IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc66028.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Techno-economic analysis of key renewable energy technologies (PV, CSP and wind)

Author

Abstract

This report shows the results of a techno-economic analysis of key renewable energy technologies: Solar Photovoltaics (PV), Concentrating Solar Power (CSP), and Wind Energy Technologies (wind). For this purpose, bottom-up company-data were collected, market supply and demand factors addressed, the regulatory framework examined, and EU industry compared against its main competitors. Personal interviews with 10 key industrialists from these sectors were undertaken to generate first-hand feedback from companies. The information generated was validated in a workshop with selected study participants, industrialists and policymakers. The three technologies hold potential for tackling major energy issues and creating jobs and economic growth, but electricity production costs associated with them are still higher than for conventional technologies. Appropriate regulatory and framework conditions are a prerequisite for introducing PV, CSP and wind into the market and to become competitive. The time horizon for this to happen depends on whether these industries can reduce costs and how conventional energy prices evolve. The 2009 EU Renewable Energy Directive has set targets for increasing the average share of renewable energies in final energy consumption, and PV, CSP and wind will play a key-role in achieving these targets. Their application will however create multiple challenges for the existing electricity grid in terms of integrating the new capacities, energy storage and distribution. Although these challenges have been recognised and gained political momentum at the EU level, the degree to which they will be resolved within the coming decades depends on how quickly they are implemented in the Member States and the interplay of all new super- and smart-grid components. Competition is an important driving factor for improving the three technologies cost-effectiveness as they also have to compete with other energy technologies and against the various technology options throughout the whole supply chain. An important question here is to which degree externalities are included in the cost calculation. If externalities in conventional energy generation are taken into account, some renewable technologies (wind) already have a competitive edge. The CSP sector is the less mature industry, not yet at the stage of mass manufacturing. In terms of R&D investment, the study shows that the EU companies lead in CSP and wind energy and the non-EU companies (USA and Asia) lead in PV. However, these results, based on 2008 figures, need careful interpretation since recent patterns of investment in renewable energy show significant changes. This is due to the effects of the economic crisis and to different investment reactions by emerging and developed economies. By spring 2011, there is evidence of stronger R&D activity in some non-EU countries, namely in China, South Korea, India, Japan and the US. Also a number of companies with significant R&D investment were not included in the study either because they had only recently been created or because they did not disclose specific R&D investments in renewable energy. A conclusion on this matter is that the EU does not currently seem to under-invest in these technologies but recent trends indicate a likely challenge on this over the medium term. So as to stimulate R&D for PV, CSP and wind energy, policy should check if there is a balance between policy support for technological development and policy instruments promoting market penetration. Regarding the specific support and Feed-In Tariff (FIT) schemes implemented in the EU, it is necessary to understand their actual impacts, i.e. which part of the value chain obtains the most benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Tuebke & Hector Hernandez Guevara, 2011. "Techno-economic analysis of key renewable energy technologies (PV, CSP and wind)," JRC Research Reports JRC66028, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc66028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC66028
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Wiesenthal & Guillaume Leduc & Hans-Gunther Schwarz & Karel Haegeman, 2009. "RandD Investment in the Priority Technologies of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan," JRC Research Reports JRC52225, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leary, J. & Czyrnek-Delêtre, M. & Alsop, A. & Eales, A. & Marandin, L. & Org, M. & Craig, M. & Ortiz, W. & Casillas, C. & Persson, J. & Dienst, C. & Brown, E. & While, A. & Cloke, J. & Latoufis, K., 2020. "Finding the niche: A review of market assessment methodologies for rural electrification with small scale wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristoffer Palage & Robert Lundmark & Patrik Söderholm, 2019. "The innovation effects of renewable energy policies and their interaction: the case of solar photovoltaics," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(2), pages 217-254, April.
    2. Tobias Wiesnethal & Arnaud Mercier & Burkhard Schade & H. Petric & Lazlo Szabo, 2010. "Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan on the European Power Sector," JRC Research Reports JRC61065, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    3. Ales Gnamus, 2011. "Capacities Map 2011 - Update on the R&D Investments in Three Selected Priority Technologies of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan: Wind, PV and CSP," JRC Research Reports JRC67437, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    4. Wiesenthal, Tobias & Leduc, Guillaume & Haegeman, Karel & Schwarz, Hans-Günther, 2012. "Bottom-up estimation of industrial and public R&D investment by technology in support of policy-making: The case of selected low-carbon energy technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 116-131.
    5. Garry Gabison & Annarosa Pesole, 2014. "An Overview of Models of Distributed Innovation. Open Innovation, User Innovation, and Social Innovation," JRC Research Reports JRC93533, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    6. Wiesenthal, Tobias & Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Leduc, Guillaume, 2015. "Innovation in the European transport sector: A review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 86-93.
    7. Karakosta, Charikleia & Pappas, Charalampos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Psarras, John, 2013. "Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 187-197.
    8. Raphael Calel, 2020. "Adopt or Innovate: Understanding Technological Responses to Cap-and-Trade," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 170-201, August.
    9. Hervás Soriano, Fernando & Mulatero, Fulvio, 2011. "EU Research and Innovation (R&I) in renewable energies: The role of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3582-3590, June.
    10. Karel Haegeman & Mark Boden & Totti Konnola, 2012. "Challenges in transnational research programming: the role of NETWATCH," JRC Research Reports JRC71938, Joint Research Centre (Seville site), revised Aug 2012.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    renewable energy; analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc66028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.