IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00186198.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le recrutement des jeunes docteurs dans le secteur privé

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Giret

    (CEREQ - Centre d'études et de recherches sur les qualifications - ministère de l'Emploi, cohésion sociale et logement - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)

  • Cathy Perret

    (IREDU - Institut de recherche sur l'éducation : Sociologie et Economie de l'Education - UB - Université de Bourgogne)

  • Isabelle Recotillet

    (CEREQ - Centre d'études et de recherches sur les qualifications - ministère de l'Emploi, cohésion sociale et logement - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between the characteristics of the doctoral training and the recruitment of young PhDs in the private sector in France. We used information from a national representative survey of 1246 PhDs graduated in 2001 and interviewed in 2004. We focus on the recruitment and PhD returns among research-based jobs and non-research jobs in the private sector. Our econometrics results show that access and wages in the R&D jobs strongly depends on previous labour experience during the PhD (participation in a research contract, private funding for the PhD). In addition, we find that PhD students who expressed a preference for academia pay a wage penalty when they access to research-based jobs in the private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Giret & Cathy Perret & Isabelle Recotillet, 2007. "Le recrutement des jeunes docteurs dans le secteur privé," Post-Print halshs-00186198, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00186198
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00186198v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00186198v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbons, Michael & Johnston, Ron, 1974. "The roles of science in technological innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 220-242, November.
    2. Rachel Levy, 2005. "Les doctorants CIFRE : Médiateurs entre laboratoires de recherche universitaires et entreprises," Post-Print hal-00279357, HAL.
    3. Rachel Levy, 2005. "Les doctorants CIFRE : médiateurs entre laboratoires de recherche universitaires et entreprises," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 111(1), pages 79-96.
    4. Caroline Lanciano-Morandat & Hiroatsu Nohara, 2002. "Analyse sociétale des marchés du travail des scientifiques," Post-Print halshs-00506015, HAL.
    5. Paula E. Stephan & Albert J. Sumell & Grant C. Black & James D. Adams, 2004. "Doctoral Education and Economic Development: The Flow of New Ph.D.s to Industry," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(2), pages 151-167, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bastien Bernela, 2015. "Professional and geographical paths: the study of three generations of PhDs [Trajectoires professionnelles et géographiques : l'étude de trois générations de docteurs]," Working Papers halshs-01085008, HAL.
    2. Claire Bonnard & Julien Calmand & Jean-François Giret, 2016. "Devenir chercheur ou enseignant chercheur : le goût pour la recherche des doctorants à l'épreuve du marché du travail," Post-Print halshs-01282661, HAL.
    3. Claire Bonnard, 2012. "The Access of the Young Graduates in Sciences into R&D Profession: A Switching Model Treatment for the French Case," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 26(1), pages 46-65, March.
    4. Clotilde Coron & Anis Amokrane & Matthieu Lafon, 2024. "Sentiment de satisfaction des docteurs en début de carrière et conditions d’emploi : une analyse au prisme du genre," Post-Print halshs-04628826, HAL.
    5. Zeting LIU, 2011. "Les politiques d’innovation françaises et la place des PME : une revue historique FRENCH INNOVATION POLICIES AND THE ROLE OF SMES: A HISTORICAL REVIEW," Working Papers 23, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    6. Claire Bonnard, 2012. "The Access of the Young Graduates in Sciences into RD Profession: A Switching Model Treatment for the French Case," Post-Print halshs-00671315, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastien Bernela & Rachel Levy, 2017. "Collaboration networks within a French cluster: Do partners really interact with each other?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(1), pages 115-138, March.
    2. Francisco Más-Verdú & Jose Polo Otero & José García Quevedo, 2010. "Which firms want PhDs? The effect of the university-industry relationship on the PhD labour market," Working Papers 2010R02, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    3. Sergio Afcha & Jose García-Quevedo, 2016. "The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(6), pages 955-975.
    4. Basse Mama, Houdou, 2018. "Nonlinear capital market payoffs to science-led innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1084-1095.
    5. Lee, Hsing-fen & Miozzo, Marcela & Laredo, Philippe, 2010. "Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 869-881, September.
    6. Claire Bonnard & Julien Calmand & Jean-François Giret, 2016. "Devenir chercheur ou enseignant chercheur : le goût pour la recherche des doctorants à l'épreuve du marché du travail," Post-Print halshs-01282661, HAL.
    7. Negin Salimi & Jafar Rezaei, 2016. "Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1911-1938, December.
    8. Leone, Maria Isabella & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo, 2022. "Boundary spanning through external technology acquisition: The moderating role of star scientists and upstream alliances," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Matthew Nagle, 2007. "Canonical Analysis of University Presence and Industrial Comparative Advantage," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(4), pages 325-338, November.
    10. Afcha, S. & García-Quevedo, J. & Mas-Verdú, F., 2023. "Gaining or losing PhDs: What are the effects on firms' linkages with universities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    11. James Adams & J. Roger Clemmons, 2008. "Science And Industry: Tracing The Flow Of Basic Research Through Manufacturing And Trade," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 473-495.
    12. McLeish, Caitriona & Nightingale, Paul, 2007. "Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1635-1654, December.
    13. Jürgen Janger, 2015. "Business Science Links For a New Growth Path. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 107," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58413.
    14. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Lia Sheer, 2017. "Back to Basics: Why do Firms Invest in Research?," NBER Working Papers 23187, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Carlos Bianchi, 2019. "Diversity, novelty and satisfactoriness in health innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1059-1081, July.
    16. Yian Yin & Yuxiao Dong & Kuansan Wang & Dashun Wang & Benjamin F. Jones, 2022. "Public use and public funding of science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1344-1350, October.
    17. Simeth, Markus & Lhuillery, Stephane, 2015. "How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1283-1295.
    18. Zhao, Shengchao & Zeng, Deming & Li, Jian & Feng, Ke & Wang, Yao, 2023. "Quantity or quality: The roles of technology and science convergence on firm innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Pavitt, Keith, 1998. "The social shaping of the national science base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 793-805, December.
    20. Mario COCCIA, 2018. "Evolution of the economics of science in the Twenty Century," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 65-84, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00186198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.