IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03244324.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Bivariate Mortality Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Jiao

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Yahia Salhi

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

  • Shihua Wang

Abstract

The dependence structure of the life statuses plays an important role in the valuation of life insurance products involving multiple lives. Although the mortality of individuals is well studied in the literature, their dependence remains a challenging field. In this paper, the main objective is to introduce a new approach for analyzing the mortality dependence between two individuals in a couple. It is intended to describe in a dynamic framework the joint mortality of married couples in terms of marginal mortality rates. The proposed framework is general and aims to capture, by adjusting some parametric form, the desired effect such as the "broken-heart syndrome". To this end, we use a well-suited multiplicative decomposition, which will serve as a building block for the framework and thus will be used to separate the dependence structure from the marginals. We make the link with the existing practice of affine mortality models. Finally, given that the framework is general, we propose some illustrative examples and show how the underlying model captures the main stylized facts of bivariate mortality dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Jiao & Yahia Salhi & Shihua Wang, 2021. "Dynamic Bivariate Mortality Modelling," Working Papers hal-03244324, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03244324
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03244324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03244324/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dufresne, François & Hashorva, Enkelejd & Ratovomirija, Gildas & Toukourou, Youssouf, 2018. "On age difference in joint lifetime modelling with life insurance annuity applications," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 350-371, September.
    2. Stéphane Loisel, 2010. "Understanding, Modeling and Managing Longevity Risk: Key Issues and Main Challenges," Post-Print hal-00517902, HAL.
    3. Nicole El Karoui & Monique Jeanblanc & Ying Jiao, 2015. "Density approach in modelling successive defaults," Post-Print hal-00870492, HAL.
    4. Luciano, Elisa & Spreeuw, Jaap & Vigna, Elena, 2008. "Modelling stochastic mortality for dependent lives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 234-244, October.
    5. Russo, Vincenzo & Giacometti, Rosella & Ortobelli, Sergio & Rachev, Svetlozar & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2011. "Calibrating affine stochastic mortality models using term assurance premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 53-60, July.
    6. LUCIANO, Elisa & VIGNA, Elena, 2008. "Mortality risk via affine stochastic intensities: calibration and empirical relevance," MPRA Paper 59627, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Yang Lu, 2017. "Broken-Heart, Common Life, Heterogeneity: Analyzing the Spousal Mortality Dependence," Post-Print hal-03583117, HAL.
    8. Schrager, David F., 2006. "Affine stochastic mortality," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 81-97, February.
    9. Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet & Diana Dorobantu & Yahia Salhi, 2019. "A Model-Point Approach to Indifference Pricing of Life Insurance Portfolios with Dependent Lives," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 423-448, June.
    10. Salhi, Yahia & Thérond, Pierre-E., 2018. "Age-Specific Adjustment Of Graduated Mortality," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 543-569, May.
    11. Hoang Pham, 2008. "Mortality Modeling Perspectives," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Hoang Pham (ed.), Recent Advances in Reliability and Quality in Design, chapter 25, pages 509-516, Springer.
    12. Arkady E. Shemyakin & Heekyung Youn, 2006. "Copula models of joint last survivor analysis," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 211-224, March.
    13. Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond & Julien Tomas, 2016. "A Credibility Approach of the Makeham Mortality Law," Post-Print hal-01232683, HAL.
    14. Gourieroux, Christian & Lu, Yang, 2015. "Love and death: A Freund model with frailty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 191-203.
    15. Lu, Yang, 2017. "Broken-Heart, Common Life, Heterogeneity: Analyzing The Spousal Mortality Dependence," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 837-874, September.
    16. Christophette Blanchet-Scalliet & Diana Dorobantu & Yahia Salhi, 2019. "A Model-Point Approach to Indifference Pricing of Life Insurance Portfolios with Dependent Lives," Post-Print hal-01258645, HAL.
    17. Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Haberman, Steven, 2007. "Modelling the joint distribution of competing risks survival times using copula functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 339-361, November.
    18. Min Ji & Mary Hardy & Johnny Siu-Hang Li, 2011. "Markovian Approaches to Joint-Life Mortality," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 357-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Jiao & Yahia Salhi & Shihua Wang, 2022. "Dynamic Bivariate Mortality Modelling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 917-938, June.
    2. Kira Henshaw & Corina Constantinescu & Olivier Menoukeu Pamen, 2020. "Stochastic Mortality Modelling for Dependent Coupled Lives," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Jevtić, P. & Hurd, T.R., 2017. "The joint mortality of couples in continuous time," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 90-97.
    4. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2021. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2019-20 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 395-439.
    5. Elisa Luciano & Jaap Spreeuw & Elena Vigna, 2012. "Evolution of coupled lives' dependency across generations and pricing impact," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 258, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    6. Chen, Li & Lin, Luyao & Lu, Yi & Parker, Gary, 2017. "Analysis of survivorship life insurance portfolios with stochastic rates of return," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 16-31.
    7. Tat Wing Wong & Mei Choi Chiu & Hoi Ying Wong, 2017. "Managing Mortality Risk With Longevity Bonds When Mortality Rates Are Cointegrated," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(3), pages 987-1023, September.
    8. Joanna Dębicka & Stanisław Heilpern & Agnieszka Marciniuk, 2023. "Pricing Marriage Insurance with Mortality Dependence," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 15(1), pages 31-64, March.
    9. Gobbi, Fabio & Kolev, Nikolai & Mulinacci, Sabrina, 2021. "Ryu-type extended Marshall-Olkin model with implicit shocks and joint life insurance applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 342-358.
    10. Blake, David & El Karoui, Nicole & Loisel, Stéphane & MacMinn, Richard, 2018. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2015–16 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 157-173.
    11. Elisa Luciano & Jaap Spreeuw & Elena Vigna, 2016. "Spouses’ Dependence across Generations and Pricing Impact on Reversionary Annuities," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Apicella, Giovanna & Dacorogna, Michel M, 2016. "A General framework for modelling mortality to better estimate its relationship with interest rate risks," MPRA Paper 75788, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Gourieroux, Christian & Lu, Yang, 2015. "Love and death: A Freund model with frailty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 191-203.
    14. Gerard J. van den Berg & Bettina Drepper, 2022. "A unique bond: Twin bereavement and lifespan associations of identical and fraternal twins," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 677-698, April.
    15. Fung, Man Chung & Ignatieva, Katja & Sherris, Michael, 2014. "Systematic mortality risk: An analysis of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits in variable annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 103-115.
    16. van den Berg, Gerard J. & Drepper, Bettina, 2018. "A Unique Bond: Twin Bereavement and Lifespan Associations of Identical and Fraternal Twins," IZA Discussion Papers 11448, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Albrecher Hansjörg & Bladt Martin & Müller Alaric J. A., 2023. "Joint lifetime modeling with matrix distributions," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Georgina Onuma Kalu & Chinemerem Dennis Ikpe & Benjamin Ifeanyichukwu Oruh & Samuel Asante Gyamerah, 2020. "State Space Vasicek Model of a Longevity Bond," Papers 2011.12753, arXiv.org.
    19. Jevtić, Petar & Luciano, Elisa & Vigna, Elena, 2013. "Mortality surface by means of continuous time cohort models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 122-133.
    20. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2021. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Working Papers hal-02896141, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bivariate Mortality; Dependence; Conditional Survival Probability; Copula; Broken-Heart Syndrome;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03244324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.