IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kob/dpaper/dp2024-14.html

Informality and Dynamism of Microbusinesses in Africa: Possible Causalities

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroyuki Hino

    (Office of Global Affairs, Duke University, U.S.A. and Research Institute of Economics and Business Administration, Kobe University, JAPAN)

  • Nobuaki Hamaguchi

    (Research Institute of Economics and Business Administration, Kobe University, JAPAN)

  • Charles Piot

    (Cultural Anthropology and African & African American Studies, Duke University, U.S.A.)

  • Jiahan Yin

    (Department of Economics, Duke University, U.S.A.)

Abstract

This paper attempts to gain greater clarity about an issue which has considerable bearing on economic policy in Africa yet remains poorly diagnosed: the relation between informality and dynamism among low-income micro enterprises. We begin with the premise that micro entrepreneurs are driven by non-pecuniary motives, to varying degree, and adopt informal ways of doing business when informal motivations are strong. Building on this premise, we construct a regression model in which the dynamism of microenterprises is explained by the informality of entrepreneurs' motivations and of his/her ways of doing business as well as interactions among these two informality variables. We apply the model to microentrepreneurs in Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria, with data derived from a survey conducted for this research. The regression results show that the relation between informality and dynamism is intricate. Two of the four informal business practices tested - small business size and limited bookkeeping - negatively affect business growth while the other two have no significant influence either way. On the other hand, informal motivations - represented by a composite index of non-pecuniary motivations - have a positive effect on business growth although the effect is not directly observable. When an enterprise is operated in an informal setting by an entrepreneur with strong informal motivations, the synergy between the setting and the motivation works to increase the chance of business growth. The resilience of microenterprises too is linked positively to informality although interactions between motivation and business practice tend to reduce business growth in this case. Informal motivations and informal business practices are interwoven, an insight that could help in developing policy that could strengthen informal enterprises on the continent.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroyuki Hino & Nobuaki Hamaguchi & Charles Piot & Jiahan Yin, 2024. "Informality and Dynamism of Microbusinesses in Africa: Possible Causalities," Discussion Paper Series DP2024-14, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
  • Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2024-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2024-14.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amaral, Pedro S. & Quintin, Erwan, 2006. "A competitive model of the informal sector," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 1541-1553, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ceyhun Elgin & Ferda Erturk, 2016. "Is Informality a Barrier to Convergence?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2556-2568.
    2. Leyva, Gustavo & Urrutia, Carlos, 2020. "Informality, labor regulation, and the business cycle," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Emmanuel U. Haruna, 2023. "The multidimensional effect of financial development on the shadow economy in Africa: A dynamic panel analysis approach," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 327-365, May.
    4. Julia Passabom Araujo & Mauro Rodrigues, 2015. "Taxation, credit constraints and the informal economy," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2015_43, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    5. Colin C Williams & Abbi M. Kedir, 2016. "Business Registration And Firm Performance: Some Lessons From India," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Nino Kokashvili & Irakli Barbakadze & Ketevani Kapanadze, 2017. "How Participating In The Shadow Economy Affects The Growth Of Latvian Firms," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 101, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    7. Oliver Pardo, 2023. "Mandatory retirement savings in the presence of an informal labor market," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2857-2888, October.
    8. Ligita Gasparėnienė & Rita Remeikienė & Colin C. Williams, 2022. "Unemployment and the Informal Economy," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-96687-4, January.
    9. Daniel Haanwinckel & Rodrigo R Soares, 2021. "Workforce Composition, Productivity, and Labour Regulations in a Compensating Differentials Theory of Informality [Search with Multi-worker Firms]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(6), pages 2970-3010.
    10. Gökçer Özgür & Ceyhun Elgin & Adem Y. Elveren, 2021. "Is informality a barrier to sustainable development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 45-65, January.
    11. Olivier Bargain & Eliane Badaoui & Prudence Kwenda & Eric Strobl & Frank Walsh, 2012. "The formal sector wage premium and firm size for self-employed workers," Working Papers 201207, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    12. Miroslava Kostova Karaboytcheva & Luis Rubio Andrada, 2012. "The Impact of the Shadow Economy on the Country Risk Index," Chapters, in: Michael Pickhardt & Aloys Prinz (ed.), Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Biswajit Mandal & Sugata Marjit & Hamid Beladi, 2018. "Reform, informal sector, and extortion," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 106-123, March.
    14. Sebastian Galiani & Federico Weinschelbaum, 2012. "Modeling Informality Formally: Households And Firms," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 50(3), pages 821-838, July.
    15. Salvatore Capasso & Franziska Ohnsorge & Shu Yu, 2025. "From financial development to informality: a causal link," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 539-572, June.
    16. Paula Herrera-Id�rraga & Enrique L�pez-Bazo & Elisabet Motell�n, 2015. "Double Penalty in Returns to Education: Informality and Educational Mismatch in the Colombian Labour Market," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(12), pages 1683-1701, December.
    17. Sandra V. Rozo V., 2008. "Costos laborales: una aproximación teórica a sus efectos," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, vol. 26(57), pages 72-128.
    18. Quintin, Erwan, 2008. "Limited enforcement and the organization of production," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 1222-1245, September.
    19. Elgin, Ceyhun & Solis-Garcia, Mario, 2015. "Tax enforcement, technology, and the informal sector," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-120.
    20. Mendi, Pedro & Mudida, Robert, 2018. "The effect on innovation of beginning informal: Empirical evidence from Kenya," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 326-335.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2024-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rikobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.