IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/53sti2015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Analysis of Multinational S&T Collaboration Priorities –The Case of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim N. Kotsemir

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Tatiana E. Kuznetsova

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Elena G. Nasybulina

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Anna G. Pikalova

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The problem of rationalizing S&T cooperation, including identifying the most promising areas and forms for S&T cooperation (geographical and thematic) and state support instruments, is critically important to many countries. In view of the growing complexity of global trends and domestic restrictions on development and the emergence of new factors affecting contacts with foreign countries, there are increasing demands in the international arena to collect and analyse relevant information required to make substantiated administrative decisions on various levels, including with regard to international S&T collaboration. In these conditions, researchers and experts tend to resort to a broad range of empirical methods, while politicians make more active use of their results in administrative practice and international contacts. This working paper describes and systematizes analysis results in the field of international S&T collaboration based on a bibliometric study. The authors combine quantitative methods of bibliometrics and sociology to identify prospective partners and promising areas for collaboration. In addition, the possibility of using the proposed approach to provide information support for current state policy-making is assessed, and key results of the study are examined

Suggested Citation

  • Maxim N. Kotsemir & Tatiana E. Kuznetsova & Elena G. Nasybulina & Anna G. Pikalova, 2015. "Empirical Analysis of Multinational S&T Collaboration Priorities –The Case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 53/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:53sti2015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/12/04/1080732664/53STI2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergey Shashnov & Anna Poznyak, 2011. "S&T Priorities for Modernization of Russian Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 48-56.
    2. Leonid Gokhberg & Galina Sagieva, 2007. "Russian Science: Bibliometric Indicators," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 44-53.
    3. repec:spr:scient:v:83:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0150-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Maxim Kotsemir, 2012. "Dynamics of Russian and World Science through the Prism of International Publications," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 38-58.
    5. Keld Laursen & Ammon Salter, 2005. "The fruits of intellectual production: economic and scientific specialisation among OECD countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 289-308, March.
    6. Stefano Brusoni & Paola Criscuolo & Aldo Geuna, 2005. "The knowledge bases of the world's largest pharmaceutical groups: what do patent citations to non-patent literature reveal?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 395-415.
    7. Manuel Acosta & Daniel Coronado & Esther Ferrándiz & M. Dolores León, 2014. "Regional Scientific Production and Specialization in Europe: The Role of HERD," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 949-974, May.
    8. repec:spr:scient:v:51:y:2001:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1012703117727 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Perc, Matjaž, 2010. "Growth and structure of Slovenia’s scientific collaboration network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 475-482.
    10. repec:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0038-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:spr:scient:v:46:y:1999:i:2:d:10.1007_bf02464782 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Irene Bongioanni & Cinzia Daraio & Giancarlo Ruocco, 2013. "A Quantitative Measure to Compare the Disciplinary Profiles of Research Systems and Their Evolution Over Time," DIAG Technical Reports 2013-010, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    13. repec:spr:scient:v:48:y:2000:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1005692505687 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Alexander Sokolov, 2007. "Method of Critical Technologies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 1(4), pages 64-74.
    15. repec:spr:scient:v:62:y:2005:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0005-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Johann Peter Murmann, 2012. "The co-development of industrial sectors and academic disciplines," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 229-246, November.
    17. Stefano Brusoni & Aldo Geuna, 2006. "The Key Characteristics of Sectoral Knowledge Bases: An International Comparison," Chapters,in: New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology, chapter 13 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Di Costa, 2014. "A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 183-194.
    19. Truyken L. B. Ossenblok & Tim C. E. Engels & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2012. "The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005--9)," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 280-290, September.
    20. repec:spr:scient:v:51:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1010512628145 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. repec:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1245-3 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:spr:scient:v:45:y:1999:i:2:d:10.1007_bf02458434 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:spr:scient:v:62:y:2005:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0013-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Katz, J. Sylvan & Martin, Ben R., 1997. "What is research collaboration?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, March.
    25. Hoekman, Jarno & Frenken, Koen & Tijssen, Robert J.W., 2010. "Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 662-673, June.
    26. Aldo Geuna, 2001. "Evolution of specialisation: public research in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 67-79, April.
    27. D. Medvedev., 2015. "A New Reality: Russia and Global Challenges," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 10.
    28. repec:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1463-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Grupp, Hariolf, 1995. "Science, High Technology and the Competitiveness of EU Countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 209-223, February.
    30. López-Illescas, Carmen & de Moya-Anegón, Félix & Moed, Henk F., 2008. "Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 304-316.
    31. Ding, Ying, 2011. "Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 187-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    science and technology cooperation; international partnerships; priorities for STI cooperation; bibliometric analysis; expert interviews.;

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • A00 - General Economics and Teaching - - General - - - General
    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General
    • F01 - International Economics - - General - - - Global Outlook
    • F59 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Other
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:53sti2015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamil Abdulaev) or (Victoria Elkina) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Victoria Elkina to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.