IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jrs/wpaper/202504.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU economy’s dependency on nature

Author

Listed:

Abstract

While the importance of nature for economic production is undisputed, nature’s contribution is still underrepresented in economic modelling. Following previous studies, this work produces a “high-level” estimate of the dependencies of all EU economic sectors on ecosystem services by applying the ENCORE (Exploring Natural Capital Opportunities, Risks and Exposure) framework to an input-output model. Depending on the version of ENCORE used and on some other assumptions, between 19% and 36% of the EU economy’s gross value added (GVA) is found to be highly dependent on ecosystem services. International extensions of the analysis show that the economies of EU and China appear to be more dependent on nature than that of the United States. The analysis also reveals that the entire economy is vulnerable to nature degradation, as all sectors are interlinked through supply and customer connections, potentially leading to cascading effects along value chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirschbuehl, Dominik & Neuville, Aude & Petracco Giudici, Marco & Sanchez Arjona, Irene, 2025. "The EU economy’s dependency on nature," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2025-04, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    • Handle: RePEc:jrs:wpaper:202504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC140304
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Richard Wood & Konstantin Stadler & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Stephan Lutter & Stefan Giljum & Arjan De Koning & Jeroen Kuenen & Helmut Schütz & José Acosta-Fernández & Arkaitz Usubiaga & Moana Simas & Olg, 2014. "Global Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Konstantin Stadler & Richard Wood & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Carl†Johan Södersten & Moana Simas & Sarah Schmidt & Arkaitz Usubiaga & José Acosta†Fernández & Jeroen Kuenen & Martin Bruckner & Stefan, 2018. "EXIOBASE 3: Developing a Time Series of Detailed Environmentally Extended Multi†Regional Input†Output Tables," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 502-515, June.
    4. Raimund Bleischwitz & Catalina Spataru & Stacy D. VanDeveer & Michael Obersteiner & Ester Voet & Corey Johnson & Philip Andrews-Speed & Tim Boersma & Holger Hoff & Detlef P. Vuuren, 2018. "Resource nexus perspectives towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(12), pages 737-743, December.
    5. Aqib Aslam & Natalija Novta & Mr. Fabiano Rodrigues Rodrigues Bastos, 2017. "Calculating Trade in Value Added," IMF Working Papers 2017/178, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Sun, Zhongxiao & Behrens, Paul & Tukker, Arnold & Bruckner, Martin & Scherer, Laura, 2022. "Shared and environmentally just responsibility for global biodiversity loss," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivanova, Diana & Wieland, Hanspeter, 2023. "Tracing carbon footprints to intermediate industries in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    3. Cahen-Fourot, Louison & Campiglio, Emanuele & Godin, Antoine & Kemp-Benedict, Eric & Trsek, Stefan, 2021. "Capital stranding cascades: The impact of decarbonisation on productive asset utilisation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Abdullaev Elbek Erkin Ugli, 2023. "Global Value Chains’ Participation and Logistics Performance in Post-Soviet Economies," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 81-101.
    5. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    6. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2020. "The methane footprint of nations: Stylized facts from a global panel dataset," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang & Koch, Philipp, 2020. "Freihandel und Wohlstand gehen zusammen," Policy Notes 43, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Chika Aoki‐Suzuki & Sébastien M. R. Dente & Daisuke Tanaka & Chihiro Kayo & Shinsuke Murakami & Chiharu Fujii & Kiyotaka Tahara & Seiji Hashimoto, 2021. "Total environmental impacts of Japanese material production," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1474-1485, December.
    9. Hertwich, Edgar, 2020. "Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995-2012," SocArXiv zb3rh, Center for Open Science.
    10. Philipp Koch & Clemens Fessler, 2020. "A test for Heckscher-Ohlin using value-added exports," Papers 2009.11743, arXiv.org.
    11. Arne Geschke & Julien Ugon & Manfred Lenzen & Keiichiro Kanemoto & Daniel Dean Moran, 2019. "Balancing and reconciling large multi-regional input–output databases using parallel optimisation and high-performance computing," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Brink, Corjan & Drissen, Eric & Vollebergh, Herman & Wilting, Harry, 2020. "Accounting for Environmental Damage by Material Production and Use : A Comparison of Seven Western European Countries," Other publications TiSEM 35e9fc26-3166-4def-b878-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Di Filippo, Gabriele, 2018. "What Place does Luxembourg hold in Global Value Chains?," MPRA Paper 86235, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Meng, Jing & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "An extended overview of natural gas use embodied in world economy and supply chains: Policy implications from a time series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Monsalve, Fabio & Zafrilla, Jorge Enrique & Cadarso, María-Ángeles, 2016. "Where have all the funds gone? Multiregional input-output analysis of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 62-71.
    17. Theine, Hendrik & Humer, Stefan & Moser, Mathias & Schnetzer, Matthias, 2022. "Emissions inequality: Disparities in income, expenditure, and the carbon footprint in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    18. Pothen, Frank, 2017. "A structural decomposition of global Raw Material Consumption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 154-165.
    19. Gerbert Hebbink & Laurien Berkvens & Maurice Bun & Henk van Kerkhoff & Juho Koistinen & Guido Schotten & Ad Stokman, 2018. "The price of transition: an analysis of the economic implications of carbon taxing," DNB Occasional Studies 1608, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    20. Hertwich, Edgar G., 2020. "Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995–2012," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Natural capital; nature degradation;

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jrs:wpaper:202504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Benczur (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.