IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/14717.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative analysis of sustainability related disclosure frameworks: SFDR, IFC PS, and BRSR

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Garg
  • Kruti Upadhyay
  • Sanjay Kumar Jain

Abstract

This study is an attempt to compare and contrast the existing sustainability-related frameworks – Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR) introduced by the European Union, Business responsibility and sustainability reporting (BRSR) introduced by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the International Finance Corporation Performance Standards (IFC PS) developed by the International Finance Corporation. The content analysis method has been employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the indicators included in these frameworks. Our key findings suggest that SFDR is the most comprehensive of the three frameworks considered. The BRSR framework stops at the disclosures related to the business itself. However, the IFC PS is the most adaptable as compared to the other two frameworks considered for this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Garg & Kruti Upadhyay & Sanjay Kumar Jain, 2024. "Comparative analysis of sustainability related disclosure frameworks: SFDR, IFC PS, and BRSR," IIMA Working Papers WP 2024-10-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/2024-10/WP-2024-10-01_0.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Singhania & Neha Saini, 2023. "Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: comparative analysis of developed and developing countries," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 516-559, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Alonso-Robisco & Jose Carbo & Emily Kormanyos & Elena Triebskorn, 2025. "Houston, we have a problem: can satellite information bridge the climate-related data gap?," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Addressing climate change data needs: the central banks' contribution, volume 63, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Zhi Chen & Jinfeng Yang & Peigong Li & Stavros Sindakis, 2024. "Navigating the Knowledge Economy: Unraveling the Impact of Executive Policy Cognition on ESG Performance in China’s A-Share Listed Companies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 15788-15832, December.
    3. Chengjie Huang & Hang Zhou & Wan Ahmad Norhayati & Ram Al Jaffri Saad & Xinrui Zhang, 2024. "Tax incentives, common institutional ownership, and corporate ESG performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 2516-2528, June.
    4. Donghui Zhao & Sue Lin Ngan & Ainul Huda Jamil & Mohd Fairuz Md Salleh & Wan Sallha Yusoff, 2025. "Peer Effects on ESG Disclosure: Drivers and Implications for Sustainable Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Liao, Qinghu & Erzurumlu, Yaman Omer & Gozgor, Giray, 2025. "Impact of market regulations on firm-specific esg performance: evidence from asian economies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Jiang, Liqun & Chang, Zhongyuan & Yao, Wenxin & Huang, Leyi & Zhou, Shumei, 2024. "Transcend local for global: ESG as a legitimacy signal in the global expansion of emerging multinational enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    7. Adeyemi Adebayo & Barry Ackers, 2024. "Managing Trade‐Offs Between Environmental, Social, Governance and Financial Sustainability in State‐Owned Enterprises: Insights from an Emerging Market," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(1), pages 55-73, March.
    8. Zakia Abdelmoneim & Mohamed Samy El-Deeb, 2024. "BOD characteristics and their impact on the link between ESG disclosure and integrated reporting disclosure quality: a study of Egyptian non-financial firms," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Kaouther Chebbi, 2024. "Examining the interplay of sustainable development, corporate governance, and stock Price crash risk: Insights from ESG practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1291-1309, February.
    10. Barry Ackers & Adeyemi Adebayo, 2024. "The nexus between non‐governmental organisations involved in conservation and profit‐seeking state‐owned enterprises: A potential alternative credibility enhancing mechanism for biodiversity disclosur," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2699-2714, July.
    11. Tiyas Kurnia Sari & Mahfud Sholihin & Singgih Wijayana, 2024. "The influence of coercive pressures on reporting on SDGs during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An international study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7140-7155, December.
    12. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl, 2025. "A novel AI-driven approach to greenwashing: breakthroughs in the future fit between domain-specific Islamic enterprises with varying developmental progress and ESG landscapes," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, December.
    13. Kasırga Yıldırak & Ömer Kayhan Seyhun, 2025. "Refining ESG models: embedding natural capital valuation beyond box-ticking compliance towards confronting planetary boundaries," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Addressing climate change data needs: the central banks' contribution, volume 63, Bank for International Settlements.
    14. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting during the Crisis—What Was Disclosed by Companies in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-54, August.
    15. Hok-Ko Pong & Chun-Cheong Fong, 2024. "Environmental, Social and Governance Awareness and Organisational Risk Perception Amongst Accountants," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-31, October.
    16. Kesen Zhang & Bilal Ahmed & Ruping Wang & Baoying Gu, 2025. "The Influence of Internal Governance and External Legitimacy on Greenwashing: A Digitalization Perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4881-4909, February.
    17. Ampedu Raphael & Antwi Agyei Bright & Mang'ati Frank Peter & Boadi Joana Ankobea & Boakye Boateng Gifty & Nunoo Linda Ofeibea & Mensah Cornelius Nii Odoi & Mensah Richmond, 2024. "An Empirical Study on the Influence of ESG Ratings on Earnings Management among Listed Companies in China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3678-3693, August.
    18. Olakunle Oloruntobi & Adel Gohari & Safizahanin Mokhtar & Kasypi Mokhtar & Siti Marsila Mhd. Ruslan, 2025. "Comparative analysis of long-term returns, financial considerations, and measurement challenges in future ESG investing," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 271-297, May.
    19. Zhongjuan Sun & Jialin Feng & Yikai Yuan & Jiamu Sun, 2025. "How does parent firms' ESG disclosure affect overseas subsidiary financial performance? The case of Chinese multinationals," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 128-165, February.
    20. Assaf, Ata & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Palazzi, Rafael Baptista & Demir, Ender, 2025. "Connectedness across environmental, social, and governance (ESG) indices: evidence from emerging markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.