IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/201001010800001136.html

A Return of the Threshing Ring? A Case Study of Machinery and Labor-Sharing in Midwestern Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Artz, Georgeanne M.
  • Colson, Gregory
  • Ginder, Roger

Abstract

Machinery-sharing provides an alternative for smaller producers to obtain the efficiencies of large farming operations and remain competitive in an increasingly concentrated agricultural industry. This research uses a multiple case study design to examine the motivations for sharing equipment and labor among farms and to better understand how group members handle the transaction costs of sharing. Our case evidence finds that in addition to cost savings, access to reliable labor is an important motivation for participating in a sharing arrangement. Trust and frequent communication among group members helps to minimize the transaction costs incurred from sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Artz, Georgeanne M. & Colson, Gregory & Ginder, Roger, 2010. "A Return of the Threshing Ring? A Case Study of Machinery and Labor-Sharing in Midwestern Farms," ISU General Staff Papers 201001010800001136, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201001010800001136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2e24ce61-069d-4561-a6fa-839d9609962d/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feil, J.-H. & Anastassiadis, F. & Mußhoff, O. & Kasten, P., . "Analysing Farmers’ Preferences fo Collaborative Arrangements: An Experimental Approach," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 51.
    2. Simon Cornée & Madeg Le Guernic & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Governing Common-Property Assets: Theory and Evidence from Agriculture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 691-710, November.
    3. Wepner, Beatrix & Neuberger, Sabine & Hörlesberger, Marianne & Molin, Eva Maria & Lampert, Jasmin & Koch, Hanna, 2025. "How can digitalisation support transformation towards sustainable agri-food systems? Scenario development in Lower Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Min‐Han Tsai & Yir‐Hueih Luh, 2023. "Group heterogeneity and the economic effect of farmer organisation participation: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 473-491, June.
    5. Weil, Rachel J. & Silva, Erin M & Hendrickson, John & Mitchell, Paul D., 2017. "Time and Technique Studies for Assessing Labor Productivity on Diversified Organic Vegetable Farms," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 7(4).
    6. Leppälä, Jarkko & Rautiainen, Risto & Kauranen, Ilkka, . "Analysis of risk management tools applicable in managing farm risks: A literature review," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(3).
    7. Artz, Georgeanne & Naeve, Linda, 2016. "The Benefits and Challenges of Machinery Sharing Among Small-scale Fruit and Vegetable Growers," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 6(3).
    8. Yiorgos Gadanakis & Jorge Campos-González & Philip Jones, 2024. "Linking Entrepreneurship to Productivity: Using a Composite Indicator for Farm-Level Innovation in UK Agriculture with Secondary Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201001010800001136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.