzi & Andrea Regoli, 2019. "Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 299-330, January.
    18. Arouna Kouandou & Sophie Legras, 2025. "Welfare Impacts of Mobile Banking Use in Rural Africa: Gender Disaggregated Evidence from Eight Sub-Saharan African Countries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(4), pages 812-838, August.
    19. Brian A'Hearn & Nicola Amendola & Giovanni Vecchi, 2016. "On Historical Household Budgets," Rivista di storia economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 137-176.
    20. Hai-Anh H. Dang & Peter F. Lanjouw, 2023. "Regression-based imputation for poverty measurement in data-scarce settings," Chapters, in: Jacques Silber (ed.), Research Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation, chapter 13, pages 141-150, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.