IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hdl/wpaper/2506.html

The evolution of relative income poverty in Belgium (1985 - 2021): comparing income poverty indicators across socio-economic groups

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Mariani;
  • Bea Cantillon;

Abstract

Research on long relative income poverty trends has often been hindered by the lack of reliable data sources for the earlier years in the trend. This is particularly true for Belgium, which lacks a unique data source for the period preceding the establishment of EU-SILC. Recently, BE-PARADIS, a Belgian interuniversity project, has contributed to filling this gap by harmonizing the different surveys available for the 1980s and 1990s, and reconstituting a more consistent income trend between 1985 and 2021. By employing the dataset developed by the BE-PARADIS project, and by using original data to integrate an extra poverty estimate for Flanders for 1976, in this working paper we analyze the evolution of distinct income poverty indicators across the whole population and by several socio-economic subgroups. Specifically, we observe how relative income poverty – calculated both by using a 60% and 40% median income threshold – evolved among the workingage population, pensioners, individuals with a low educational degree, and individuals living in very low work intensity households. We also trace the evolution of the anchored poverty rate, the poverty gap, and the median equivalized household income over time and across the already mentioned subgroups. While relative income poverty declined between 2018 and 2021, we find that this increased during the decade 2008-2018. The evolution of the income poverty rate, calculated using the 40% threshold, follows a similar trend, and the poverty gap also shrunk between 2018 and 2021. Moreover, we show that the increase in median yearly incomes strengthened between 2018 and 2021. The subgroups’ analysis reveals that, while income poverty declined strongly among pensioners, particularly between 2006 and 2014, it increased among the working-age between 2008 and 2018. Low educated individuals and those living in very low work intensity households also became poorer between 2005 and 2018, but their poverty rates decreased between 2018 and 2021. While the decline after 2018 brought overall and working-age income poverty down to historically low levels, for the lower educated and those in low work intensity households, in 2021 poverty remained higher than at the onset of the trend – whether one considers the shorter EU-SILC trend from 2004 or the long trend since 1985, or even 1976. This prompts questions on what made these specific groups poorer during the years of increasing relative poverty, and how this explains the upward poverty trend before 2018.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Mariani; & Bea Cantillon;, 2025. "The evolution of relative income poverty in Belgium (1985 - 2021): comparing income poverty indicators across socio-economic groups," Working Papers 2506, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
  • Handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:29836
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marx, Ive & Nolan, Brian & Olivera, Javier, 2014. "The Welfare State and Anti-Poverty Policy in Rich Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 8154, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Koen Decancq & Tim Goedemé & Karel Van den Bosch & Josefine Vanhille, 2013. "The Evolution of Poverty in the European Union: Concepts, Measurement and Data," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/01, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    3. Bea Cantillon;, 2022. "POVERTY AND THE TRAGEDY OF THE WELFARE STATE Seven terms for a new social contract," Working Papers 2206, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    4. Besharov, Douglas J. & Couch, Kenneth A. (ed.), 2012. "Counting the Poor: New Thinking About European Poverty Measures and Lessons for the United States," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199860586.
    5. Atkinson, Tony & Cantillon, Bea & Marlier, Eric & Nolan, Brian, 2002. "Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199253494.
    6. Bea Cantillon, 2018. "Social Security and Poverty Reduction in Rich Welfare States: Cracks in the Post War Policy Paradigm, Avenues for the Future," Working Papers 1817, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    7. Terry Ward & Erhan Ozdemir, 2013. "Measuring low work intensity – an analysis of the indicator," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/09, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna B. Kis & András Gábos, 2015. "Consistent poverty across the EU," ImPRovE Working Papers 15/22, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    2. Tim Goedemé & Karel Van den Bosch & Lina Salanauskaite & Gerlinde Verbist, 2013. "Testing the Statistical Significance of Microsimulation Results: Often Easier than You Think. A Technical Note," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/10, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    3. Achille Lemmi & Donatella Grassi & Alessandra Masi & Nicoletta Pannuzi & Andrea Regoli, 2019. "Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 299-330, January.
    4. Sarah Marchal & Linus Sióland, 2019. "A safety net that holds? Tracking minimum income protection adequacy for the elderly, the working and the non-working of active age," Working Papers 1909, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    5. Tim Goedemé & Karel Van den Bosch & Lina Salanauskaite & Gerlinde Verbist, 2013. "Testing the Statistical Significance of Microsimulation Results: A Plea," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 6(3), pages 50-77.
    6. Nicky Rogge, 2017. "Measuring the impact of the economic crisis on the level of change in EU social inclusion: period 2005–2012," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 103-116, April.
    7. Wim Van Lancker & Natascha Van Mechelen, 2014. "Universalism under siege? Exploring the association between targeting, child benefits and child poverty across 26 countries," Working Papers 1401, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    8. Sarah Marchal & Wim Van Lancker, 2019. "The Measurement of Targeting Design in Complex Welfare States: A Proposal and Empirical Applications," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 693-726, June.
    9. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2016. "Behind and beyond the (head count) employment rate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(3), pages 657-681, June.
    10. Tess Penne & Ilse Cornelis & Bérénice Storms, 2020. "All we need is…," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 991-1013, February.
    11. Martina Mysíková & Tomáš Želinský & Thesia I. Garner & Jiří Večerník, 2019. "Subjective Perceptions of Poverty and Objective Economic Conditions: Czechia and Slovakia a Quarter Century After the Dissolution of Czechoslovakia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 523-550, September.
    12. Ilari Ilmakunnas & Lauri Mäkinen, 2021. "Age Differences in Material Deprivation in Finland: How do Consensus and Prevalence-Based Weighting Approaches Change the Picture?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 393-412, April.
    13. Irene Cussó-Parcerisas & Elena Carrillo Álvarez & Jordi Riera-Romaní, 2018. "What is the Minimum Budget for an Adequate Social Participation in Spain? An Estimate Through the Reference Budgets Approach," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 263-290, February.
    14. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Silber, Jacques, 2018. "Multi-dimensional poverty among adults in Central America and gender differences in the three I’s of poverty: Applying inequality sensitive poverty measures with ordinal variables," MPRA Paper 88750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    16. Olivier Bargain & Tim Callan, 2010. "Analysing the effects of tax-benefit reforms on income distribution: a decomposition approach," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Frick, Joachim R. & Grabka, Markus M. & Smeeding, Timothy M. & Tsakloglou, Panos, 2010. "Distributional Effects of Imputed Rents in Five European Countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 167-179.
    18. Christos Koutsampelas & Panos Tsakloglou, 2013. "The distribution of full income in Greece," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(4), pages 311-330, March.
    19. Bruce D. Meyer & James X. Sullivan, 2012. "Identifying the Disadvantaged: Official Poverty, Consumption Poverty, and the New Supplemental Poverty Measure," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(3), pages 111-136, Summer.
    20. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Araar, Abdelkrim & Giles, John, 2010. "Chronic and transient poverty: Measurement and estimation, with evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 266-277, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Santiago Burone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csbuabe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.