Recurrent Attempts to Renovate Management ControlRevisited through a Simons' Perspective
Three dimensions characterize a management control system: the nature of the involvement of operational managers, the degree of customization of the underlying tools and the relationship with the compensation policy. This characterization further formalizes the distinction between diagnostic and interactive control systems introduced by Simons (1995). It provides an interesting framework to discuss the recurrent attempts to renovate management control that followed the severe criticism of Johnson and Kaplan (1987). In this framework, information systems based on a strategic vision of the activity are representative of interactive control while value based management systems such as EVA are representative of diagnostic control. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed using the proposed taxonomy as a theoretical grid.
|Date of creation:||2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00243033|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jensen, M.C. & Murphy, K.J., 1988.
"Performance Pay And Top Management Incentives,"
88-04, Rochester, Business - Managerial Economics Research Center.
- Nicolas Mottis, 1999. "Des modèles types contextualisés pour une approche intégrée de la firme. Le cas de l'informatique bancaire," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 50(1), pages 127-150.
- François Larmande & Jean-Pierre Ponssard, 2004. "EVA and the Controllability-congruence Trade-off: An Empirical Investigation," CESifo Working Paper Series 1257, CESifo Group Munich.
- Jean Ponssard & Olivier Saulpic, 2005. "Economic Modeling Triggers More Efficient Planning: An Experimental Justification," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 239-282, 05.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00243033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.