IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kch/wpaper/sdes-2025-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Online productivity and types of assignments in a Japanese workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Kostiantyn Ovsiannikov

    (Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)

  • Koji Kotani

    (Research Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology)

  • Hodaka Morita

Abstract

With the advance of the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies in the world have embraced telework. Despite the large volume of related studies, telework has not been well documented in relation to work formats and assignments. We pose an open question of how productivity in an online or telework environment (i.e., online productivity) depends on work formats (individual vs. group) and types of assignments (routine vs. creative), hypothesizing that online productivity is low as compared to face-to-face productivity for creative tasks in a group format. We conducted the stratified questionnaire survey with 500 Japanese employees, collecting the data of their perceived online productivity for carrying out simple and creative tasks in individual and group formats as compared to face-to-face productivity. The three main findings are obtained. First, online productivity tends to be low for a group format as compared to an individual format. Second, in a group format, online productivity is higher for routine than for creative tasks. Third, online productivity is unconditionally exacerbated in organizations with a seniority-based wage system as compared to those with a performancebased one. Overall, our findings highlight a “telework dilemma†whereby online productivity is perceived to be low as compared to face-to-face one in a group format irrespective of the types of assignments, while a majority of people are willing to continue telework. To resolve it, some new measures or approaches shall be necessary to digitally enhance group operations in an online environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostiantyn Ovsiannikov & Koji Kotani & Hodaka Morita, "undated". "Online productivity and types of assignments in a Japanese workplace," Working Papers SDES-2025-2, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2025-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.souken.kochi-tech.ac.jp/seido/wp/SDES-2025-2.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dingel, Jonathan I. & Neiman, Brent, 2020. "How many jobs can be done at home?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Melanie S. Brucks & Jonathan Levav, 2022. "Publisher Correction: Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 606(7915), pages 17-17, June.
    3. Melanie S. Brucks & Jonathan Levav, 2022. "Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7908), pages 108-112, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lina Bjerke & Steven Bond-Smith & Philip McCann & Charlotta Mellander, 2025. "Work-from-home, relocation, and shadow effects: Evidence from Sweden," Working Papers 2025-1, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    2. Luca, Davide & Özgüzel, Cem & Wei, Zhiwu, 2024. "The spatially uneven diffusion of remote jobs in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122651, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Pablo Zarate & Mathias Dolls & Steven J. Davis & Nicholas Bloom & Jose Maria Barrero & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "Why Does Working from Home Vary Across Countries and People?," NBER Working Papers 32374, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Janice C. dup Eberly & John dup Fernald, 2022. "Jackson Hole 2022 - Reassessing Economic Constraints: Potential Output (The Impact of COVID on Productivity and Potential Output)," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August.
    5. John G. Fernald & Huiyu Li, 2022. "The Impact of COVID on Productivity and Potential Output," Working Paper Series 2022-19, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    6. Burdett, Ashley & Etheridge, Ben & Tang, Li & Wang, Yikai, 2024. "Worker productivity during Covid-19 and adaptation to working from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Steven Bond-Smith & Philip McCann, 2022. "The work-from-home revolution and the performance of cities," Working Papers 2022-6, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    8. Duanyi Yang & Erin L. Kelly & Laura D. Kubzansky & Lisa Berkman, 2023. "Working from Home and Worker Well-being: New Evidence from Germany," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 504-531, May.
    9. John G. Fernald & Huiyu Li, 2023. "Productivity in the World Economy During and After the Pandemic," Working Paper Series 2023-29, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    10. Moritz Goldbeck, 2022. "Bit by Bit - Colocation and the Death of Distance in Software Developer Networks," ifo Working Paper Series 386, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    11. Masayuki Morikawa, 2024. "Productivity dynamics of work from home: Firm-level evidence from Japan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 465-487, April.
    12. Giorgio Gnecco & Sara Landi & Massimo Riccaboni, 2024. "The emergence of social soft skill needs in the post COVID-19 era," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 647-680, February.
    13. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    14. Ronja Kirschning & Matthias Mrożewski, 2024. "Revisiting the knowledge spillover paradox: the impact of infrastructure," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Li Yu & Weiwei Wu, 2024. "The impact of perceived environmental corporate social responsibility on idea generation and idea implementation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Galindo, Arturo & Tovar, Jorge, 2022. "Policy Support and Firm Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Colombia," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12591, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. David Sims & David Nicholas & Carol Tenopir & Suzie Allard & Anthony Watkinson, 2023. "Pandemic Impact on Early Career Researchers in the United States," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    18. José María Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis, 2023. "The Evolution of Work from Home," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 23-50, Fall.
    19. Dachs, Bernhard & Amoroso, Sara & Castellani, Davide & Papanastassiou, Marina & von Zedtwitz, Max, 2024. "The internationalisation of R&D: Past, present and future," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1).
    20. Minet, Alice & Wentzel, Daniel & Raff, Stefan & Garbas, Janina, 2024. "Design thinking in physical and virtual environments: Conceptual foundations, qualitative analysis, and practical implications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2025-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sachiko Minami (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smkocjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.