IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/inn/wpaper/2015-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Detecting Treatment-Subgroup Interactions in Clustered Data with Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model Trees

Author

Listed:
  • Marjolein Fokkema
  • Niels Smits
  • Achim Zeileis
  • Torsten Hothorn
  • Henk Kelderman

Abstract

Identification of subgroups of patients for which treatment A is more effective than treatment B, and vice versa, is of key importance to the development of personalized medicine. Several tree-based algorithms have been developed for the detection of such treatment-subgroup interactions. In many instances, however, datasets may have a clustered structure, where observations are clustered within, for example, research centers, studies or persons. In the current paper we propose a new algorithm, generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) trees, that allows for detection of treatment-subgroup interactions, as well as estimation of cluster-specific random effects. The algorithm uses model-based recursive partitioning (MOB) to detect treatment-subgroup interactions, and a GLMM for the estimation of random-effects parameters. In a simulation study, we evaluate the performance of GLMM tree and compare it with that of MOB without random-effects estimation. GLMM tree was found to have a much lower Type I error rate than MOB trees without random effects (4% and 33%, respectively). Furthermore, in datasets with treatment-subgroup interactions, GLMM tree recovered the true treatment subgroups much more often than MOB without random effects (in 90% and 61% of the datasets, respectively). Also, GLMM tree predicted treatment outcome differences more accurately than MOB without random effects (average predictive accuracy of .94 and .88, respectively). We illustrate the application of GLMM tree on a patient-level dataset of a meta-analysis on the effects of psycho- and pharmacotherapy for depression. We conclude that GLMM tree is a promising algorithm for the detection of treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjolein Fokkema & Niels Smits & Achim Zeileis & Torsten Hothorn & Henk Kelderman, 2015. "Detecting Treatment-Subgroup Interactions in Clustered Data with Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model Trees," Working Papers 2015-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
  • Handle: RePEc:inn:wpaper:2015-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.uibk.ac.at/downloads/c4041030/wpaper/2015-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Achim Zeileis, 2005. "A Unified Approach to Structural Change Tests Based on ML Scores, F Statistics, and OLS Residuals," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 445-466.
    2. L. Doove & E. Dusseldorp & K. Deun & I. Mechelen, 2014. "A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment–subgroup interactions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(4), pages 403-425, December.
    3. Elise Dusseldorp & Jacqueline Meulman, 2004. "The regression trunk approach to discover treatment covariate interaction," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 355-374, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberta Siciliano & Antonio D’Ambrosio & Massimo Aria & Sonia Amodio, 2017. "Analysis of Web Visit Histories, Part II: Predicting Navigation by Nested STUMP Regression Trees," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(3), pages 473-493, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2018. "Tree-structured modelling of categorical predictors in generalized additive regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 737-758, September.
    2. Moritz Berger & Thomas Welchowski & Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg & Matthias Schmid, 2019. "A classification tree approach for the modeling of competing risks in discrete time," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(4), pages 965-990, December.
    3. KUROZUMI, Eiji & 黒住, 英司, 2016. "Monitoring Parameter Constancy with Endogenous Regressors," Discussion Papers 2016-01, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Susan Athey & Julie Tibshirani & Stefan Wager, 2016. "Generalized Random Forests," Papers 1610.01271, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    5. Colin O’hare & Youwei Li, 2017. "Modelling mortality: are we heading in the right direction?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 170-187, January.
    6. Ross Sparks & Tim Keighley & David Muscatello, 2010. "Early warning CUSUM plans for surveillance of negative binomial daily disease counts," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11), pages 1911-1929.
    7. Fantazzini, Dean & Shangina, Tamara, 2019. "The importance of being informed: forecasting market risk measures for the Russian RTS index future using online data and implied volatility over two decades," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 55, pages 5-31.
    8. Jamel Jouini, 2010. "Bootstrap methods for single structural change tests: power versus corrected size and empirical illustration," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 85-109, January.
    9. Kleiber, Christian, 2016. "Structural Change in (Economic) Time Series," Working papers 2016/06, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    10. Piotr Kotlarz & Michael Hanke & Sebastian Stöckl, 2023. "Regime-dependent drivers of the EUR/CHF exchange rate," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 159(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Makram El-Shagi & Sebastian Giesen, 2013. "Testing for Structural Breaks at Unknown Time: A Steeplechase," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 41(1), pages 101-123, January.
    12. Wang, Lu & Chang, Hsu-Ling & Sari, Arif & Sowah, James Karmoh & Cai, Xu-Yu, 2020. "Resources or development first: An interesting question for a developing country," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Davinson Stev Abril Salcedo & Luis Fernando Melo Velandia & Daniel Parra Amado, 2015. "Heterogeneidad de los Índices de Producción Sectoriales de la Industria Colombiana," Borradores de Economia 888, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    14. Jan J. J. Groen & George Kapetanios & Simon Price, 2013. "Multivariate Methods For Monitoring Structural Change," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 250-274, March.
    15. Thomas Windberger & Achim Zeileis, 2011. "Structural Breaks in Inflation Dynamics within the European Monetary Union," Working Papers 2011-12, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    16. Achim Zeileis & Torsten Hothorn, 2013. "A toolbox of permutation tests for structural change," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 931-954, November.
    17. Šárka Hudecová & Marie Hušková & Simos G. Meintanis, 2017. "Tests for Structural Changes in Time Series of Counts," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 843-865, December.
    18. L. Doove & E. Dusseldorp & K. Deun & I. Mechelen, 2014. "A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment–subgroup interactions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(4), pages 403-425, December.
    19. Martin Wagner & Achim Zeileis, 2019. "Heterogeneity and Spatial Dependence of Regional Growth in the EU: A Recursive Partitioning Approach," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 20(1), pages 67-82, February.
    20. O'Hare, Colin & Li, Youwei, 2014. "Identifying structural breaks in stochastic mortality models," MPRA Paper 62994, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    model-based recursive partitioning; treatment-subgroup interactions; random effects; generalized linear mixed-effects model; classification and regression trees;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C87 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Econometric Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inn:wpaper:2015-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Janette Walde (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fuibkat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.