IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/359913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time and Technique Studies for Assessing Labor Productivity on Diversified Organic Vegetable Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Weil, Rachel J.
  • Silva, Erin M
  • Hendrickson, John
  • Mitchell, Paul D.

Abstract

As regional food purchasing continues to gain consumer interest, an increasing number of diver­sified vegetable farms have emerged to meet market demand. Many of the small- and midscale vegetable farms selling into local markets, however, face continued challenges concerning the financial decision-making and the viability of their opera­tions. Greater understanding of the consequences of financial, labor, and production-management decisions has the potential to improve the long-term success of these farms. In this exploratory work utilizing a comparative case study approach involving 10 diversified vegetable farms, we con­ducted time and technique studies to assess labor productivity as related to different farm labor and production management decisions. We focused our analysis on three specific activities (transplanting, harvest, and postharvest handling) for five com­mon crops (broccoli, carrots, lettuce, peppers, and squash). Our results showed tremendous farm-to-farm variation in labor productivity, reflecting the diversity of approaches to production and management. Both mechanization and farm size influenced the time required to complete produc­tion and postharvest activities; however, these relationships were not consistent across all crops and activities. While time and technique studies can help farmers to more effectively strategize innova­tions in production practices and equipment pur­chases, farm-specific considerations such as crew size, farm land base, and worker welfare will remain important factors for farmers in assessing the consequences of mechanizing any process and of changing their particular management strategy, as well as the appropriateness of adopting technol­ogies in the context of farm scale and resources. Challenges and weaknesses associated with on-farm participatory time and technique studies were identified, leading to recommendations to create a more feasible system for similar data-collection efforts. The data generated by further expansion on our approach can provide diversified vegetable farmers, food system development professionals, and policy-makers with an additional information to contribute to the successful growth and financial status of diversified vegetable farms serving as vital components of strong local and regional food systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Weil, Rachel J. & Silva, Erin M & Hendrickson, John & Mitchell, Paul D., 2017. "Time and Technique Studies for Assessing Labor Productivity on Diversified Organic Vegetable Farms," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 7(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/359913/files/pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Artz, Georgeanne & Colson, Gregory & Ginder, Roger, 2010. "A Return of the Threshing Ring? A Case Study of Machinery and Labor-Sharing in Midwestern Farms," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 805-819, November.
    2. Artz, Georgeanne M. & Colson, Gregory & Ginder, Roger G., 2010. "A Return of the Threshing Ring? A Case Study of Machinery and Labor-Sharing in Midwestern Farms," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wepner, Beatrix & Neuberger, Sabine & Hörlesberger, Marianne & Molin, Eva Maria & Lampert, Jasmin & Koch, Hanna, 2025. "How can digitalisation support transformation towards sustainable agri-food systems? Scenario development in Lower Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Artz, Georgeanne & Naeve, Linda, 2016. "The Benefits and Challenges of Machinery Sharing Among Small-scale Fruit and Vegetable Growers," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 6(3).
    3. Simon Cornée & Madeg Le Guernic & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Governing Common-Property Assets: Theory and Evidence from Agriculture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 691-710, November.
    4. Feil, J.-H. & Anastassiadis, F. & Mußhoff, O. & Kasten, P., . "Analysing Farmers’ Preferences fo Collaborative Arrangements: An Experimental Approach," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 51.
    5. Leppälä, Jarkko & Rautiainen, Risto & Kauranen, Ilkka, . "Analysis of risk management tools applicable in managing farm risks: A literature review," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(3).
    6. Yiorgos Gadanakis & Jorge Campos-González & Philip Jones, 2024. "Linking Entrepreneurship to Productivity: Using a Composite Indicator for Farm-Level Innovation in UK Agriculture with Secondary Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Min‐Han Tsai & Yir‐Hueih Luh, 2023. "Group heterogeneity and the economic effect of farmer organisation participation: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 473-491, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:359913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.