IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18643.html

Remote Work Intensity and Wages: Evidence from a Representative Canadian Labour Force Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Fang, Tony

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

  • Gahramanov, Emin

    (Department of Economics, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ming, Hui

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agriculture University, Sichuan, China)

  • Tang, Xueli

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

Building on seminal contributions by Bloom et al. (2015) and Davis (2024), we develop a simple theoretical model that captures the trade-off between externalities associated with remote work and those derived from in-office work. The model is based on the premise that both productivity and firm profitability are influenced by the intensity or proportion of remote work arrangements by firms. Ultimately, higher workforce productivity and firm profitability due to remote work translate into higher wages. While remote work can lead to cost savings and positive externalities, excessive adoption may undermine benefits, increase management complexity, and raise the risk of employee shirking. The central theoretical result is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the extent of remote work and wages. To test this prediction, we use data from the Canadian Labour Force Survey to examine the relationship between industry-level remote work intensity and individual wages. The empirical findings reveal that wages rise with remote work intensity up to a threshold, approximately 52.1–63.9%, beyond which they begin to decline, supporting the model's non-linear prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang, Tony & Gahramanov, Emin & Ming, Hui & Tang, Xueli, 2026. "Remote Work Intensity and Wages: Evidence from a Representative Canadian Labour Force Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 18643, IZA Network @ LISER.
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18643.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrero, José María & Bloom, Nicholas & Davis, Steven J. & Meyer, Brent & Mihaylov, Emil, 2022. "The Shift to Remote Work Lessens Wage-Growth Pressures," IZA Discussion Papers 15385, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Victoria Vernon, 2025. "Remote work, wages, and hours worked in the United States," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-49, March.
    3. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    4. Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Victoria Vernon, 2022. "Telework, Wages, and Time Use in the United States," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 687-734, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The Allocation of Time and Remote Work," CESifo Working Paper Series 12363, CESifo.
    2. Benjamin Cowan, 2024. "Time use, college attainment, and the working-from-home revolution," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Goulas, Sofoklis, 2025. "The Value of Remote Work: A Correspondence Experiment on Tutors," IZA Discussion Papers 17592, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Masayuki Morikawa, 2023. "Productivity dynamics of remote work during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 317-331, July.
    5. Tony Fang & Emin Gahramanov & Ming Hui & Xueli Tang, 2026. "Remote work intensity and wages: evidence from a representative canadian labour force survey," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Benjamin W. Cowan & Todd R. Jones, 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12117, CESifo.
    7. Maria Barrero, Jose & Bloom, Nicholas & Davis, Steven J., 2021. "Internet access and its implications for productivity, inequality and resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113869, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Brandon J. Restrepo & Eliana Zeballos, 2022. "Correction to: Work from Home and Daily Time Allocations: Evidence from the Coronavirus Pandemic," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 759-761, September.
    9. Gaetano Basso & Davide Dottori & Sara Formai, 2025. "Working from home and labour productivity: firm-level evidence," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1508, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    10. Brandon J. Restrepo & Eliana Zeballos, 2023. "Working from Home and Emotional Well-Being during Major Daily Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Burdett, Ashley & Etheridge, Ben & Tang, Li & Wang, Yikai, 2024. "Worker productivity during Covid-19 and adaptation to working from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Guillaume Gueguen & Claudia Senik, 2023. "Adopting telework: The causal impact of working from home on subjective well‐being," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 832-868, December.
    13. Andreas Kotsadam & Mette Løvgren & Nicolas Moreau & Elena Stancanelli & Arthur van Soest, 2025. "When Gender Kicks in: an Experimental Study of Work from Home and Attitudes to Household Work and Childcare," PSE Working Papers halshs-05423519, HAL.
    14. Schütz, Bernhard & Reiter, Oliver & Landesmann, Michael & Jovanović, Branimir, 2025. "Structural change, income distribution and unemployment related to Covid-19: An agent-based model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 61-84.
    15. José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal & José Alberto Molina & Jorge Velilla, 2026. "Well-Being, Isolation, and Lockdowns in the UK," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-30, October.
    16. Masayuki Morikawa, 2024. "Productivity dynamics of work from home: Firm-level evidence from Japan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 465-487, April.
    17. Gregor Schubert, 2026. "Organizational Technology Ladders: Remote Work and Generative AI Adoption," Papers 2608.11626, arXiv.org.
    18. Cowan, Benjamin & Jones, Todd R., 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," IZA Discussion Papers 18112, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Victoria Vernon, 2025. "Remote work, wages, and hours worked in the United States," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-49, March.
    20. Arie Kapteyn & Elena Stancanelli, 2025. "A tale of Work from Home in the aftermath of the Great Recession: Learning from high-frequency diaries," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1431-1457, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.