IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03887621.html

Worms or sugar? Mass deworming treatment doubles the probability to suffer from diabetes ten to fifteen years later

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Chort

    (TREE - Transitions Energétiques et Environnementales - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IUF - Institut universitaire de France - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, IZA - Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit - Institute of Labor Economics)

  • Olivier Dagnelie

    (TREE - Transitions Energétiques et Environnementales - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Mass deworming has long been promoted as a cost-effective device to improve health status and educational attainment of children. Recent contributions suggest that they would in addition increase lifetime earnings of individuals. However, recent medical research emphasizes the role played by the gut microbiome and helminths in particular – colloquially termed worms – on the prevention of metabolic syndromes and inflammatory diseases including Type-2 diabetes. We use publicly available data from the Kenya Life Panel Survey (rounds 2 and 3) that follows a representative sample of children initially part of the Primary School Deworming Project randomized experiment 10 and 15 years after the intervention and study the impact of deworming on diabetes. We find that children who were enrolled in early treated schools and received two to three additional years of deworming treatment are twice more likely to declare suffering from diabetes 10 to 15 years later (n=31 for 6,390 treated individuals) than individuals in the control group (n=7 for 3,284 individuals). Our results are consistent with a protective effect of worm infection against diabetes and suggest potential adverse long-term health impacts of mass deworming administration. Given the cost of diabetes treatment in low and middle-income countries, the cost-benefit balance of mass deworming may need to be reevaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Chort & Olivier Dagnelie, 2022. "Worms or sugar? Mass deworming treatment doubles the probability to suffer from diabetes ten to fifteen years later," Working Papers hal-03887621, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03887621
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-03887621v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-03887621v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Baird & Joan Hamory Hicks & Michael Kremer & Edward Miguel, 2016. "Worms at Work: Long-run Impacts of a Child Health Investment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1637-1680.
    2. Kevin Croke & Joan Hamory Hicks & Eric Hsu & Michael Kremer & Ricardo Maertens & Edward Miguel & Witold Więcek, 2016. "Meta-Analysis and Public Policy: Reconciling the Evidence on Deworming," NBER Working Papers 22382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Croke,Kevin & Hicks,Joan Hamory & Hsu,Eric & Kremer,Michael Robert & Miguel,Edward A., 2016. "Does mass deworming affect child nutrition ? meta-analysis, cost-effectiveness, and statistical power," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7921, The World Bank.
    4. Edward Miguel & Michael Kremer, 2004. "Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 159-217, January.
    5. Till Seuring & Olga Archangelidi & Marc Suhrcke, 2015. "The Economic Costs of Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 811-831, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Owen Ozier, 2021. "Replication Redux: The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming [Economics of Mass Deworming Programs]," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 36(1), pages 101-130.
    2. Isabelle Chort & Olivier Dagnelie, 2022. "Worms or sugar? Mass deworming treatment doubles the probability to suffer from diabetes ten to fifteen years later," Working papers of Transitions Energétiques et Environnementales (TREE) hal-03887621, HAL.
    3. repec:plo:pntd00:0007085 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Isaiah Andrews & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2021. "A Model of Scientific Communication," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2117-2142, September.
    5. Kevin Croke & Joan Hamory Hicks & Eric Hsu & Michael Kremer & Edward Miguel, 2017. "Should the WHO withdraw support for mass deworming?," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-3, June.
    6. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    7. Fox, Jonathan & Grigoriadis, Theocharis, 2018. "A rural health supplement to the hookworm intervention in the American South," Discussion Papers 2018/5, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    8. Bloom, David E. & Kuhn, Michael & Prettner, Klaus, 2018. "Health and Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 11939, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Roodman, David, 2018. "The Impacts of Hookworm Eradication in the American South. A replication study of Bleakley (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007)," International Journal for Re-Views in Empirical Economics (IREE), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2, pages 1-45.
    10. Joan Hamory & Edward Miguel & Michael W. Walker & Michael Kremer & Sarah J. Baird, 2020. "Twenty Year Economic Impacts of Deworming," NBER Working Papers 27611, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Isaiah Andrews & Maximilian Kasy, 2019. "Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2766-2794, August.
    12. Yao Yao, 2026. "Health, Gender Division of Labor, and Productivity," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 62, November.
    13. Anett John & Kate Orkin, 2022. "Can Simple Psychological Interventions Increase Preventive Health Investment?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(3), pages 1001-1047.
    14. Bauer, Michal & Chytilová, Julie & Miguel, Edward, 2020. "Using survey questions to measure preferences: Lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Anjali Adukia, 2017. "Sanitation and Education," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 23-59, April.
    16. M. Perez-Alvarez & M. Favara, 2023. "Children having children: early motherhood and offspring human capital in India," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 1573-1606, July.
    17. Jan-Walter De Neve & Rija L Andriantavison & Kevin Croke & Johannes Krisam & Voahirana H Rajoela & Rary A Rakotoarivony & Valérie Rambeloson & Linda Schultz & Jumana Qamruddin & Stéphane Verguet, 2018. "Health, financial, and education gains of investing in preventive chemotherapy for schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and lymphatic filariasis in Madagascar: A modeling study," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Alfonsi, Livia & Bauer, Michal & Chytilová, Julie & Miguel, Edward, 2024. "Human capital affects religious identity: Causal evidence from Kenya," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Chen, Yulong, 2024. "Early exposure to air pollution and cognitive development later in life: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. repec:osf:metaar:49yst_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Nathan Nunn, 2019. "Rethinking economic development," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 52(4), pages 1349-1373, November.
    22. Emmanuel Nshakira-Rukundo & Essa Chanie Mussa & Nathan Nshakira & Nicolas Gerber & Joachim von Braun, 2021. "Impact of community-based health insurance on utilisation of preventive health services in rural Uganda: a propensity score matching approach," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 203-227, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03887621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.