IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ico/wpaper/164.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Political Economy of Knowledge Production in Capitalist Academia: Challenges and Opportunities for Socio-Ecological Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Carina Altreiter

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Theresa Hager

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
    Socio-Ecological Transformation Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

  • Stephan Puehringer

    (Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
    Socio-Ecological Transformation Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Western societies face unprecedented interconnected crises—climate change, democratic instability, rising inequality, and growing science scepticism—that demand fundamental socio-ecological transformation within a compressed timeframe. However, current university systems, shaped by neoliberal restructuring and historically patriarchal logics, are structurally inadequate to support the critical research and societal engagement necessary for this transformation. This diminishes academia's relevance, exacerbating the post-truth crisis. We examine how competitive evaluation mechanisms, economic incentives and academic culture in contemporary academia hinder research conducive to socio-ecological transformations while perpetuating existing power structures and knowledge hierarchies. Through critical analysis of academic structures and knowledge production systems, drawing on existing literature across relevant fields, we build upon the concept of academic capitalism but extend it. We identify four interconnected pillars of what we term "capitalist academia": commodification of knowledge, publish-or-perish logic and competitization, social homogenization, and entrenched hierarchies. These structural features lead to a prioritization of individual competition over collaborative problem-solving, favor incremental research over transformative inquiry, and systematically exclude diverse perspectives essential for addressing complex socio-ecological challenges. Our analysis reveals how these structures of knowledge production not only fail to contribute meaningfully to societal transformation but actively contribute to reproducing the very systems that perpetuate ecological and social crises. We propose replacing these problematic pillars with four alternative principles—the "4Ds": Dialogue, Decommodification, Diversification, and Democratisation. This framework represents a pathway toward emancipatory academia that can meaningfully engage with socio-ecological transformation challenges while preserving scientific integrity. We also provide examples of existing initiatives and ideas where principles of the 4Ds are already in place, demonstrating practical pathways for reform and critically reflect on the adaptability of the current system of knowledge production. This research contributes to ongoing debates about academic reform while offering concrete directions for aligning higher education with sustainability imperatives and building the consensus needed for emancipatory socio-ecological transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Carina Altreiter & Theresa Hager & Stephan Puehringer, 2025. "Political Economy of Knowledge Production in Capitalist Academia: Challenges and Opportunities for Socio-Ecological Transformation," ICAE Working Papers 164, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jku.at/fileadmin/gruppen/108/ICAE_Working_Papers/wp164.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Shrivastava & Louise Jackson & Thaura Ghneim-Herrera & Patrick Caron & Carlos Correa & Carlos Alvarez Pereira & Timothy Coombs & Oluchi Ezekannagha & Nick Ishmael-Perkins & Melissa Leach & Selim , 2024. "Science in crisis times: The crucial role of science in sustainability and transformation," Post-Print hal-05182682, HAL.
    2. Alice H. Wu, 2018. "Gendered Language on the Economics Job Market Rumors Forum," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 175-179, May.
    3. Anna Stansbury & Robert Schultz, 2023. "The Economics Profession's Socioeconomic Diversity Problem," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 207-230, Fall.
    4. Melanie Wiener & Daniela Maresch & Robert J. Breitenecker, 2020. "The shift towards entrepreneurial universities and the relevance of third-party funding of business and economics units in Austria: a research note," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 345-363, April.
    5. Alexandra Witze, 2018. "Sexual harassment is rife in the sciences, finds landmark US study," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7710), pages 352-353, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deepa Dhume Datta & Robert J. Vigfusson, 2024. "Measuring Inclusion: Gender and Coauthorship at the Federal Reserve Board," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2024-091, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Nicolás Ajzenman & Bruno Ferman & Pedro C. Sant'Anna, 2025. "Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks: A Field Experiment on #EconTwitter," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 357-375, September.
    3. Pauline Charousset & Marion Monnet, 2022. "Gendered Teacher Feedback, Students' Math Performance and Enrollment Outcomes: A Text Mining Approach," PSE Working Papers halshs-03733956, HAL.
    4. Marlene Kim, 2023. "The Problem of Gender in Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 639-650, December.
    5. Markus Eberhardt & Giovanni Facchini & Valeria Rueda, 2023. "Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(655), pages 2676-2708.
    6. David Card & Stefano DellaVigna & Patricia Funk & Nagore Iriberri, 2022. "Gender Differences in Peer Recognition by Economists," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(5), pages 1937-1971, September.
    7. von Essen, Emma & Jansson, Joakim, 2020. "Misogynistic and Xenophobic Hate Language Online: A Matter of Anonymity," Working Paper Series 1350, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    8. Abramitzky, Ran & Greska, Lena & Pérez, Santiago & Price, Joseph & Schwarz, Carlo & Waldinger, Fabian, 2024. "Climbing the Ivory Tower: How Socio-Economic Background Shapes Academia," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 739, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    9. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Juan F. Martínez-Pérez, 0. "Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    10. Singhal, Karan & Sierminska, Eva, 2024. "Inequality in the Economics Profession," IZA Discussion Papers 17584, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Kong, Nancy & Dulleck, Uwe & Jaffe, Adam B. & Sun, Shupeng & Vajjala, Sowmya, 2023. "Linguistic metrics for patent disclosure: Evidence from university versus corporate patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    12. Wiborg, Vegard Sjurseike & Brekke, Kjell Arne & Nyborg, Karine, 2019. "Collaboration, Alphabetical Order and Gender Discrimination. Evidence from the Lab," Memorandum 4/2019, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    13. Nicol√°s Urdaneta Andrade, 2021. "¬øHombres "cracks" y mujeres "amables"? Sesgos de g√©nero en encuestas de profesores," Documentos CEDE 19557, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    14. Jihui Chen & Qihong Liu & Myongjin Kim, 2022. "Gender gap in tenure and promotion: Evidence from the economics Ph.D. class of 2008," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(4), pages 1277-1312, April.
    15. Gamage, Danula K. & Sevilla, Almudena & Smith, Sarah, 2020. "Women in Economics: A UK Perspective," IZA Discussion Papers 13477, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Lea-Rachel Kosnik, 2023. "Additional evidence on gender and language in academic economics research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 5949-5968, November.
    17. Kristin F. Butcher & Patrick J. McEwan & Akila Weerapana, 2024. "Women’s Colleges and Economics Major Choice: Evidence from Wellesley College Applicants," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 123-161, April.
    18. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Friebel, Guido & Weinberger, Alisa & ,, 2021. "Women in Economics: Europe and the World," CEPR Discussion Papers 16686, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Nick Huntington-Klein & Claus Pörtner & Yubraj Acharya & Matus Adamkovic & Joop Adema & Lameck Ondieki Agasa & Imtiaz Ahmad & Mevlude Akbulut-Yuksel & Martin Eckhoff Andresen & David Angenendt & José-, 2025. "The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics," Working Papers hal-05187084, HAL.
    20. Elizabeth A. Moorhouse, 2022. "Book Review: Women in Economics, by Lundberg, S. (Ed.)," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 67(1), pages 147-152, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ico:wpaper:164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teresa Griesebner The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Teresa Griesebner to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igjkuat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.