IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Choice of Product Architecture, Product Quality, and Intra-Firm Coordination: Theory and Evidence Choice of Product Architecture, Product Quality, and Intra-Firm Coordination: Theory and Evidence

Listed author(s):
  • Morita, Hodaka
  • Nakajima, Kentaro
  • Tsuru, Tsuyoshi

Coordination within organizations has been recognized as an issue of central importance in the organizational economics literature, where the degree of interdependence between individuals’ actions is taken as given. In reality, however, the degree of interdependence is affected by the choice of an organization’s strategy, and hence there are inter-relationships among the interdependence of individuals’ actions within organizations, their ability to coordinate their actions, and the choice of the organization’s strategy. We explore these inter-relationships by focusing on coordination between engineers. In our theoretical model, we consider a firm that designs and sells a product which consists of two components, 1 and 2. Engineer i (= 1, 2), who is in charge of the design of component i, attempts to maximize component i’s quality (local quality). The degree to which designs of different components interact with each other is a key determinant of success in product development. In this context, previous research on product design has found that product architecture is a useful concept. In our model, a firm can increase the product’s global quality by increasing the integrality of the product’s architecture. Higher integrality, however, also increases the degree of interaction between the two components’ designs, making coordination between engineers more important. We hypothesize that the longer the engineers work together the better they can coordinate their actions. Our model yields the following testable prediction: “As consumers’ valuation of product quality increases, the firm invests more to reduce engineers’ turnover rate. A lower turnover rate, in turn, increases the integrality of the product architecture.” We investigate this prediction empirically by analysing data we collected through administration of questionnaire surveys to manufacturing and software companies in Japan, Korea, and China. A novelty of our questionnaire survey is that it measures the integrality of product architecture with a continuous variable ranging from 0 to 100, whereas previous studies on product architecture are based on a dichotomy of modular or integral architecture. We test our theoretical prediction by the two-stage least squares procedure, and find empirical support for our theoretical prediction in Japan and China but not in Korea. We discuss possible reasons for the lack of empirical support in Korea.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University in its series Discussion Paper Series with number 581.

in new window

Length: 25 p.
Date of creation: Nov 2012
Handle: RePEc:hit:hituec:581
Note: November, 2012
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2-1 Naka, Kunitachi City, Tokyo 186

Phone: +81-42-580-8327
Fax: +81-42-580-8333
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Ulrich, Karl, 1995. "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 419-440, May.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:hituec:581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hiromichi Miyake)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.