IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genres/10537.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Analysis of Joint Decisions on Food Stamp Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Labor Force Participation (An)

Author

Listed:
  • Huffman, Sonya K.
  • Jensen, Helen H.

Abstract

The fundamental motivation for this study is the need to better understand the interaction among the Food Stamp Program (FSP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program and labor force participation under different program design and economic conditions. We use data from the first Survey of Program Dynamics (SPD) longitudinal and the 1998 SPD experimental files. The modeling component consists of estimating equations to predict the probability of particular choices made by households. The households choose the alternative that yields the highest utility. The results show that the TANF program parameters (benefit levels, payments standard, benefit reduction rate, income disregard and citizenship status) do matter. The higher are the benefits, the higher is TANF and FSP participation. TANF participation is positively related to the earned income disregard, and negatively related to the benefit reduction rate; the effects are highly significant. Work, TANF, and FSP participation are significantly related. The results imply that TANF and FSP participation among poor households who are potentially eligible for TANF are sensitive to changes in program parameters and macroeconomic conditions; although labor participation is affected by change in program parameters to some degree, it is most affected (negatively) by the unemployment rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Huffman, Sonya K. & Jensen, Helen H., 2002. "Empirical Analysis of Joint Decisions on Food Stamp Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Labor Force Participation (An)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10537, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genres:10537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genres:10537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Curtis Balmer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.