IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc145973.html

Farm succession and land access dynamics

Author

Listed:

Abstract

European agriculture is facing a continued decline in the number of farms and young farmers, with limited access to land identified as a major barrier to generational renewal. These trends have intensified policy concerns, prompting the European Commission to release the strategy for generational renewal, which outlines initiatives to improve land access, including land market assessments and the creation of a European land observatory. This report aims to support these efforts by offering a new perspective on land access dynamics across different phases of the farm succession process. Using a comparative analysis of Belgian (Walloon Region), Irish and Polish Farm Accountancy Data Network data covering 2009–2023, it examines several dimensions of land access, including land utilisation, ownership and rental, considering both the retiring farmer (before transfer) and the new farmer (after transfer). The analysis is structured around a life-cycle framework of farm succession, exploring three mechanisms: the retirement effect, whereby farmers without successors gradually reduce farm activity; the succession effect, where the expectation of farm continuation encourages investment and structural adjustments before transfer; and the successor effect, which captures changes introduced by the new farmer after installation. The report shows that land access dynamics vary across the farm manager’s lifetime, implying distinct needs and challenges at different stages. Identifying a successor prior to farm transfer tends to trigger land expansion and prevents decline. After installation, the new farmer experiences an initial phase of land expansion, which may not occur immediately, probably due to financial constraints. New (non-inherited) farms begin with limited land resources and tend to expand much later than other farms, which significantly restricts their development potential. In some cases, land expansion behaviour, both before and after succession, is more pronounced on larger farms. In addition, new female farmers appear to face greater barriers to land expansion after first installation than new male farmers do. Significant differences between countries in land access dynamics highlight the need for regionally or nationally tailored policies. Because land access varies across phases of the farm manager’s life, policies must target the appropriate phase. New farmers, and particularly new female farmers, may require specific support during the first years after installation, as they face stronger financial constraints and often pay higher land prices, especially in non-inherited farms. In this context, land access and capital access policies could benefit from synergetic design and implementation. Supporting identified successors (and their incumbents) prior to succession could also be considered, as identified successors already exhibit substantial land expansion behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertolozzi Caredio Daniele & Dillon Emma & Ciaian Pavel, 2026. "Farm succession and land access dynamics," JRC Research Reports JRC145973, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc145973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC145973
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liesbet Vranken & Ewa Tabeau & Peter Roebeling & Pavel Ciaian, 2021. "Agricultural land market regulations in the EU Member States," JRC Research Reports JRC126310, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    3. Lobley, Matt & Butler, Allan, 2010. "The impact of CAP reform on farmers' plans for the future: Some evidence from South West England," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 341-348, August.
    4. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio, 2024. "The farm succession effect on farmers’ management choices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Swinnen, Johan F. M., 2002. "Political reforms, rural crises, and land tenure in western Europe," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-394, August.
    6. Dudek, Michał & Pawłowska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Bórawski, Piotr & Bełdycka-Bórawska, Aneta & Szymańska, Elżbieta Jadwiga & Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dunn, James W., 2019. "Price volatility of agricultural land in Poland in the context of the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 486-496.
    8. Silke Hüttel & Matthias Ritter & Viacheslav Esaulov & Martin Odening, 2016. "Is there a term structure in land lease rates?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 165-187.
    9. Baldoni, Edoardo & Ciaian, Pavel, 2023. "The capitalization of CAP subsidies into land prices in the EU," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Uchiyama, Tomohiro & Lobley, Matt & Errington, Andrew & Yanagimura, Shunsuke, 2008. "Dimensions of Intergenerational Farm Business Transfers in Canada, England, the USA and Japan," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 10, pages 1-16.
    11. Sheridan, Alison & Newsome, Lucie & Howard, Tanya & Lawson, Andrew & Saunders, Skye, 2021. "Intergenerational farm succession: How does gender fit?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Läpple, Doris & Rensburg, Tom Van, 2011. "Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1406-1414, May.
    13. Viviana Garcia & Chloe McCallum & Robert Finger, 2024. "Heterogeneity of European farmers’ risk preferences: an individual participant data meta-analysis," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(3), pages 725-778.
    14. Sandra Contzen & Jérémie Forney, 2017. "Family farming and gendered division of labour on the move: a typology of farming-family configurations," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 27-40, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bojnec, Stefan, 2011. "Land Markets in the Three Candidate Countries of the EU," Working papers 117482, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Russo, Silvia & Raggi, Meri & Bimbati, Barbara & Povellato, Andrea & Viaggi, Davide, 2025. "Farm characteristics and exogenous factors influencing the choice to buy land in Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(1).
    3. Johan Swinnen, & Kristine Van Herck & Liesbet Vranken, 2014. "The Diversity of Land Institutions in Europe," LICOS Discussion Papers 35514, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    4. Cord-Friedrich von Hobe & Marius Michels & Oliver Musshoff, 2021. "German Farmers’ Perspectives on Price Drivers in Agricultural Land Rental Markets—A Combination of a Systematic Literature Review and Survey Results," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Pavel Ciaian & Dusan Drabik & Jan Falkowski & d'Artis Kancs, 2016. "Market Impacts of New Land Market Regulations in Eastern EU Member States," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2016/02, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    6. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio, 2024. "The farm succession effect on farmers’ management choices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Laure Latruffe & Nolwenn Blache & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux, 2025. "Understanding the diversity and the personal experience of successors during farm transfers: case study in French cattle farming," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 293-325, October.
    8. Baldoni, Edoardo & Ciaian, Pavel, 2023. "The capitalization of CAP subsidies into land prices in the EU," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Liesbet Vranken & Ewa Tabeau & Peter Roebeling & Pavel Ciaian, 2021. "Agricultural land market regulations in the EU Member States," JRC Research Reports JRC126310, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Deininger, Klaus W. & Ali, Daniel Ayalew, 2026. "Testing for Market Power in Agricultural Land Markets : Evidence from Ukraine," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11355, The World Bank.
    11. Pavel Ciaian & Edoardo Baldoni & d'Artis Kancs & Dušan Drabik, 2021. "The Capitalization of Agricultural Subsidies into Land Prices," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 17-38, October.
    12. Deininger, Klaus & Ali, Daniel A., 2025. "Land Price Effects of Informality, Farm Size, and Land Reform: Evidence from More Than One Million Transactions in Ukraine," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361025, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Adewale Henry Adenuga & Claire Jack & Ronan McCarry, 2021. "The Case for Long-Term Land Leasing: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    15. Cuong Le Van & Nguyen To The, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of organic production," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 33-59, February.
    16. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2009. "Agricultural Protection Growth in Europe, 1870-1969," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 50296, World Bank.
    17. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia & Loughrey, Jason, 2023. "The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Michael J. Motta, 2021. "Diffusion and Typology: The Invention and Early Adoption of Medicinal Marijuana and Offshore Wind Policies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 567-584, January.
    19. Rezbova, Helena & Tomsík, Karel, . "Impact of Complementary National Direct Payments on Cattle Breeding Sector," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4 Special), pages 1-11.
    20. Eligio Malusà & Ewa M. Furmanczyk & Małgorzata Tartanus & Gerjan Brouwer & Claude-Eric Parveaud & François Warlop & Markus Kelderer & Jutta Kienzle & Evelyne Alcazar Marin & Teun Dekker & Radek Vávra , 2022. "Knowledge Networks in Organic Fruit Production across Europe: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc145973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.